Coşa Lucica Emilia, Cernat Vasile
Department of Teacher Training, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mureş, Târgu Mureş, Romania.
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 1;16:1650271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1650271. eCollection 2025.
This study examines the predictive roles of personality traits, rational/irrational beliefs, and self-efficacy in academic performance, while also investigating how these factors interact with gender, residence, and school type.
Data were collected from 453 students at George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology in Târgu Mureş using the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (SES), and the short-form Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (ABSs).
Results revealed that institutional factors, particularly high school type, emerged as the strongest predictors of academic performance. Among the psychological traits, aggressiveness/hostility, impulsive sensation seeking, and rationality significantly predicted academic performance. Notably, impulsive sensation seeking was positively linked to higher performance in female but not male students, while aggressiveness/hostility predicted better performance only among students with high self-efficacy.
These findings highlight the potential for tailored intervention programs that take into account gender and personality differences to improve academic outcomes.
本研究考察人格特质、理性/非理性信念和自我效能感在学业成绩中的预测作用,同时探究这些因素如何与性别、居住地和学校类型相互作用。
使用祖克曼 - 库尔曼人格问卷(ZKPQ)、一般自我效能量表(SES)和简式态度与信念量表(ABSs),从特尔古穆列什的乔治·埃米尔·帕拉德医科大学、药学院、科学与技术学院的453名学生中收集数据。
结果显示,制度因素,特别是高中类型,是学业成绩最强的预测因素。在心理特质方面,攻击性/敌意、冲动性寻求刺激和理性显著预测学业成绩。值得注意的是,冲动性寻求刺激与女生而非男生的较高成绩呈正相关,而攻击性/敌意仅在高自我效能感的学生中预测成绩更好。
这些发现凸显了考虑性别和人格差异的定制化干预项目改善学业成果的潜力。