• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化背景调节社会影响的神经通路。

Cultural context moderates neural pathways to social influence.

作者信息

Cascio Christopher N, O'Donnell Matthew B, Simons-Morton Bruce G, Bingham C Raymond, Falk Emily B

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

出版信息

Cult Brain. 2017 Apr;5(1):50-70. doi: 10.1007/s40167-016-0046-3. Epub 2017 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s40167-016-0046-3
PMID:40831716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12360194/
Abstract

People from different cultural backgrounds respond differently to social cues, and may use their brains differently in social situations. Socioeconomic status (SES) is one key cultural variable that influences susceptibility to social cues, with those from lower SES backgrounds tending toward greater interdependence, and those from higher SES backgrounds tending toward greater independence. Building on past research linking brain sensitivity during social exclusion with tendency to take risks in the presence of peers, we examined whether SES moderated the relationship between neural measures of sensitivity during social exclusion and later conformity to peer pressure in a driving simulator. Our data show that SES does moderate the relationship between brain responses during social exclusion and conformity to peer influence on driving behavior. Specifically, increased activity in brain regions implicated in social pain and reward-sensitivity during social exclusion were associated with greater conformity to peer passenger driving norms for low SES and decreased conformity for high SES. In addition, increased activity brain regions implicated in understanding others' mental states during exclusion was associated with similar patterns of decreased conformity for high SES. Overall, results highlight the importance of considering cultural factors, such as SES, in understanding the relationship between neural processing of social cues and how these translate into real-world relevant behaviors.

摘要

来自不同文化背景的人对社交线索的反应不同,在社交场合中使用大脑的方式也可能不同。社会经济地位(SES)是影响对社交线索敏感度的一个关键文化变量,SES背景较低的人往往更倾向于相互依赖,而SES背景较高的人则更倾向于独立。基于以往将社会排斥期间的大脑敏感性与在同伴面前冒险倾向联系起来的研究,我们研究了SES是否调节了社会排斥期间敏感性的神经测量与后来在驾驶模拟器中对同伴压力的顺从之间的关系。我们的数据表明,SES确实调节了社会排斥期间的大脑反应与对驾驶行为中同伴影响的顺从之间的关系。具体而言,在社会排斥期间涉及社会痛苦和奖励敏感性的大脑区域活动增加,与低SES人群对同伴乘客驾驶规范的更高顺从性相关,而与高SES人群的顺从性降低相关。此外,在排斥期间涉及理解他人心理状态的大脑区域活动增加,与高SES人群类似的顺从性降低模式相关。总体而言,研究结果凸显了在理解社交线索的神经处理与这些如何转化为现实世界相关行为之间的关系时,考虑文化因素(如SES)的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/6c32171d36c0/nihms-1757766-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/698282b26eda/nihms-1757766-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/90e89c6e0e87/nihms-1757766-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/74bee45abd8a/nihms-1757766-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/4bce32a566f8/nihms-1757766-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/9aec1bf79ac3/nihms-1757766-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/83a77dd2223b/nihms-1757766-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/5cb352d83d3b/nihms-1757766-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/6c32171d36c0/nihms-1757766-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/698282b26eda/nihms-1757766-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/90e89c6e0e87/nihms-1757766-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/74bee45abd8a/nihms-1757766-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/4bce32a566f8/nihms-1757766-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/9aec1bf79ac3/nihms-1757766-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/83a77dd2223b/nihms-1757766-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/5cb352d83d3b/nihms-1757766-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/12360194/6c32171d36c0/nihms-1757766-f0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural context moderates neural pathways to social influence.文化背景调节社会影响的神经通路。
Cult Brain. 2017 Apr;5(1):50-70. doi: 10.1007/s40167-016-0046-3. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
5
Digitalization, Psychological Well-Being, and the Third-Level Digital Divide: Survey Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.数字化、心理健康与第三级数字鸿沟:中国新冠疫情期间的调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 18;27:e48195. doi: 10.2196/48195.
6
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.
7
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
An Examination of Perceived Stress and Emotion Regulation Challenges as Mediators of Associations Between Camouflaging and Internalizing Symptomatology.作为伪装与内化症状学之间关联的中介因素的感知压力和情绪调节挑战的考察
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):345-361. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0121. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer Passenger Norms and Pressure: Experimental Effects on Simulated Driving Among Teenage Males.同伴乘客规范与压力:对青少年男性模拟驾驶的实验影响。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2016 Aug;41(A):124-137. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
2
Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: A new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation.多巴胺能奖赏敏感性可促进青少年健康:腹侧纹状体激活机制的新视角。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Feb;17:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
3
Neural responses to exclusion predict susceptibility to social influence.
神经对排斥的反应预测了对社会影响的易感性。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5 Suppl):S22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.035.
4
Association among socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and all-cause mortality in the United States.在美国,社会经济地位、健康行为与全因死亡率之间的关联。
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):170-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000038.
5
Experimental effects of injunctive norms on simulated risky driving among teenage males.规范性禁令对青少年男性模拟危险驾驶行为的影响。
Health Psychol. 2014 Jul;33(7):616-27. doi: 10.1037/a0034837. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
6
Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and individual lung cancer risk: evaluating long-term exposure measures and mediating mechanisms.社区社会经济地位与个体肺癌风险:评价长期暴露测量指标与中介机制
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
7
Socioeconomic position and incidence of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社会经济地位与胃癌发病风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Oct;67(10):854-60. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201108. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
8
Socioeconomic status and substance use among young adults: a comparison across constructs and drugs.社会经济地位与青年群体的物质使用:不同概念和药物的比较。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Sep;73(5):772-82. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.772.
9
Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor.社会阶层、唯我论和语境主义:富人与穷人的不同之处。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):546-72. doi: 10.1037/a0028756.
10
An imaging genetics approach to understanding social influence.一种用于理解社会影响的影像遗传学方法。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 12;6:168. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00168. eCollection 2012.