Taylor Crystal D, Niba Vanessa S, Baskin Alison S, Mott Nicole M, Kim Erin, Kappelman Abigail, Wang Ton, Sinco Brandy R, Francescatti Amanda B, Boffa Daniel J, Hendren Samantha, Boughey Judy C, Hieken Tina J, Weigel Ronald J, Hughes Tasha M, Dossett Lesly A
Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18063-5.
The operative standard for melanoma, implemented by the Commission on Cancer (CoC), addresses margin width and excision depth, but does not collect information on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). However, SLNB, an implemented technical standard in breast cancer, is also critical in the management of melanoma through its impact on nodal staging. This study aimed to characterize the current facility-level variation in nodal yield and nodal positivity to determine if there is an opportunity for improvement through standardization.
Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with T1b-T4 melanoma of the trunk and upper extremities who underwent SLNB from 2018 to 2022. Reliability-adjusted estimates for nodal yield and nodal positivity were calculated using Poisson regression and logistic regression with random intercepts for hospitals.
We identified 48,653 melanoma patients from 1167 facilities. SLNB median nodal yield was 2.4 (IQR 2.2-2.7), ranging from 1.4 to 7.0. SLNB median nodal positivity was 18.0% (IQR 17.1-19.5%), ranging from 11.6 to 40.5%. A weak correlation between nodal yield and nodal positivity was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.08, p = 0.009).
Facility-level variation in nodal yield was minimal and weakly correlated with nodal positivity. This suggests that SLNB performed for melanoma of the trunk and upper extremities is well standardized across CoC hospitals in the absence of a defined operative standard. Future efforts to improve the quality of melanoma nodal surgery may be best focused on technical elements of other procedures, such as lymphadenectomy or more novel lymph node dissection approaches following neoadjuvant therapy.
癌症委员会(CoC)实施的黑色素瘤手术标准涉及切缘宽度和切除深度,但未收集前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的信息。然而,SLNB作为乳腺癌已实施的技术标准,通过其对淋巴结分期的影响,在黑色素瘤的管理中也至关重要。本研究旨在描述当前机构层面淋巴结获取量和淋巴结阳性率的差异,以确定是否有通过标准化来改进的机会。
利用国家癌症数据库,我们确定了2018年至2022年期间接受SLNB的躯干和上肢T1b - T4期黑色素瘤患者。使用泊松回归和具有医院随机截距的逻辑回归计算淋巴结获取量和淋巴结阳性率的可靠性调整估计值。
我们从1167个机构中识别出48653例黑色素瘤患者。SLNB的中位淋巴结获取量为2.4(四分位间距2.2 - 2.7),范围为1.4至7.0。SLNB的中位淋巴结阳性率为18.0%(四分位间距17.1 - 19.5%),范围为11.6%至40.5%。观察到淋巴结获取量与淋巴结阳性率之间存在弱相关性(斯皮尔曼相关系数 = 0.08,p = 0.009)。
机构层面的淋巴结获取量差异最小,且与淋巴结阳性率弱相关。这表明在没有明确手术标准的情况下,CoC医院对躯干和上肢黑色素瘤进行的SLNB已得到很好的标准化。未来提高黑色素瘤淋巴结手术质量的努力可能最好集中在其他手术的技术要素上,如淋巴结清扫术或新辅助治疗后更新颖的淋巴结清扫方法。