• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[18F]F-FAPI PET/CT在预测狼疮性肾炎的治疗反应方面优于[18F]F-FDG PET/CT。

[18F]F-FAPI PET/CT outperforms [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in predicting treatment response in lupus nephritis.

作者信息

Zhao Min, Zhou Chunqing, Fang Hao, Cao Yan, Hacker Marcus, Li Xiang, Guo Muyao, Yi Xiaoping, Zhang Xiaoli

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07523-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00259-025-07523-5
PMID:40830669
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify predictors of complete response (CR) following induction therapy in lupus nephritis (LN) and comparatively evaluate the predictive value of baseline [18 F]F-FAPI PET/CT versus [18 F]F-FDG PET/CT for treatment short-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty biopsy-proven LN patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent dual-tracer PET/CT imaging, using both [18 F]F-FAPI and [18 F]F-FDG imaging prior to standardized induction therapy. Treatment response was assessed at 6 months, categorizing into CR, partial response (PR), and non-response (NR) groups. Associations between PET metrics, clinical biomarkers and treatment response were analyzed. Semiquantitative PET parameters including renal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Baseline renal FAPI SUVmax was inversely correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and positively with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (P < 0.05 for both), whereas FDG SUVmax showed no significant correlation with either parameter. At 6 months, 50% of patients achieved CR, 25% PR, and 25% NR. Patients with CR exhibited significantly lower baseline renal FAPI SUVmax and TBR compared to those with non-CR (PR + NR) (P < 0.01). Visual assessment of FAPI uptake outperformed FDG in predicting CR, with higher accuracy (85% vs. 70%), specificity (90% vs. 50%), and positive predictive value (PPV, 89% vs. 64%), while sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were comparable. Univariate logistic regression identified age > 35 years (P < 0.05) and negative baseline FAPI uptake (P < 0.01) as significant predictors of CR. In multivariate analysis, negative FAPI uptake remained the only independent predictor (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

[18 F]F-FAPI PET/CT demonstrates superior predictive performance over [18 F]F-FDG PET/CT for short-term treatment response in lupus nephritis. It holds promise as a noninvasive imaging biomarker to guide clinical decision-making and optimize individualized therapy.

摘要

目的

确定狼疮性肾炎(LN)诱导治疗后完全缓解(CR)的预测因素,并比较评估基线[¹⁸F]F-FAPI PET/CT与[¹⁸F]F-FDG PET/CT对治疗短期结局的预测价值。

材料与方法

前瞻性纳入20例经活检证实的LN患者,在标准化诱导治疗前接受双示踪剂PET/CT成像,同时使用[¹⁸F]F-FAPI和[¹⁸F]F-FDG成像。在6个月时评估治疗反应,分为CR、部分缓解(PR)和无反应(NR)组。分析PET指标、临床生物标志物与治疗反应之间的关联。计算包括肾脏标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和靶本比(TBR)在内的半定量PET参数。

结果

基线肾脏FAPI SUVmax与估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)呈负相关,与红细胞沉降率(ESR)呈正相关(两者P均<0.05),而FDG SUVmax与这两个参数均无显著相关性。在6个月时,50%的患者达到CR,25%为PR,25%为NR。与非CR(PR+NR)患者相比,CR患者的基线肾脏FAPI SUVmax和TBR显著更低(P<0.01)。在预测CR方面,FAPI摄取的视觉评估优于FDG,具有更高的准确性(85%对70%)、特异性(90%对50%)和阳性预测值(PPV,分别为89%和64%),而敏感性和阴性预测值(NPV)相当。单因素逻辑回归确定年龄>35岁(P<0.05)和基线FAPI摄取阴性(P<0.01)是CR的显著预测因素。在多因素分析中,FAPI摄取阴性仍然是唯一的独立预测因素(P<0.01)。

结论

[¹⁸F]F-FAPI PET/CT在狼疮性肾炎短期治疗反应方面显示出优于[¹⁸F]F-FDG PET/CT的预测性能。它有望作为一种非侵入性成像生物标志物来指导临床决策并优化个体化治疗。

