Chen Qiang, Zhang Mengru, Zhang Li, Aierken Alimire, Dong Ran, Xu Xianghuai, Yu Li, Lai Kefang, Qiu Zhongmin
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, China.
Centre for Clinical Science, Respiratory Medicine, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Castle Road, Cottingham, UK.
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 4;86:103367. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103367. eCollection 2025 Aug.
BACKGROUND: The antitussive potential of flupentixol-melitracen, an anti-anxiety and anti-depression compound, has been observed previously. We aimed to further evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC) who were unresponsive to any other available treatments. METHODS: This randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at a single specialist cough clinic in Tongji Hspital, Shanghai, China. Adults aged 18-69 years with RCC and persistent cough despite at least two weeks of neuromodulator therapy were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral flupentixol-melitracen (flupentixol 0.5 mg + melitracen 10 mg), one tablet twice daily, or matching placebo, for two weeks, followed by a one week of off-treatment safety monitoring. Randomisation was computer-generated, with masking of participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. The co-primary endpoints were cough resolution rate (≥50% reduction in cough symptom score [CSS]) at visit four and placebo-adjusted change in CSS over time. The full analysis set (FAS) was used following the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) principle for demographic baseline analysis and efficacy analysis. The safety set (SS) was used for safety analysis and included all patients who took at least one dose of treatment and had post-dose safety records. The FAS and SS were equivalent in this study. The trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000035304. FINDINGS: Between March 9th, 2021 and December 1st, 2023, 102 patients were enrolled and randomised. A total of 99 patients received at least one dose of treatment and were included in the primary and safety analyses (49 taking flupentixol-melitracen and 50 taking placebo). At visit four, flupentixol-melitracen arm reached significantly higher cough resolution rate (65.3% [32/49] vs 32.0% [16/50]; p = 0.0009). The adjusted mean reduction in CSS was 0.144 points greater in the flupentixol-melitracen group than in the placebo group over time (p = 0.0034). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 51.0% (15/49) of patients in the flupentixol-melitracen group and 34.0% (17/50) in the placebo group. No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths were reported. All adverse events were mild and resolved after discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that short-term use of flupentixol-melitracen may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for RCC. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to key limitations, including the absence of objective cough frequency measurement and limited generalisability beyond a single-centre population. These factors may influence the precision and applicability of the observed treatment effect. Further trials using objective endpoints and longer follow-up in broader populations are needed to confirm efficacy and safety. FUNDING: The Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality.
背景:此前已观察到抗焦虑和抗抑郁化合物氟哌噻吨美利曲辛的镇咳潜力。我们旨在进一步评估其在对任何其他可用治疗均无反应的难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)患者中的疗效和安全性。 方法:这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验在中国上海同济大学附属同济医院的一家专科咳嗽诊所进行。纳入年龄在18 - 69岁之间、患有RCC且尽管接受了至少两周的神经调节剂治疗仍持续咳嗽的成年人。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受口服氟哌噻吨美利曲辛(氟哌噻吨0.5毫克 + 美利曲辛10毫克),每日两次,每次一片,或匹配的安慰剂,为期两周,随后进行一周的停药安全性监测。随机分组由计算机生成,对参与者、研究者和结果评估者进行了盲法处理。共同主要终点是在第四次就诊时的咳嗽缓解率(咳嗽症状评分[CSS]降低≥50%)以及随时间变化的CSS的安慰剂调整变化。按照改良意向性分析(mITT)原则,使用全分析集(FAS)进行人口统计学基线分析和疗效分析。安全集(SS)用于安全性分析,包括所有服用至少一剂治疗药物并具有给药后安全记录的患者。在本研究中,FAS和SS是等效的。该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ChiCTR2000035304。 研究结果:在2021年3月9日至2023年12月1日期间,共纳入102例患者并进行随机分组。共有99例患者接受了至少一剂治疗药物,并被纳入主要分析和安全性分析(49例服用氟哌噻吨美利曲辛,50例服用安慰剂)。在第四次就诊时,氟哌噻吨美利曲辛组的咳嗽缓解率显著更高(65.3%[32/49] vs 32.0%[16/50];p = 0.0009)。随着时间的推移,氟哌噻吨美利曲辛组CSS的调整后平均降低值比安慰剂组大0.144分(p = 0.0034)。氟哌噻吨美利曲辛组51.0%(15/49)的患者发生了治疗中出现的不良事件,安慰剂组为34.0%(17/50)。未报告严重不良事件或与治疗相关的死亡。所有不良事件均为轻度,停药后缓解。 解读:我们的研究结果表明,短期使用氟哌噻吨美利曲辛可能是一种有效且耐受性良好的RCC治疗方法。然而,由于存在关键局限性,包括缺乏客观咳嗽频率测量以及在单中心人群之外的可推广性有限,这些结果应谨慎解读。这些因素可能会影响所观察到的治疗效果的准确性和适用性。需要在更广泛的人群中使用客观终点并进行更长时间随访的进一步试验来确认疗效和安全性。 资助:上海市科学技术委员会项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Health Technol Assess. 2025-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-23
ERJ Open Res. 2024-10-28
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2023-11
J Physiol. 2024-11
J Thorac Dis. 2022-12
Lancet Respir Med. 2022-12
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022-6-30