• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冰岛三十年基于人群的乳腺癌筛查:40 - 49岁与50 - 69岁女性质量指标和肿瘤特征比较

Thirty years of population-based breast cancer screening in Iceland: a comparison of quality indicators and tumour characteristics between women aged 40-49 and 50-69 years.

作者信息

Haraldsdottir Alfheidur, Birgisson Helgi, Agustsson Agust I, Tryggvadottir Laufey

机构信息

Icelandic Cancer Registry, Icelandic Cancer Society, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Cancer Screening Coordination Centre, Primary Health Care of the Capital Area, Reykjavik, Iceland.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2025 Aug 14;64:1061-1070. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44090.

DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44090
PMID:40814243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12372527/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Organised mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality by 30-40% in women aged 50-69. Despite limited evidence for women aged 40-49, screening guidelines are trending toward younger ages. Iceland has offered biennial screening to women aged 40-69 since 1987. This study compares screening quality indicators and tumour characteristics between women aged 40-49 and 50-69 from 1990 to 2020. Patient/material and methods: Screening-related data were obtained from the Icelandic Breast Cancer Screening Program, and breast cancer diagnoses and tumour characteristics were sourced from the Icelandic Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

In total, 84,677 women aged 40-69 years attended 455,532 organised screening sessions in Iceland over a 30-year period. Women aged 40-49 years demonstrated higher recall rates (4.9% vs. 3.5%) and lower participation rates (60.7% vs. 61.5%), lower breast cancer detection rates (2.1 vs. 6.0/1,000), and lower episode sensitivity (54.8% vs. 70.5%), compared to those aged 50-69 years. Among screen-detected cases, women aged 40-49 years exhibited a higher proportion of tumours larger than 20 mm (29.7% vs. 21.7%), more lymph node positivity (41.2% vs. 28.2%) and higher human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity (18.6% vs. 11.8%), compared to those aged 50-69 years.

INTERPRETATION

The disparity in breast cancer screening performances between the age groups may reflect unmodifiable factors in younger women. The presence of advanced tumour characteristics among women aged 40-49 years who attended screening indicates the importance of early detection for improving prognosis.

摘要

背景与目的

有组织的乳腺钼靶筛查可使50 - 69岁女性的乳腺癌死亡率降低30% - 40%。尽管40 - 49岁女性的相关证据有限,但筛查指南正趋向于更低年龄。自1987年以来,冰岛为40 - 69岁女性提供两年一次的筛查。本研究比较了1990年至2020年40 - 49岁和50 - 69岁女性的筛查质量指标及肿瘤特征。患者/材料与方法:筛查相关数据来自冰岛乳腺癌筛查项目,乳腺癌诊断及肿瘤特征数据来自冰岛癌症登记处。

结果

在30年期间,冰岛共有84,677名40 - 69岁女性参加了455,532次有组织的筛查。与50 - 69岁女性相比,40 - 49岁女性的召回率更高(4.9%对3.5%)、参与率更低(60.7%对61.5%)、乳腺癌检出率更低(2.1对6.0/1000)以及筛查敏感性更低(54.8%对70.5%)。在筛查发现的病例中,与50 - 69岁女性相比,40 - 49岁女性肿瘤大于20毫米的比例更高(29.7%对21.7%)、淋巴结阳性比例更高(41.2%对28.2%)以及人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性比例更高(18.6%对11.8%)。