相似文献

1
[18F]F-FAPI PET/CT outperforms [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in predicting treatment response in lupus nephritis.[18F]F-FAPI PET/CT在预测狼疮性肾炎的治疗反应方面优于[18F]F-FDG PET/CT。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07523-5.
2
Diagnostic Value of [F]-FDG and [ Ga]-FAPI-04 PET/MRI for Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer.[F]-FDG和[Ga]-FAPI-04 PET/MRI对甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值
Mol Imaging Biol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-02028-x.
3
Relationship between PD-L1 expression and [F]FAPI versus [F]FDG uptake on PET/CT in lung cancer.肺癌患者PET/CT上PD-L1表达与[F]FAPI及[F]FDG摄取之间的关系
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07201-6.
4
PET/CT imaging fibroblast activation protein in initial colorectal cancer: compared to 18 F-FDG PET/CT.PET/CT 成像在原发性结直肠癌中检测成纤维细胞激活蛋白:与 18 F-FDG PET/CT 相比。
Nucl Med Commun. 2023 Nov 1;44(11):1011-1019. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001751. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
5
Comparison of Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation and Staging of Hepatobiliary Malignancies : A Single-center Prospective Study.18F-NOTA-FAPI-74与18F-FDG PET/CT在肝胆恶性肿瘤评估与分期中的比较:一项单中心前瞻性研究
Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Jul 1;50(7):612-622. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005889. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
6
Fibroblast Activation Protein and Glycolysis in Lymphoma Diagnosis: Comparison of Ga-FAPI PET/CT and F-FDG PET/CT.成纤维细胞激活蛋白与淋巴瘤诊断中的糖酵解:Ga-FAPI PET/CT 与 F-FDG PET/CT 的比较。
J Nucl Med. 2023 Sep;64(9):1399-1405. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265530. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
[F]-FAPI-04 PET/CT improves metastatic lesions detection for patients with uterine malignancy after radical surgery: prospectively compared with [F]-FDG PET/CT.[F]-FAPI-04 PET/CT改善了子宫恶性肿瘤根治术后患者转移灶的检测:与[F]-FDG PET/CT的前瞻性比较
Eur J Radiol. 2025 Sep;190:112270. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112270. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
8
Head-to-head comparison of [F]FAPI-42 and [F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.[F]FAPI-42与[F]FDG PET/CT在喉鳞状细胞癌评估中的头对头比较。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Mar 8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07180-8.
9
Dual-tracer PET/CT protocol with [F]FDG and [Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 outperforms single-tracer PET/CT with [F]FDG in different cancer types, resulting in larger functional and gross tumor volume.双示踪剂 PET/CT 方案([F]FDG 和 [Ga]Ga-FAPI-46)优于单示踪剂 PET/CT([F]FDG),在不同类型的癌症中,可获得更大的功能和大体肿瘤体积。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Jan;200(1):28-38. doi: 10.1007/s00066-023-02117-2. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
10
Usefulness of [F]FAPI-04 and [F]FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Comparative Study.[F]FAPI-04和[F]FDG PET/CT在检测腹膜癌转移中的应用:一项对比研究
Acad Radiol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.067.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple metabolic analysis of [F]FDG PET/CT in patients with kidney disease.肾病患者[F]FDG PET/CT的多重代谢分析
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 6;11(4):e42522. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42522. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
2
Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Imaging for Assessing Renal Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis in Lupus Nephritis.镓标记的FAPI-04 PET/CT成像用于评估狼疮性肾炎中的肾小管间质纤维化
J Nucl Med. 2025 Mar 3;66(3):418-424. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268643.
3
Lupus Nephritis Revealed by FAPI PET/CT.FAPI PET/CT显示的狼疮性肾炎
Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Mar 1;50(3):e171-e172. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005598. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
4
Predictive value of residual active histologic lesions on renal flare in lupus nephritis patients with clinical remission.残余活动性组织学病变对临床缓解的狼疮性肾炎患者肾脏复发的预测价值。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Nov 18;17(12):sfae350. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae350. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Predictive Factors for Renal Response in Lupus Nephritis: A Single-center Prospective Cohort Study.狼疮性肾炎肾脏反应的预测因素:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究
J Rheum Dis. 2022 Oct 1;29(4):223-231. doi: 10.4078/jrd.22.0006. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
[ Ga]Ga-FAPI uptake correlates with the state of chronic kidney disease.[^68]Ga-FAPI 摄取与慢性肾脏病的状态相关。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug;49(10):3365-3372. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05660-1. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Clinical translational evaluation of AlF-NOTA-FAPI for fibroblast activation protein-targeted tumour imaging.AlF-NOTA-FAPI 用于成纤维细胞激活蛋白靶向肿瘤成像的临床转化评估。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Dec;48(13):4259-4271. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05470-5. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
Measures of Adult Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Disease Activity and Damage.成人系统性红斑狼疮的评估:疾病活动与损伤
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Oct;72 Suppl 10:27-46. doi: 10.1002/acr.24221.
9
2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus.2019 年更新版的 EULAR 系统性红斑狼疮治疗建议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):736-745. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215089. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
10
Potential serum and urine biomarkers in patients with lupus nephritis and the unsolved problems.狼疮性肾炎患者潜在的血清和尿液生物标志物及未解决的问题。
Open Access Rheumatol. 2016 Sep 19;8:81-91. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S112829. eCollection 2016.