Suppr超能文献

与卡博替尼/凡德他尼相比,患者报告的塞尔帕替尼耐受性:LIBRETTO-531 -突变型甲状腺髓样癌随机对照试验的二次分析

Patient-Reported Tolerability of Selpercatinib Compared to Cabozantinib/Vandetanib: A Secondary Analysis of the LIBRETTO-531 Randomized-Controlled Trial in -Mutant Medullary Thyroid Cancer.

作者信息

Elisei Rossella, Wirth Lori J, Capdevila Jaume, Hoff Ana Oliveira, Tahara Makoto, Sherman Eric J, Hu Mimi I, Ge Ming-Hua, Wadsley Jonathan, Vaisman Fernanda, Kopeckova Katerina, Krajewska Jolanta, Olvera Dinorath, Churchill Collin, Maeda Patricia, Gilligan Adrienne M, Lin Yan, Payakachat Nalin, Robinson Bruce, Hadoux Julien, Brose Marcia S

机构信息

Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1177/10507256251367352.

Abstract

Progression-free survival (PFS) may not fully capture the impact of treatment on patients, especially in cancers with longer natural histories and thus, could be complemented by robust measures of patient-reported tolerability (PRT). We report the use of a novel, quantifiable PRT metric as a multiplicity-controlled endpoint to support regulatory and clinical decision-making for selpercatinib use. Comparative PRT was assessed in LIBRETTO-531 (NCT04211337), a randomized phase 3 trial of selpercatinib versus vandetanib/cabozantinib (control) in advanced -mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Patients were self-administered the single Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy item GP5: "I am bothered by side effects" weekly, and scores were dichotomized into "low" (0-2) and "high" (3-4) side-effect burden. PRT measured the proportion of time on treatment (PTT) with "high" side-effect burden for each patient. Comparative PRT was tested at a two-sided significance level of 0.05, conditional on achieving significance for efficacy endpoints. Complementary patient-reported outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptomatic adverse events self-administered at baseline and at different intervals post-baseline during treatment period. In the tolerability evaluable population (N = 242; selpercatinib n = 161 and control n = 81 [56 received cabozantinib, 25 received vandetanib]), patients on selpercatinib had significantly better PRT with lower PTT with "high side-effect burden" than control (8% vs. 24%, < 0.0001). Post-baseline compliance rates for PRO questionnaires were generally greater than 80% in both treatment groups. Patients on selpercatinib reported significantly less PTT with HRQoL impairment across physical (36% vs. 52%), role (2% vs. 11%), cognitive (4% vs. 8%), emotional (6% vs. 11%), and social (2% vs. 8%) function (all < 0.01); and significantly less PTT with severe diarrhea (5% vs. 38%), fatigue (6% vs. 21%), taste change (3% vs. 15%), decreased appetite (2% vs. 15%), and hand-foot syndrome (2% vs. 9%) (all < 0.001). This study demonstrated superior PRT for selpercatinib compared with control in patients with -mutant MTC, further supporting selpercatinib use as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced -mutant MTC. Comparative PRT deserves further adoption as a complement to traditional endpoints in future randomized-controlled trials.

摘要

无进展生存期(PFS)可能无法完全体现治疗对患者的影响,尤其是在自然病程较长的癌症中,因此,可通过患者报告的耐受性(PRT)的有力指标加以补充。我们报告了使用一种新颖的、可量化的PRT指标作为多重性控制终点,以支持塞普替尼使用的监管和临床决策。在LIBRETTO-531(NCT04211337)中评估了比较性PRT,这是一项塞普替尼与凡德他尼/卡博替尼(对照)用于晚期RET突变型甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)的随机3期试验。患者每周自行填写癌症治疗功能评估单项GP5:“我受到副作用的困扰”,分数被分为“低”(0-2)和“高”(3-4)副作用负担。PRT测量了每位患者治疗期间“高”副作用负担的时间比例(PTT)。在疗效终点达到显著性的条件下,以双侧显著性水平0.05检验比较性PRT。补充的患者报告结局包括健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)以及在基线和治疗期间基线后不同时间间隔自行报告的症状性不良事件。在耐受性可评估人群(N = 242;塞普替尼组n = 161,对照组n = 81 [56例接受卡博替尼,25例接受凡德他尼])中,接受塞普替尼治疗的患者的PRT显著更好,“高副作用负担”的PTT更低,优于对照组(8% 对24%,P < 0.0001)。两个治疗组中PRO问卷的基线后依从率总体上均大于80%。接受塞普替尼治疗的患者报告,在身体(36% 对52%)、角色(2% 对11%)、认知(4% 对8%)、情感(6% 对11%)和社会(2% 对8%)功能方面,HRQoL受损的PTT显著更低(均P < 0.01);在严重腹泻(5% 对38%)、疲劳(6% 对21%)、味觉改变(3% 对15%)、食欲减退(2% 对15%)和手足综合征(2% 对9%)方面,PTT也显著更低(均P < 0.001)。本研究表明,与对照组相比,塞普替尼在RET突变型MTC患者中的PRT更优,进一步支持将塞普替尼用作晚期RET突变型MTC患者的一线治疗。比较性PRT值得在未来的随机对照试验中进一步采用,作为传统终点的补充。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验