• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的糖尿病足患者心血管不良事件风险的相关性研究——一项回顾性队列研究

Correlation study on the risk of cardiovascular adverse events in diabetic foot patients based on machine learning - a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Zheng Liran, Chen Jiageng, Xu Wenyan, Ding Min, Li Juan, Tian Fenghua, Zhang Lei, Li Qianqian, Wang Shuai, Wang Zeyu, Ma Hairong, Cui Xuecan, Chang Bai, Wang Meijun

机构信息

NHC Key Lab of Hormones and Development and Tianjin Key Lab of Metabolic Diseases, Tianjin Medical University Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital & Institute of Endocrinology, Tianjin, China.

Human Resources Department, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 1;16:1595471. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1595471. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2025.1595471
PMID:40822962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12353740/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic Foot (DF), as a serious complication of diabetes, is closely related to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality. However, research on predictive models for the MACE risk in DF patients is not sufficient. The purpose of this study is to construct a prognostic model for the MACE risk in patients with diabetic foot ulcers and provide a reference tool for clinical individualized management.

METHOD

This study retrospectively collected data of DF patients who were hospitalized and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in a tertiary first-class comprehensive hospital mainly engaged in metabolic diseases in Tianjin from January 2018 to January 2020. The follow-up outcome was the occurrence of MACE within 5 years after discharge. Multiple imputation (MI) method was used to fill in the missing data. Based on the processed data, in terms of modeling methods, the top three frequently used methods were used. Logistic regression, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) were used respectively to analyze influencing factors. The performance of each model was compared by using confusion matrix, ROC curve and AUC value. The data set was divided into training set and test set according to the proportion of 80%/20%. Finally, the model effect was verified on the test set. The study finally included a total of 504 patients with DF. Among them, 147 cases (29.17%) experienced MACE events within five years. The AUC of the RF model in this study was 0.70, the AUC of the Logistic regression model was 0.62, and the AUC of the SVM model was 0.60.

CONCLUSION

All three models established in this research have good clinical predictive ability. Among them, the clinical prediction model based on RF has the best effect and can effectively predict the risk of MACE in DF patients, helping clinical medical staff formulate personalized treatment plans.

摘要

引言

糖尿病足(DF)作为糖尿病的一种严重并发症,与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及死亡率密切相关。然而,关于DF患者MACE风险预测模型的研究尚不充分。本研究旨在构建糖尿病足溃疡患者MACE风险的预后模型,为临床个体化管理提供参考工具。

方法

本研究回顾性收集了2018年1月至2020年1月在天津一家主要从事代谢疾病的三级甲等综合性医院住院且符合纳入和排除标准的DF患者的数据。随访结局为出院后5年内MACE的发生情况。采用多重填补(MI)方法填补缺失数据。基于处理后的数据,在建模方法方面,使用了三种常用的方法。分别采用逻辑回归、随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)分析影响因素。通过混淆矩阵、ROC曲线和AUC值比较各模型的性能。数据集按照80%/20%的比例分为训练集和测试集。最后,在测试集上验证模型效果。本研究最终共纳入504例DF患者。其中,147例(29.17%)在5年内发生了MACE事件。本研究中RF模型的AUC为0.70,逻辑回归模型的AUC为0.62,SVM模型的AUC为0.60。

结论

本研究建立的三种模型均具有良好的临床预测能力。其中,基于RF的临床预测模型效果最佳,能够有效预测DF患者发生MACE的风险,有助于临床医务人员制定个性化治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e6/12353740/8927b4528d63/fendo-16-1595471-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e6/12353740/661391567817/fendo-16-1595471-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e6/12353740/d9ca77d1c67d/fendo-16-1595471-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e6/12353740/8927b4528d63/fendo-16-1595471-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e6/12353740/661391567817/fendo-16-1595471-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e6/12353740/d9ca77d1c67d/fendo-16-1595471-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e6/12353740/8927b4528d63/fendo-16-1595471-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation study on the risk of cardiovascular adverse events in diabetic foot patients based on machine learning - a retrospective cohort study.基于机器学习的糖尿病足患者心血管不良事件风险的相关性研究——一项回顾性队列研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 1;16:1595471. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1595471. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
6
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.生物标志物对改良心脏风险指数在预测非心脏手术患者主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率方面的比较和附加预后价值。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2.
7
Development of Machine Learning-based Algorithms to Predict the 2- and 5-year Risk of TKA After Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment.基于机器学习的算法用于预测胫骨平台骨折治疗后2年和5年全膝关节置换风险的研究进展
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003442.
8
Establishment and validation of an interactive artificial intelligence platform to predict postoperative ambulatory status for patients with metastatic spinal disease: a multicenter analysis.建立和验证交互式人工智能平台,以预测转移性脊柱疾病患者的术后活动状态:一项多中心分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2738-2756. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001169.
9
Machine learning-based model for predicting all-cause mortality in severe pneumonia.基于机器学习的重症肺炎全因死亡率预测模型。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Mar 22;12(1):e001983. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001983.
10
Topical antimicrobial agents for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes.用于治疗糖尿病患者足部溃疡的局部抗菌剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 14;6(6):CD011038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011038.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of post-healing recurrence in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病足溃疡患者愈合后复发的预测因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Tissue Viability. 2024 Nov;33(4):542-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.07.002.
2
Diabetic foot disease carries an intrinsic high risk of mortality and other severe outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a propensity score-matched retrospective population-based study.糖尿病足病在 2 型糖尿病患者中具有较高的死亡率和其他严重后果的内在风险:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性基于人群的研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Jun 19;23(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02303-1.
3
Diabetic foot ulcer is associated with cardiovascular-related mortality and morbidity - a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8062 patients.
糖尿病足溃疡与心血管相关死亡率和发病率相关-8062 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2024 Jun;84(3):852-863. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03696-5. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
4
Independent association of history of diabetic foot with all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Renal Insufficiency And Cardiovascular Events (RIACE) Italian Multicenter Study.糖尿病足病史与 2 型糖尿病患者全因死亡率的独立相关性:肾脏功能不全和心血管事件(RIACE)意大利多中心研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Jan 13;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02107-9.
5
Etiology, Epidemiology, and Disparities in the Burden of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡的病因、流行病学和负担差异。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(1):209-221. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0043.
6
Global mortality of diabetic foot ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.糖尿病足溃疡的全球死亡率:观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jan;25(1):36-45. doi: 10.1111/dom.14840. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
7
Inflammation in Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.心力衰竭中的炎症:JACC 最新综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Mar 24;75(11):1324-1340. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.014.
8
Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).《糖尿病患者足部溃疡预防指南(IWGDF 2019 更新版)》。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3269. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3269.
9
Long term outcomes after incident diabetic foot ulcer: Multicenter large cohort prospective study (EDI-FOCUS investigators) epidemiology of diabetic foot complications study: Epidemiology of diabetic foot complications study.糖尿病足溃疡后长期结局:多中心大队列前瞻性研究(EDI-FOCUS 研究者) 糖尿病足并发症研究的流行病学:糖尿病足并发症研究的流行病学。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;162:108113. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108113. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡
JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):114. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18323.