Rodriguez Stephanie, Shi Richard, Sundaram Saranya S, Mukherjee Rupak, Wooster Mathew, Veeraswamy Ravikumar, Tanious Adam
Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
J Surg Educ. 2025 Oct;82(10):103643. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103643. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
Vascular surgery (VS) program directors consider letters of recommendation (LOR) to be among the most essential parts of the residency application. This study aims to characterize applicant and LOR factors associated with an interview offer to a VS integrated residency (VSIR) program over three consecutive application cycles.
Applicant characteristics (all applicants; n = 388) and LORs were abstracted from residency applications to a VSIR program from 2021 to 2024. Applicant demographic data and letter writer characteristics were abstracted. The Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC-22) software, a validated text analysis program, was used to characterize LOR body content. Analyzed letters were compared according to interview offer and application year using multivariable analysis, examining the association between interview offer and applicant, letter writer, and LOR linguistic characteristics.
Applicants offered an interview (n = 129; 33% of all applicants) were more likely to hold alpha omega alpha membership, obtain honors on a surgery rotation, and have a higher Step 2 score. A higher proportion of LORs written by VS was associated with interview offer (89.5% vs 66.3%, p < 0.001), while fewer letters from general surgeons was associated with an interview offer in all years. The presence of at least one chair, chief, program directors, or away rotation letter was associated with an interview offer. Presence of an away letter increased each year, with 66% of applicants having an away letter in 2023 compared to 42% in 2021 (p < 0.001). Letters written for applicants offered an interview were 18% more likely to reference teaching (p < 0.001), 14.7% more likely to reference research (p = 0.004), and 7.3% more likely to reference curiosity (p = 0.03) with no variations by applicant year. Letters for interviewed applicants were less likely to reference ability (p = 0.02) and grindstone (p = 0.006).
Applicants offered a VSIR interview were more likely to demonstrate academic excellence and have letters written by VS and away institution faculty; these associations have strengthened in the absence of United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 scores after 2021. Linguistic characteristics of LORs remain relatively unchanged across application cycles, with an emphasis on teaching and research remaining associated with an interview offer.
血管外科(VS)项目主任认为推荐信(LOR)是住院医师申请中最重要的部分之一。本研究旨在描述在连续三个申请周期中,与血管外科综合住院医师(VSIR)项目面试邀请相关的申请人及推荐信因素。
从2021年至2024年VSIR项目的住院医师申请中提取申请人特征(所有申请人;n = 388)和推荐信。提取申请人的人口统计学数据和推荐人特征。使用经过验证的文本分析程序语言查询与字数统计(LIWC - 22)软件来描述推荐信的正文内容。使用多变量分析,根据面试邀请和申请年份对分析的推荐信进行比较,研究面试邀请与申请人、推荐人以及推荐信语言特征之间的关联。
获得面试邀请的申请人(n = 129;占所有申请人的33%)更有可能是αΩα成员,在外科轮转中获得荣誉,并且第二步考试成绩更高。由血管外科医生撰写的推荐信比例较高与面试邀请相关(89.5%对66.3%,p < 0.001),而普通外科医生撰写的推荐信较少与各年份的面试邀请相关。至少有一封来自科室主任、主任医师、项目主任或外院轮转的推荐信与面试邀请相关。外院推荐信的比例逐年增加,2023年有66%的申请人有外院推荐信,而2021年为42%(p < 0.001)。为获得面试邀请的申请人撰写的推荐信提及教学的可能性高18%(p < 0.001),提及研究的可能性高14.7%(p = 0.004),提及好奇心的可能性高7.3%(p = 0.03),且各申请年份无差异。给获得面试的申请人的推荐信提及能力(p = 0.02)和刻苦努力(p = 0.006)的可能性较小。
获得VSIR面试邀请的申请人更有可能表现出学术卓越,并且有血管外科医生和外院教员撰写的推荐信;在2021年后没有美国医学执照考试第一步成绩的情况下,这些关联有所加强。推荐信的语言特征在各申请周期中相对保持不变,强调教学和研究仍与面试邀请相关。