Rajah Megan Rian, Doubell Anton, Herbst Philip
Cardiology, Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Cardiology, Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Open Heart. 2025 May 7;12(1):e003345. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003345.
Afterload mismatch (AM) refers to high-gradient (mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg) severe aortic stenosis (AS) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) that is hypothesised to arise from mechanisms other than true contractile impairment. The extent, pattern and functional impact of myocardial fibrosis (MF), which is associated with systolic impairment, is poorly understood in the context of AM.
High-gradient severe AS patients with (n=25; low ejection fraction high-gradient, LEF-HG) and without (n=33; normal ejection fraction high-gradient (NEF-HG)) reduced LVEF underwent cardiovascular MRI. Using T1 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV) fraction and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), the extent and pattern of MF was compared between the two groups. End-systolic wall stress (ESWS) as a measure of afterload was estimated, and its relationship with LVEF was compared with that of MF and LVEF.
Stenosis severity was worse in the LEF-HG group (aortic valve area 0.5±0.2 vs 0.7±0.2 cm, mean gradient 55 (46-66) vs 48 (41-69) mm Hg). In the LEF-HG group, high ESWS with cavity dilation and significant hypertrophy were observed compared with the NEF-HG group. MF was present in both groups with a significantly higher burden in the LEF-HG group (T1 time 1061±22 vs 1041±33 ms, ECV 26%±3% vs 24%±3%, LGE mass 4.3 (1.7-9.3) vs 0.1 (0.06-3.39) g). The association between MF and LVEF was weak, while ESWS was strongly associated with LVEF (r -0.8, p<0.0001) and was the best predictor of LVEF in multivariate prediction analysis.
MF was present in both groups with a higher burden in those with LEF-HG AS. High ESWS, that is, afterload, rather than MF, was the strongest predictor of LVEF. While MF may not directly impact systolic function in AM, it is still an important factor to account for in AS given its association with increased mortality.
后负荷不匹配(AM)指的是高梯度(平均梯度≥40mmHg)的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS),伴有左心室射血分数降低(LVEF<50%),据推测其产生机制并非真正的收缩功能受损。在AM背景下,与收缩功能障碍相关的心肌纤维化(MF)的程度、模式及功能影响尚不清楚。
对高梯度重度AS患者进行心血管磁共振成像检查,其中左心室射血分数降低的患者25例(低射血分数高梯度组,LEF-HG),左心室射血分数正常的患者33例(正常射血分数高梯度组,NEF-HG)。利用T1 mapping、细胞外容积(ECV)分数和延迟钆增强(LGE),比较两组间MF的程度和模式。估算作为后负荷指标的收缩末期壁应力(ESWS),并将其与LVEF以及MF与LVEF的关系进行比较。
LEF-HG组的狭窄程度更严重(主动脉瓣面积0.5±0.2 vs 0.7±0.2cm,平均梯度55(46 - 66)vs 48(41 - 69)mmHg)。与NEF-HG组相比,LEF-HG组观察到高ESWS伴心腔扩大和显著肥厚。两组均存在MF,且LEF-HG组的负担显著更高(T1时间1061±22 vs 1041±33ms,ECV 26%±3% vs 24%±3%,LGE质量4.3(1.7 - 9.3)vs 0.1(0.06 - 3.39)g)。MF与LVEF之间的关联较弱,而ESWS与LVEF密切相关(r -0.8,p<0.0001),并且在多变量预测分析中是LVEF的最佳预测指标。
两组均存在MF,LEF-HG AS患者的负担更高。高ESWS,即后负荷,而非MF,是LVEF的最强预测指标。虽然MF在AM中可能不会直接影响收缩功能,但鉴于其与死亡率增加相关,在AS中仍是一个需要考虑的重要因素。