Mahlknecht Josef Franz, Burtscher Eugen, Ramšak Ivan, Zürcher Christine, Bernard Johannes
FMD Research Centre, 39030 Kiens, Italy.
IMAK/FMD, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 6;14(15):5555. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155555.
This study aimed to investigate whether the subjective assessments of strong and weak muscles in the Functional Myodiagnosis muscle test (FMD-MT) can be objectively and reproducibly verified using physically measurable parameters. Additionally, we sought to evaluate the reliability of the manual muscle test in order to reinforce the scientific evidence supporting this accepted, yet not widely adopted, complementary medicine method. In a crossover observational study, three experienced medical practitioners conducted the FMD-MT of the rectus femoris muscle on 24 healthy participants using a specially designed therapy bench, with all measurements recorded via an oscillogram. The study investigated the force-time integral, joint angle change, additional force load, mean force turning point 1, as well as the interrater reliability and validity of both examiner assessments and instrumental analyses for the two muscle reaction variants: strong and weak. A significant difference between the response pattern of strong and weak muscles was identified for the force-time integral ( = 0.005), the change in joint angle ( < 0.001), and the additional force load ( = 0.001). No difference between strong and weak muscles could be detected regarding the force turning point 1 ( = 0.972). The examiners demonstrated 100% accuracy in identifying weak muscle reactions as weak, and 99.2% accuracy in identifying strong muscle reactions as strong ( = 0.316). The overall intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.984. The oscillogram correctly visualized weak muscle reactions in weak muscles with an accuracy of 81.7%, and strong muscle reactions in strong muscles with an accuracy of 86.7% ( = 0.289). The Functional Myodiagnosis muscle test (FMD-MT) enables a clear and objective differentiation between strong and weak muscles, with statistically significant differences observed in the force-time integral, additional force load, and joint angle changes. Under rigorously standardized testing conditions, the FMD-MT of the rectus femoris muscle demonstrates a validity rate of 99.6% and an excellent reliability (ICC 0.984). Consequently, the FMD muscle test proves to be a reliable, reproducible, and objective diagnostic method. Trial registration: German Register of Clinical Studies U1111-1212-6622.
本研究旨在探讨能否使用物理可测量参数对功能性肌诊断肌肉测试(FMD-MT)中肌肉强弱的主观评估进行客观且可重复的验证。此外,我们试图评估徒手肌力测试的可靠性,以强化支持这种已被认可但未被广泛采用的补充医学方法的科学证据。在一项交叉观察性研究中,三名经验丰富的医学从业者使用专门设计的治疗台,对24名健康参与者的股直肌进行FMD-MT,所有测量通过示波器记录。该研究调查了力-时间积分、关节角度变化、附加力负荷、平均力转折点1,以及两种肌肉反应变体(强和弱)的检查者评估和仪器分析的评分者间信度和效度。在力-时间积分(P = 0.005)、关节角度变化(P < 0.001)和附加力负荷(P = 0.001)方面,强肌和弱肌的反应模式存在显著差异。在力转折点1方面,未检测到强肌和弱肌之间存在差异(P = 0.972)。检查者将弱肌反应识别为弱的准确率为100%,将强肌反应识别为强的准确率为99.2%(P = 0.316)。总体组内相关系数为0.984。示波器正确可视化弱肌中弱肌反应的准确率为81.7%,可视化强肌中强肌反应的准确率为86.7%(P = 0.289)。功能性肌诊断肌肉测试(FMD-MT)能够清晰、客观地区分强肌和弱肌,在力-时间积分、附加力负荷和关节角度变化方面观察到具有统计学意义的差异。在严格标准化的测试条件下,股直肌的FMD-MT显示出99.6%的有效率和出色的可靠性(ICC 0.984)。因此,FMD肌肉测试被证明是一种可靠、可重复且客观的诊断方法。试验注册:德国临床研究注册中心U1111-1212-6622。