• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠内营养能否预防危重症患者的应激性溃疡?

Does enteral nutrition protect against stress ulceration in the critically ill?

作者信息

Borthwick Mark, Jenkins Bethan, Wischmeyer Paul E, Barletta Jeffrey F

机构信息

Departments of Pharmacy and Critical Care, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford.

Department of Dietetics, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton.

出版信息

Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2025 Mar 1;28(2):123-128. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000001097. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1097/MCO.0000000000001097
PMID:39750129
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Critically ill patients are at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) due to stress ulceration. Strategies to reduce the risk include administration of prophylactic ulcer healing medications. Enteral nutrition (EN) may be favourably associated with GIB risks. This manuscript summarizes available evidence regarding EN effects on GIB.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are few data available to directly compare the effect of EN on GIB. Direct comparison in animal models generally indicate a beneficial effect. Human data provide indirect evidence from pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis studies. EN exposure has been randomized in nutrition trials of critically ill patients, but GIB outcomes were not recorded. Detailed EN exposure data were recorded in two large pharmacological stress ulcer trials. One finds EN is associated with lower GIB, lower mortality, and increased pneumonia, and notes a possible interaction between EN and pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis. The second has yet to report associations with EN.

SUMMARY

EN may reduce the risk of GIB, although robust direct evidence is absent. Potential interactions between EN and pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis require further study.

摘要

综述目的

危重症患者因应激性溃疡有发生胃肠道出血(GIB)的风险。降低该风险的策略包括使用预防性溃疡愈合药物。肠内营养(EN)可能与GIB风险存在有利关联。本文总结了关于EN对GIB影响的现有证据。

最新发现

几乎没有数据可直接比较EN对GIB的影响。动物模型中的直接比较通常显示出有益效果。人体数据从药物性应激性溃疡预防研究中提供了间接证据。在危重症患者的营养试验中,EN暴露已被随机化,但未记录GIB结局。在两项大型药物性应激性溃疡试验中记录了详细的EN暴露数据。一项研究发现EN与较低的GIB、较低的死亡率以及肺炎增加相关,并指出EN与药物性应激性溃疡预防之间可能存在相互作用。第二项研究尚未报告与EN的关联。

总结

尽管缺乏有力的直接证据,但EN可能降低GIB风险。EN与药物性应激性溃疡预防之间的潜在相互作用需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Does enteral nutrition protect against stress ulceration in the critically ill?肠内营养能否预防危重症患者的应激性溃疡?
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2025 Mar 1;28(2):123-128. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000001097. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Re-evaluating the Utility of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Critically Ill Patient: A Clinical Scenario-Based Meta-Analysis.重新评估危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的作用:基于临床情景的荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):408-420. doi: 10.1002/phar.2172. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
3
The value of early enteral nutrition in the prophylaxis of stress ulceration in the severely burned patient.早期肠内营养在重度烧伤患者应激性溃疡预防中的价值。
Burns. 1997 Jun;23(4):313-8. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(97)89875-0.
4
Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists in critically ill adults - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.重症成人患者使用质子泵抑制剂或组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防应激性溃疡 - 随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1105-y.
5
Comparing efficacy of enteral nutrition plus ranitidine and enteral nutrition alone as stress ulcer prophylaxis.比较肠内营养联合雷尼替丁与单纯肠内营养预防应激性溃疡的疗效。
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 May;7(5):493-501. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0098. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
Enteral nutrition as stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled exploratory study.肠内营养作为危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的作用:一项随机对照探索性研究。
J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.036. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
7
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the new millennium: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新千年的应激性溃疡预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2222-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f17adf.
8
Prophylactic acid suppression and enteral nutrition.预防性抑酸与肠内营养。
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2023 Mar 1;26(2):174-178. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000910. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
9
Stress ulcer prophylaxis plus enteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition alone in critically ill patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding: a propensity-matched analysis.应激性溃疡预防加肠内营养与单纯肠内营养用于有胃肠道出血风险的危重症患者:一项倾向匹配分析
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1948-1949. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06136-w. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
10
Associations between enteral nutrition and outcomes in the SUP-ICU trial: Protocol for exploratory post hoc analyses.SUP-ICU 试验中肠内营养与结局的相关性:探索性事后分析方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Apr;67(4):481-486. doi: 10.1111/aas.14194. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and predictive model for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with ischemic stroke: a case-control study.缺血性脑卒中患者胃肠道出血的危险因素及预测模型:一项病例对照研究。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jul 15;17(7):5011-5024. doi: 10.62347/EOOS8728. eCollection 2025.
2
Stress ulcer prophylaxis practice in UK critical care units: A comparison of cross-sectional surveys between 2020 and 2024.英国重症监护病房应激性溃疡预防措施的实践:2020年至2024年横断面调查的比较
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 May 26:17511437251338614. doi: 10.1177/17511437251338614.