Gupta Saurabh, Yadav Dinesh, Anubhuti Anubhuti, Siddiqui Lubna Tabassum, Rudrappa Deepa, KalamAzad Abdul, Sahoo Alkananda
Consultant, Periodontist and Implantologist, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ekalavya Dental College & Hospital, Rajasthan, India.
Bioinformation. 2025 May 31;21(5):1002-1006. doi: 10.6026/973206300211002. eCollection 2025.
Dental implant placement requires high precision and advancements in technology, such as AI-assisted surgical guides. Therefore, it is of interest to compare AI-assisted surgical guides, conventional guides and freehand techniques in dental implant placement. Hence, 75 artificial jaw models were divided into three groups of 25 each. The implants were placed using standardized methods. The AI guides were created using machine learning software (PlanmecaRomexis®, India). Statistical analysis (SPSS v25) used Shapiro-Wilk, Levene's test, ANOVA with Tukey, p<0.05, and ICC for reliability.AI-assisted surgical guides offer superior accuracy, stability and implant success rates.
牙种植体植入需要高精度以及技术进步,比如人工智能辅助手术导板。因此,比较人工智能辅助手术导板、传统导板和徒手技术在牙种植体植入中的效果很有意义。于是,75个人工颌骨模型被分为三组,每组25个。使用标准化方法植入种植体。人工智能导板通过机器学习软件(普兰梅卡Romexis®,印度)创建。统计分析(SPSS v25)采用夏皮罗-威尔克检验、莱文检验、带图基检验的方差分析,p<0.05,以及用于可靠性分析的组内相关系数(ICC)。人工智能辅助手术导板具有更高的准确性、稳定性和种植成功率。