Zhang Gui, Li Zuojie, Xu Cheng Xin
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital Shanghai University Traditional Chinese Medicine Taizhou City Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, The People's Hospital of Cangnan Zhejiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0330329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330329. eCollection 2025.
To explore the relationship between serum lipase levels and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, evaluating its usefulness in assessing efficacy, severity, and predicting outcomes in CKD.
This retrospective study analyzed 251 CKD patients treated at our hospital from January 2018 to December 2023, categorizing them into four groups based on 2022 Chinese and 2024 KDIGO guidelines. Clinical and biochemical data, including serum lipase, Scr, and BUN were collected. Additionally, a supplementary cohort of 50 CKD patients treated between January 2024 and March 2025 was included to support the findings.
Serum lipase levels increased with advancing CKD stages [G1-2: 40.50 (30.75,52.00), G3:47.00 (37.25,61.00), G4:100.00 (77.00,126.00), G5:155.50 (126.75,243.75), (P < 0.05), showing a positive correlation with Scr (r = 0.714, P < 0.001) and BUN ((r = 0.678, P < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age, Scr, BUN, and serum lipase were positively associated with CKD stages, whereas HDL-C exhibited negative correlations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified several associated factors of CKD stages, including Scr (OR=1.01; 95% CI 1.01-1.02; P < 0.001), BUN (OR=1.17; 95% CI 1.07-1.29; P < 0.001), age (OR=1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05; P = 0.019), and serum lipase (OR=1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, P < 0.001). Serum lipase's AUC for distinguishing CKD stages G1-2 vs. G3, G3 vs. G4, and G4 vs. G5 were 0.64 (0.55-0.73), 0.89 (0.83-0.94), and 0.84 (0.75-0.93), respectively, with validation cohort AUCs of 0.65 (0.45-0.85), 0.82 (0.62-1.00), and 0.86 (0.65-1.00).
Serum lipase emerges as a novel biomarker for CKD stages, exhibiting stage-dependent increases and independent prognostic significance. Regular testing could improve risk assessment and complement current markers like eGFR and proteinuria, enhancing CKD management.
探讨血清脂肪酶水平与慢性肾脏病(CKD)进展之间的关系,评估其在评估CKD疗效、严重程度及预测预后方面的作用。
这项回顾性研究分析了2018年1月至2023年12月在我院接受治疗的251例CKD患者,根据2022年中国及2024年KDIGO指南将他们分为四组。收集了临床和生化数据,包括血清脂肪酶、Scr和BUN。此外,纳入了2024年1月至2025年3月期间接受治疗的50例CKD患者作为补充队列以支持研究结果。
血清脂肪酶水平随CKD分期进展而升高[G1-2期:40.50(30.75,52.00),G3期:47.00(37.25,61.00),G4期:100.00(77.00,126.00),G5期:155.50(126.75,243.75),(P<0.05)],与Scr(r = 0.714,P<0.001)和BUN(r = 0.678,P<0.001)呈正相关。单因素逻辑回归分析表明,年龄、Scr、BUN和血清脂肪酶与CKD分期呈正相关,而HDL-C呈负相关。多因素逻辑回归分析确定了CKD分期的几个相关因素,包括Scr(OR = 1.01;95%CI 1.01 - 1.02;P<0.001)、BUN(OR = 1.17;95%CI 1.07 - 1.29;P<0.001)、年龄(OR = 1.03;95%CI 1.01 - 1.05;P = 0.019)和血清脂肪酶(OR = 1.02,95%CI 1.01 - 1.03,P<0.001)。血清脂肪酶区分CKD G1-2期与G3期、G3期与G4期、G4期与G5期的AUC分别为0.64(0.55 - 0.73)、0.89(0.83 - 0.94)和0.84(0.75 - 0.93),验证队列的AUC分别为0.65(0.45 - 0.85)、0.82(0.62 - 1.00)和0.86(0.65 - 1.00)。
血清脂肪酶成为CKD分期的一种新型生物标志物,呈现出分期依赖性升高且具有独立的预后意义。定期检测可改善风险评估,并补充如eGFR和蛋白尿等现有标志物,加强CKD管理。