McCleery Jenny, Cohen Daniel A, Sharpley Ann L
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Elms Centre, Oxford Road, Banbury, Oxfordshire, UK, OX16 9AL.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):CD009178. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009178.pub3.
Sleep disturbances, including reduced nocturnal sleep time, sleep fragmentation, nocturnal wandering, and daytime sleepiness are common clinical problems in dementia, and are associated with significant caregiver distress, increased healthcare costs, and institutionalisation. Drug treatment is often sought to alleviate these problems, but there is significant uncertainty about the efficacy and adverse effects of the various hypnotic drugs in this vulnerable population.
To assess the effects, including common adverse effects, of any drug treatment versus placebo for sleep disorders in people with dementia, through identification and analysis of all relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
We searched ALOIS (www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois), the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register, in March 2013 and again in March 2016, using the terms: sleep, insomnia, circadian, hypersomnia, parasomnia, somnolence, rest-activity, sundowning.
We included RCTs that compared a drug with placebo, and that had the primary aim of improving sleep in people with dementia who had an identified sleep disturbance at baseline. Trials could also include non-pharmacological interventions, as long as both drug and placebo groups had the same exposure to them.
Two review authors independently extracted data on study design, risk of bias, and results from the included study reports. We obtained additional information from study authors where necessary. We used the mean difference as the measure of treatment effect, and where possible, synthesized results using a fixed-effect model.
We found six RCTs eligible for inclusion for three drugs: melatonin (222 participants, four studies, but only two yielded data on our primary sleep outcomes suitable for meta-analysis), trazodone (30 participants, one study), and ramelteon (74 participants, one study, no peer-reviewed publication, limited information available).The participants in the trazodone study and almost all participants in the melatonin studies had moderate-to-severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD); those in the ramelteon study had mild-to-moderate AD. Participants had a variety of common sleep problems at baseline. All primary sleep outcomes were measured using actigraphy. In one study of melatonin, drug treatment was combined with morning bright light therapy. Only two studies made a systematic assessment of adverse effects. Overall, the evidence was at low risk of bias, although there were areas of incomplete reporting, some problems with participant attrition, related largely to poor tolerance of actigraphy and technical difficulties, and a high risk of selective reporting in one trial that contributed very few participants. The risk of bias in the ramelteon study was unclear due to incomplete reporting.We found no evidence that melatonin, at doses up to 10 mg, improved any major sleep outcome over 8 to 10 weeks in patients with AD who were identified as having a sleep disturbance. We were able to synthesize data for two of our primary sleep outcomes: total nocturnal sleep time (mean difference (MD) 10.68 minutes, 95% CI -16.22 to 37.59; N = 184; two studies), and the ratio of daytime sleep to night-time sleep (MD -0.13, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.03; N = 184; two studies). From single studies, we found no difference between melatonin and placebo groups for sleep efficiency, time awake after sleep onset, or number of night-time awakenings. From two studies, we found no effect of melatonin on cognition or performance of activities of daily living (ADL). No serious adverse effects of melatonin were reported in the included studies. We considered this evidence to be of low quality.There was low-quality evidence that trazodone 50 mg given at night for two weeks improved total nocturnal sleep time (MD 42.46 minutes, 95% CI 0.9 to 84.0; N = 30; one study), and sleep efficiency (MD 8.53%, 95% CI 1.9 to 15.1; N = 30; one study) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, but it did not affect the amount of time spent awake after sleep onset (MD -20.41, 95% CI -60.4 to 19.6; N = 30; one study), or the number of nocturnal awakenings (MD -3.71, 95% CI -8.2 to 0.8; N = 30; one study). No effect was seen on daytime sleep, cognition, or ADL. No serious adverse effects of trazodone were reported.Results from a phase 2 trial investigating ramelteon 8 mg administered at night were available in summary form in a sponsor's synopsis. Because the data were from a single, small study and reporting was incomplete, we considered this evidence to be of low quality in general terms. Ramelteon had no effect on total nocturnal sleep time at one week (primary outcome) or eight weeks (end of treatment) in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. The synopsis reported few significant differences from placebo for any sleep, behavioural, or cognitive outcomes; none were likely to be of clinical significance. There were no serious adverse effects from ramelteon.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We discovered a distinct lack of evidence to help guide drug treatment of sleep problems in dementia. In particular, we found no RCTs of many drugs that are widely prescribed for sleep problems in dementia, including the benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, although there is considerable uncertainty about the balance of benefits and risks associated with these common treatments. From the studies we identified for this review, we found no evidence that melatonin (up to 10mg) helped sleep problems in patients with moderate to severe dementia due to AD. There was some evidence to support the use of a low dose (50 mg) of trazodone, although a larger trial is needed to allow a more definitive conclusion to be reached on the balance of risks and benefits. There was no evidence of any effect of ramelteon on sleep in patients with mild to moderate dementia due to AD. This is an area with a high need for pragmatic trials, particularly of those drugs that are in common clinical use for sleep problems in dementia. Systematic assessment of adverse effects is essential.
