Suppr超能文献

抑郁症治疗对基层医疗患者主观睡眠成分的影响:来自eIMPACT试验的数据。

Effect of depression treatment on subjective sleep components among primary care patients: Data from the eIMPACT trial.

作者信息

Schuiling Matthew D, Wu Wei, Polanka Brittanny M, Shell Aubrey L, Williams Michelle K, Crawford Christopher A, MacDonald Krysha L, Nurnberger John I, Callahan Christopher M, Stewart Jesse C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Indiana University Indianapolis, United States.

Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, United States.

出版信息

J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2025 Jun 3;11:100132. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100132. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sleep disturbance is a multifaceted symptom of depression that disproportionately impacts marginalized groups. Depression treatment improves sleep disturbance in some individuals; however, the components of sleep disturbance improved remain unidentified. This secondary analysis of the eIMPACT randomized controlled trial examines effects of depression treatment on subjective sleep disturbance components.

METHODS

216 primary care patients with depression from a safety net healthcare system were randomized to 12-months of modernized collaborative care (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and/or antidepressants;  = 107) or usual primary care for depression (primary care providers supported by embedded behavioral health clinicians and psychiatrists;  = 109). Subjective sleep disturbance components were assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

RESULTS

Mixed-effect models examined intervention effects on changes in subjective sleep disturbance components. The intervention improved PSQI global scores, sleep onset latency, subjective sleep quality, and daytime dysfunction across 24-months, and these effects diminished after treatment termination. At post-treatment, intervention participants had greater improvements in PSQI global scores ( < 0.001, =-0.62), sleep onset latency ( < 0.01, =-0.43), daytime dysfunction ( < 0.01, =-0.35), and sleep disturbances ( = 0.01, =-0.26) compared to usual care, but no differences in subjective sleep quality, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, or sleep medication use. Intervention effects were not moderated by race, education, or income. Pre- to post-treatment improvements in depressive symptoms were associated with improvements in some sleep disturbance components.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression treatment improves some, not all, subjective sleep disturbance components, with benefits diminishing after termination. Adjunctive interventions are likely needed to address the lingering components of sleep disturbance.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENIFIER

NCT02458690.

摘要

目的

睡眠障碍是抑郁症的一个多方面症状,对边缘化群体的影响尤为严重。抑郁症治疗可改善部分个体的睡眠障碍;然而,睡眠障碍中哪些成分得到改善仍不明确。这项对eIMPACT随机对照试验的二次分析研究了抑郁症治疗对主观睡眠障碍成分的影响。

方法

216名来自安全网医疗系统的抑郁症初级护理患者被随机分为两组,一组接受为期12个月的现代化协作护理(互联网认知行为疗法[CBT]、电话CBT和/或抗抑郁药;n = 107),另一组接受抑郁症常规初级护理(由嵌入式行为健康临床医生和精神科医生支持的初级护理提供者;n = 109)。主观睡眠障碍成分通过匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)进行评估。

结果

混合效应模型检验了干预对主观睡眠障碍成分变化的影响。干预在24个月内改善了PSQI总分、入睡潜伏期、主观睡眠质量和日间功能障碍,且这些效果在治疗终止后减弱。治疗后,与常规护理相比,干预组参与者在PSQI总分(P < 0.001,d = -0.62)、入睡潜伏期(P < 0.01,d = -0.43)、日间功能障碍(P < 0.01,d = -0.35)和睡眠障碍(P = 0.01,d = -0.26)方面有更大改善,但在主观睡眠质量、总睡眠时间、睡眠效率或睡眠药物使用方面无差异。干预效果不受种族、教育程度或收入的影响。治疗前后抑郁症状的改善与某些睡眠障碍成分的改善相关。

结论

抑郁症治疗改善了部分而非全部主观睡眠障碍成分,且治疗终止后益处减弱。可能需要辅助干预来解决睡眠障碍中持续存在的成分。

临床试验标识符

NCT02458690。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验