• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺血性脑卒中患者胃肠道出血的危险因素及预测模型:一项病例对照研究。

Risk factors and predictive model for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with ischemic stroke: a case-control study.

作者信息

Feng Kaijun, Song Qiuming, Xue Ming

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Third People's Hospital of Hefei (Hefei Third Clinical College of Anhui Medical University) Hefei 230022, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jul 15;17(7):5011-5024. doi: 10.62347/EOOS8728. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.62347/EOOS8728
PMID:40821074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12351567/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with ischemic stroke and to develop a clinically applicable predictive model.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted on ischemic stroke patients admitted to The Third People's Hospital of Hefei. The training cohort included 96 patients who developed GIB between January 2021 and January 2023 (as cases) and 104 age-matched stroke patients who did not develop GIB (as controls). Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A separate validation cohort (40 GIB-cases and 48 controls) admitted between February 2023 and June 2024 was used to assess model's performance.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis identified several significant risk factors, including a history of gastrointestinal diseases, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs, a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤ 8, and prolonged prothrombin time (PT). Multivariate analysis showed that all four factors were independent predictors: history of stomach or intestinal disease (odds ratio [OR]=3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-10.49), use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs (OR=4.09, 95% CI: 1.68-9.99), GCS score ≤8 (OR=4.75, 95% CI: 1.18-19.16), and prolonged PT (OR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.28). A predictive nomogram based on these four factors demonstrated good performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 in the training cohort and 0.79 in the validation cohort. The calibration curve indicated that the nomogram's predictions matched closely with real outcomes. The decision curve analysis (DCA) also showed that the model provided evident clinical benefits.

CONCLUSION

Four independent risk factors for GIB in ischemic stroke patients were identified. The developed nomogram may assist clinicians in early risk assessment and inform treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

确定缺血性脑卒中患者发生胃肠道出血(GIB)的危险因素,并建立一个临床适用的预测模型。

方法

对合肥市第三人民医院收治的缺血性脑卒中患者进行回顾性病例对照研究。训练队列包括2021年1月至2023年1月期间发生GIB的96例患者(作为病例组)和104例年龄匹配的未发生GIB的脑卒中患者(作为对照组)。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定危险因素。2023年2月至2024年6月期间收治的一个单独的验证队列(40例GIB病例和48例对照)用于评估模型的性能。

结果

单因素分析确定了几个显著的危险因素,包括胃肠道疾病史、使用抗凝剂或抗血小板药物、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤8以及凝血酶原时间(PT)延长。多因素分析显示,所有这四个因素都是独立的预测因素:胃或肠道疾病史(比值比[OR]=3.31,95%置信区间[CI]:1.04-10.49)、使用抗凝剂或抗血小板药物(OR=4.09,95%CI:1.68-9.99)、GCS评分≤8(OR=4.75,95%CI:1.18-19.16)以及PT延长(OR=1.15,95%CI:1.04-1.28)。基于这四个因素的预测列线图表现良好,训练队列中的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.73,验证队列中的AUC为0.79。校准曲线表明列线图的预测与实际结果密切匹配。决策曲线分析(DCA)也表明该模型具有明显的临床益处。

结论

确定了缺血性脑卒中患者发生GIB的四个独立危险因素。所建立的列线图可帮助临床医生进行早期风险评估并为治疗决策提供参考。

相似文献

1
Risk factors and predictive model for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with ischemic stroke: a case-control study.缺血性脑卒中患者胃肠道出血的危险因素及预测模型:一项病例对照研究。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jul 15;17(7):5011-5024. doi: 10.62347/EOOS8728. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
[Construction of a predictive model for hospital-acquired pneumonia risk in patients with mild traumatic brain injury based on LASSO-Logistic regression analysis].基于LASSO-逻辑回归分析构建轻度创伤性脑损伤患者医院获得性肺炎风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Apr;37(4):374-380. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240823-00715.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Sex-based differences in inflammatory predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: an inverse probability weighting analysis.接受机械取栓治疗患者结局的炎症预测指标中的性别差异:逆概率加权分析
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Jun 21;18:17562864251345719. doi: 10.1177/17562864251345719. eCollection 2025.
8
Development of a model for predicting gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with ischemic stroke after dual antiplatelet therapy.双重抗血小板治疗后缺血性卒中患者胃肠道出血预测模型的开发。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1574278. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1574278. eCollection 2025.
9
Integrating Neutrophil-To-Albumin Ratio and Triglycerides: A Novel Indicator for Predicting Spontaneous Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值和甘油三酯的整合:急性缺血性卒中患者自发性出血转化的新型预测指标。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Dec;30(12):e70133. doi: 10.1111/cns.70133.
10
An individualized nomogram for predicting risk of sepsis in patients with pyogenic liver abscesses: a 10 years retrospective analysis.预测化脓性肝脓肿患者脓毒症风险的个体化列线图:一项10年回顾性分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 9;12:1555656. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1555656. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The River study: the first prospective multicenter trial of a novel venous sinus stent for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.“河流”研究:一项关于新型静脉窦支架治疗特发性颅内高压的首次前瞻性多中心试验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022540.
2
Long-Term Incidence of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Following Ischemic Stroke.缺血性中风后胃肠道出血的长期发生率
J Stroke. 2025 Jan;27(1):102-112. doi: 10.5853/jos.2024.00661. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
3
Does enteral nutrition protect against stress ulceration in the critically ill?肠内营养能否预防危重症患者的应激性溃疡?
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2025 Mar 1;28(2):123-128. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000001097. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
4
CHA2DS2-VA instead of CHA2DS2-VASc for stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation: not just a matter of sex.房颤患者卒中风险分层采用CHA2DS2-VA而非CHA2DS2-VASc:不仅仅是性别的问题。
Europace. 2024 Nov 1;26(11). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae281.
5
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素,1990-2021 年:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Oct;23(10):973-1003. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00369-7.
6
Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: A propensity score matching analysis.脑出血患者胃肠道出血的风险因素:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Sep;127:110772. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110772. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
7
Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model Compared With Clinical Risk Scores for Gastrointestinal Bleeding.基于电子病历的机器学习模型与临床风险评分对胃肠道出血的验证比较。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Nov;167(6):1198-1212. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.06.030. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
8
Advancements in hemostatic strategies for managing upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A comprehensive review.止血策略在治疗上消化道出血中的进展:全面综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 21;30(15):2087-2090. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i15.2087.
9
Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Literature Review.急性缺血性卒中患者的消化道出血:文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):e53210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53210. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Endoscopic Diagnosis, Grading, and Treatment of Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Disease.内镜诊断、分级和出血性消化性溃疡病的治疗。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2024 Apr;34(2):217-229. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 22.