睡眠障碍,包括夜间睡眠时间减少、睡眠片段化、夜间徘徊和日间嗜睡,是痴呆症常见的临床问题,与护理人员的严重困扰、医疗费用增加和机构化有关。人们常常寻求药物治疗来缓解这些问题,但对于各种催眠药物在这一脆弱人群中的疗效和不良反应存在很大的不确定性。
通过识别和分析所有相关的随机对照试验(RCT),评估任何药物治疗与安慰剂相比对痴呆症患者睡眠障碍的影响,包括常见的不良反应。
我们于2013年3月和2016年3月检索了ALOIS(www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois),即考克兰痴呆与认知改善小组的专业注册库,检索词为:睡眠、失眠、昼夜节律、睡眠过多、异态睡眠、嗜睡、静息-活动、日落综合征。
我们纳入了将一种药物与安慰剂进行比较的RCT,其主要目的是改善基线时已确定存在睡眠障碍的痴呆症患者的睡眠。试验也可包括非药物干预,只要药物组和安慰剂组对其接触程度相同。
两位综述作者独立从纳入的研究报告中提取有关研究设计、偏倚风险和结果的数据。必要时,我们从研究作者处获取了更多信息。我们使用平均差作为治疗效果的衡量指标,并在可能的情况下,使用固定效应模型综合结果。
我们发现有六项RCT符合纳入三种药物的标准:褪黑素(222名参与者,四项研究,但只有两项产生了适用于荟萃分析的主要睡眠结果数据)、曲唑酮(30名参与者,一项研究)和雷美替胺(74名参与者,一项研究,无同行评审出版物,可用信息有限)。曲唑酮研究中的参与者以及褪黑素研究中几乎所有参与者均患有因阿尔茨海默病(AD)导致的中度至重度痴呆;雷美替胺研究中的参与者患有轻度至中度AD。参与者在基线时存在各种常见的睡眠问题。所有主要睡眠结果均使用活动记录仪进行测量。在一项褪黑素研究中,药物治疗与早晨强光疗法相结合。只有两项研究对不良反应进行了系统评估。总体而言,证据的偏倚风险较低,尽管存在报告不完整的情况、一些参与者流失问题(主要与活动记录仪耐受性差和技术困难有关),以及一项参与者很少的试验中存在较高的选择性报告风险。由于报告不完整,雷美替胺研究中的偏倚风险尚不清楚。我们没有发现证据表明,在8至10周内,剂量高达10mg的褪黑素能改善被确定存在睡眠障碍的AD患者的任何主要睡眠结果。我们能够综合两项主要睡眠结果的数据:夜间总睡眠时间(平均差(MD)10.68分钟,95%CI -16.22至37.59;N = 184;两项研究),以及日间睡眠与夜间睡眠的比例(MD -0.13,95%CI -0.29至0.03;N = 184;两项研究)。从单项研究中,我们发现褪黑素组与安慰剂组在睡眠效率、睡眠开始后清醒时间或夜间觉醒次数方面没有差异。从两项研究中,我们发现褪黑素对认知或日常生活活动(ADL)表现没有影响。纳入的研究中未报告褪黑素的严重不良反应。我们认为该证据质量较低。有低质量证据表明,夜间服用50mg曲唑酮两周可改善中度至重度AD患者的夜间总睡眠时间(MD 42.46分钟,95%CI 0.9至84.0;N = 30;一项研究)和睡眠效率(MD 8.53%,95%CI 1.9至15.1;N = 30;一项研究),但对睡眠开始后清醒时间(MD -20.41,95%CI -60.4至19.6;N = 30;一项研究)或夜间觉醒次数(MD -3.71,95%CI -8.2至0.8;N = 30;一项研究)没有影响。对日间睡眠、认知或ADL没有影响。未报告曲唑酮的严重不良反应。一项研究雷美替胺8mg夜间给药的2期试验结果以主办方摘要的形式提供。由于数据来自一项单一的小型研究且报告不完整,总体而言,我们认为该证据质量较低。雷美替胺对轻度至中度AD患者的夜间总睡眠时间在一周(主要结局)或八周(治疗结束)时没有影响。摘要报告称,在任何睡眠、行为或认知结局方面,与安慰剂相比几乎没有显著差异;可能均无临床意义。雷美替胺未出现严重不良反应。
我们发现明显缺乏有助于指导痴呆症睡眠问题药物治疗的证据。特别是,我们没有发现许多广泛用于治疗痴呆症睡眠问题的药物的RCT,包括苯二氮䓬类和非苯二氮䓬类催眠药,尽管这些常见治疗方法的利弊平衡存在很大不确定性。从我们为本次综述所识别的研究中,我们没有发现证据表明褪黑素(高达10mg)有助于改善中度至重度AD痴呆症患者的睡眠问题。有一些证据支持使用低剂量(50mg)的曲唑酮,尽管需要进行更大规模的试验才能就风险和益处的平衡得出更明确的结论。没有证据表明雷美替胺对轻度至中度AD痴呆症患者的睡眠有任何影响。这是一个非常需要务实试验的领域,尤其是针对那些临床上常用于治疗痴呆症睡眠问题的药物。对不良反应进行系统评估至关重要。