Elliott Emily M, Morey Candice C, AuBuchon Angela M, Cowan Nelson, Jarrold Chris, Adams Eryn, Attwood Meg, Bayram Büşra, Beeler-Duden Stefen, Blakstvedt Taran Y, Büttner Gerhard, Castelain Thomas, Cave Shari, Crepaldi Davide, Fredriksen Eivor, Glass Bret, Graves Andrew, Guitard Dominic, Hoehl Stefanie, Hosch Alexis, Jeanneret Stéphanie, Joseph Tanya N, Koch Chris, Lelonkiewicz Jaroslaw R, Lupyan Gary, McDonald Amalia, Meissner Grace, Mendenhall Whitney, Moreau David, Ostermann Thomas, Özdoğru Asil Ali, Padovani Francesca, Poloczek Sebastian, Röer Jan Phillip, Schonberg Christina, Tamnes Christian K, Tomasik Martin J, Valentini Beatrice, Vergauwe Evie, Vlach Haley, Voracek Martin
Louisiana State University.
Cardiff University.
Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2021 Apr-Jun;4(2). doi: 10.1177/25152459211018187. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
Work by Flavell, Beach, and Chinsky (1966) indicated a change in the spontaneous production of overt verbalization behaviors when comparing young children (age 5) to older children (age 10). Despite the critical role that this evidence of a change in verbalization behaviors plays in modern theories of cognitive development and working memory, there has only been one other published near-replication of this work (Keeney, Cannizzo, & Flavell, 1967). This Registered Replication Report relied upon 17 labs who contributed their results to a larger and more comprehensive sample of children. We assessed memory performance and the presence or absence of verbalization behaviors of young children at different ages, and determined that the original pattern of findings was largely upheld: older children were more likely to verbalize, and their memory spans improved. We confirmed that 5- and 6-year-old children who verbalized recalled more than children who did not verbalize. However, unlike Flavell et al., substantial proportions of our 5- and 6-year-old samples overtly verbalized at least sometimes during the picture memory task. Also, continuous increase in overt verbalization from 7- to 10-years-old was not consistently evident in our samples. These robust findings should be weighed when considering theories of cognitive development, particularly theories concerning when verbal rehearsal emerges and relations between speech and memory.
弗拉维尔、比奇和钦斯基(1966年)的研究表明,在比较幼儿(5岁)和大龄儿童(10岁)时,明显的言语化行为的自发产生存在变化。尽管言语化行为变化的这一证据在现代认知发展理论和工作记忆理论中起着关键作用,但该研究仅有另一项已发表的近似重复研究(基尼、坎尼佐和弗拉维尔,1967年)。本注册重复报告依靠17个实验室,它们将研究结果贡献给了一个更大、更全面的儿童样本。我们评估了不同年龄段幼儿的记忆表现以及言语化行为的有无,并确定最初的研究结果模式在很大程度上得到了支持:大龄儿童更有可能言语化,且他们的记忆广度有所提高。我们证实,在图片记忆任务中,言语化的5岁和6岁儿童比未言语化的儿童回忆得更多。然而,与弗拉维尔等人的研究不同,我们样本中相当大比例的5岁和6岁儿童在图片记忆任务中至少有时会明显地言语化。此外,在我们的样本中,7岁至10岁儿童明显言语化行为的持续增加并不始终明显。在考虑认知发展理论,尤其是关于言语复述何时出现以及言语与记忆之间关系的理论时,应权衡这些有力的研究结果。