解读

不同年龄组乳腺癌筛查表现的差异可能反映了年轻女性中不可改变的因素。参加筛查的40 - 49岁女性中存在晚期肿瘤特征,这表明早期检测对于改善预后的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/4b6df912078d/AO-64-44090-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/7a3f71f26391/AO-64-44090-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/8c83f34ab868/AO-64-44090-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/db4298a99817/AO-64-44090-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/13321ea5b009/AO-64-44090-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/4b6df912078d/AO-64-44090-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/7a3f71f26391/AO-64-44090-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/8c83f34ab868/AO-64-44090-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/db4298a99817/AO-64-44090-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/13321ea5b009/AO-64-44090-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8121/12372527/4b6df912078d/AO-64-44090-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Thirty years of population-based breast cancer screening in Iceland: a comparison of quality indicators and tumour characteristics between women aged 40-49 and 50-69 years.冰岛三十年基于人群的乳腺癌筛查:40 - 49岁与50 - 69岁女性质量指标和肿瘤特征比较
Acta Oncol. 2025 Aug 14;64:1061-1070. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44090.
2
Clinical outcomes by breast cancers diagnostic modes: A comprehensive evaluation of a national breast cancer screening programme.乳腺癌诊断方式的临床结局:一项全国性乳腺癌筛查计划的综合评估
Cancer Epidemiol. 2025 Aug;97:102821. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2025.102821. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
3
Evaluation of performance indicators of a national breast cancer screening program in Casablanca, Morocco.摩洛哥卡萨布兰卡市一项全国乳腺癌筛查计划的绩效指标评估
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14017-y.
4
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.乳腺 X 线摄影联合乳腺超声与乳腺 X 线摄影用于一般风险女性乳腺癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD009632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009632.pub3.
5
Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography Screening in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌家族史女性的断层合成成像与数字乳腺摄影筛查对比
JAMA Oncol. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1209.
6
Individual and Catchment Area Factors Associated With Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Within the Military Health System.军事卫生系统内与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查相关的个体及集水区因素。
Mil Med. 2025 Jun 30;190(7-8):e1465-e1470. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae525.
7
Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.乳腺癌筛查:为为加拿大预防性医疗保健指南提供信息而进行的系统评价更新
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;13(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02700-3.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.不同原发性乳腺癌治疗后监测性乳房 X 光造影方案的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价注册库分析和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(34):v-vi, 1-322. doi: 10.3310/hta15340.
9
Screening History, Stage at Diagnosis, and Mortality in Screen-Detected Breast Cancer.筛查发现的乳腺癌的筛查史、诊断分期及死亡率
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255322. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5322.
10
Rural-urban difference in female breast cancer diagnosis in Missouri.密苏里州女性乳腺癌诊断的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):3063. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between False-Positive Results and Return to Screening Mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.乳腺癌监测联盟队列中假阳性结果与重返筛查性乳房 X 光检查的关联。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Oct;177(10):1297-1307. doi: 10.7326/M24-0123. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Differences in mammography screening attendance among non-Western immigrants in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway.丹麦、芬兰、冰岛和挪威非西方移民在乳腺钼靶筛查参与率上的差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Nov 19;36:102516. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102516. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and adverse outcome in BRCA2 mutation carriers and young non-carrier patients.
雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌与BRCA2突变携带者及年轻非携带者患者的不良预后
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Nov 30;9(1):95. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00600-8.
4
The New USPSTF Mammography Recommendations - A Dissenting View.美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)关于乳房X光检查的新建议——一种不同意见。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Sep 21;389(12):1061-1064. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2307229. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
5
Does age affect outcome with breast cancer?年龄会影响乳腺癌的预后吗?
Breast. 2023 Aug;70:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
6
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer in population-based breast cancer screening: A short- and long-term perspective.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查中浸润性乳腺癌的过度诊断:短期和长期观点。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Sep;173:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.027. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
7
Participation and cancer detection after reminders versus ordinary invitations in BreastScreen Norway.挪威乳腺 X 光筛查中提醒与普通邀请对参与和癌症检出的影响。
J Med Screen. 2022 Sep;29(3):178-184. doi: 10.1177/09691413221098839. Epub 2022 May 3.
8
Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与乳腺癌筛查就诊相关的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e046660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660.
9
Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Interval Breast Cancers Compared With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers.与筛查检出的乳腺癌相比,间隔期乳腺癌的发病情况、特征和结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2018179. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18179.
10
Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators.乳腺癌筛查项目的监测和评估:选择候选绩效指标。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):795. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07289-z.