Garg Ria, Luo Jin, Bozinoff Nikki, Sproule Beth, Antoniou Tony, Wyman Jennifer, Munro Charlotte, Gomes Tara
ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2527290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.27290.
The increased potency of the fentanyl-dominated drug supply has precipitated a shift in patient-reported opioid tolerance and methadone prescribing guidance. However, adoption of new methadone prescribing approaches remains unknown.
To examine methadone initiation trends within the context of changing prescribing guidance and an increasingly volatile unregulated drug supply.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This repeated cross-sectional study was performed among a cohort of methadone initiations in Ontario, Canada, between January 2015 and July 2023.
Release of new methadone prescribing guidance.
The primary outcomes were monthly rates (per 100 000 Ontario population) of methadone initiated as monotherapy vs in combination with slow-release oral morphine and trends for the maximum methadone dose dispensed on treatment days 1, 2 to 7, and 8 to 14. Interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models were used to examine the association of new guidance with observed trends. Secondary outcomes assessed medication use in the 2 weeks following initiation.
A total of 70 564 initiations of methadone monotherapy and 3069 initiations of combination therapy were identified. Most of the 35 309 unique study participants were aged 25 to 44 years (51 999 episodes [70.6%]) and male (45 212 episodes [61.4%]). The release of new methadone prescribing guidance was associated with a significant decrease in monotherapy initiations (ramp estimate, -0.27 per 100 000; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.07 per 100 000; P = .01), and a parallel increase in combination therapy initiations. Starting in 2018, a shift toward attainment of higher doses was noted. This trend was accelerated following release of new guidance, which was associated with decreased initiation at doses less than 30 mg (ramp estimate, -1.57%; 95% CI, -2.87% to -0.27%; P = .02) and increased attainment of doses of 40 mg to less than 50 mg (ramp estimate, 0.63%; 95% CI, 0.13% to 1.13%; P = .01) in treatment week 1 and 60 mg or higher (ramp estimate, 0.71%; 95% CI, 0.25% to 1.17%; P = .002) in treatment week 2. The proportion of monotherapy episodes without a dose increase in the first 2 weeks increased significantly from 38.5% (18 390 episodes initiated before September 2020) to 45.7% (10 416 episodes) afterward. The absolute amount by which methadone doses were titrated remained generally stable over time.
In this repeated cross-sectional study of methadone initiations, a shift toward higher starting doses and in combination with slow-release oral morphine was noted. Provision of subsequent rapid dose titration remained limited, representing a potential missed opportunity for quicker attainment of therapeutic doses.
以芬太尼为主的毒品供应效力增强,促使患者报告的阿片类药物耐受性及美沙酮处方指南发生转变。然而,新的美沙酮处方方法的采用情况尚不清楚。
在处方指南不断变化以及不受管制的毒品供应日益不稳定的背景下,研究美沙酮起始治疗的趋势。
设计、背景和参与者:这项重复横断面研究在2015年1月至2023年7月期间加拿大安大略省的一组美沙酮起始治疗病例中进行。
新的美沙酮处方指南发布。
主要结局为美沙酮作为单一疗法起始治疗的月发生率(每10万安大略省人口)与联合缓释口服吗啡起始治疗的月发生率,以及治疗第1天、第2至7天和第8至14天所配发美沙酮最大剂量的趋势。采用干预自回归积分滑动平均模型来研究新指南与观察到的趋势之间的关联。次要结局评估起始治疗后2周内的药物使用情况。
共确定了70564例美沙酮单一疗法起始治疗病例和3069例联合疗法起始治疗病例。35309名独特的研究参与者中,大多数年龄在25至44岁(51999例[70.6%]),且为男性(45212例[61.4%])。新的美沙酮处方指南发布与单一疗法起始治疗显著减少相关(斜率估计值,每10万例中减少0.27;95%置信区间,每10万例中减少0.48至 -0.07;P = 0.01),联合疗法起始治疗则相应增加。从2018年开始,出现了朝着更高剂量发展的趋势。新指南发布后,这一趋势加速,与治疗第1周剂量低于30毫克时起始治疗减少相关(斜率估计值, -1.57%;95%置信区间, -2.87%至 -0.27%;P = 0.02),以及治疗第2周剂量达到40毫克至不足50毫克时起始治疗增加相关(斜率估计值,0.63%;95%置信区间,0.13%至1.13%;P = 0.01),且剂量达到60毫克或更高时起始治疗增加相关(斜率估计值,0.71%;95%置信区间,0.25%至1.17%;P = 0.002)。单一疗法病例在开始的2周内未增加剂量的比例从38.5%(2020年9月之前起始治疗的18390例)显著增加至45.7%(10416例)。随着时间推移,美沙酮剂量滴定的绝对量总体保持稳定。
在这项关于美沙酮起始治疗的重复横断面研究中,注意到了朝着更高起始剂量以及联合缓释口服吗啡治疗的转变。后续快速剂量滴定的情况仍然有限,这可能意味着错失了更快达到治疗剂量的机会。