Nayak Dweeti, Akers Katherine G, Frederickson Andrew M, Mbous Yves P V, Aguiar-Ibáñez Raquel
Precision AQ, New York, NY, United States.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 4;15:1615795. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1615795. eCollection 2025.
The development and regulatory approval of anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) agents, based on positive clinical trial results, has dramatically changed clinical practice and treatment paths in oncology. However, the effectiveness of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in real-world settings is not well understood. Therefore, it is important to summarize real-world evidence on the overall survival (OS) of patients with specific tumor types prior to and following the regulatory approval of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.
A systematic literature review including observational studies worldwide reporting the OS of patients receiving conventional first-line pharmacological therapy for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), or melanoma in the anti-PD-(L)1 pre-approval era and similar patients receiving first-line anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in the post-approval era was conducted. For each tumor type, studies were selected from a pre-approval era, defined as a period beginning 5 years before the first approval of an anti-PD-(L)1 agent and ending the year before its approval for first-line therapy, and a post-approval era, defined as a period beginning the year that an anti-PD-(L)1 agent was approved for first-line therapy and ending in 2023. Relevant studies were identified through MEDLINE and Embase searches. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Median OS (mOS) was summarized within each tumor type and descriptively compared across the pre- and post-approval eras.
A total of 86, 44, and 35 studies evaluating first-line treatments for advanced/metastatic NSCLC, RCC, and melanoma, respectively, were included. Post-approval mOS in patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy tended to be numerically longer than pre-approval mOS in patients treated with conventional therapy within certain patient and treatment categories. For example, pre-approval mOS ranged from 6.9 to 18.4 months (n=18 treatment groups), and post-approval mOS ranged from 10.6 to 46.2 months in NSCLC patients with PD-L1 tumor expression ≥50% who received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy (n=33; with mOS not reached for n=3). In RCC patients classified as high-risk, pre-approval mOS ranged from 2 to 10.3 months (n=7), and post-approval mOS ranged from 7.8 to 24.3 months (n=4). Also, in melanoma patients with any BRAF mutation, pre-approval mOS was 14.2 months (n=1), and post-approval mOS ranged from 15.9 to 51.2 months (n=6; with mOS not reached for n=3).
A survival benefit in real-world practice was observed for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, RCC, or melanoma receiving first-line anti-PD-(L)1 therapy after its regulatory approval when compared with patients treated with conventional care before anti-PD-(L)1 therapy approval. This supports the use of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy as a standard of care in many countries.
基于阳性临床试验结果,抗程序性死亡(配体)1(anti-PD-(L)1)药物的研发及监管批准极大地改变了肿瘤学的临床实践和治疗路径。然而,anti-PD-(L)1疗法在现实环境中的有效性尚不清楚。因此,总结anti-PD-(L)1疗法监管批准前后特定肿瘤类型患者总生存期(OS)的真实世界证据很重要。
进行了一项系统文献综述,纳入全球范围内报告抗PD-(L)1批准前时代接受晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)、肾细胞癌(RCC)或黑色素瘤一线常规药物治疗患者的OS,以及批准后时代接受一线anti-PD-(L)1疗法的类似患者的OS的观察性研究。对于每种肿瘤类型,研究选自批准前时代(定义为抗PD-(L)1药物首次批准前5年开始至其批准一线治疗前一年结束的时间段)和批准后时代(定义为抗PD-(L)1药物批准一线治疗当年开始至2023年结束的时间段)。通过MEDLINE和Embase检索识别相关研究。由两名独立评审员进行研究选择、数据提取和质量评估。在每种肿瘤类型中总结中位OS(mOS),并对批准前后时代进行描述性比较。
分别纳入了86项、44项和35项评估晚期/转移性NSCLC、RCC和黑色素瘤一线治疗的研究。在某些患者和治疗类别中,接受anti-PD-(L)1治疗的患者批准后的mOS在数值上往往比接受传统治疗的患者批准前的mOS更长。例如,在接受anti-PD-(L)1单药治疗的PD-L1肿瘤表达≥50%的NSCLC患者中,批准前mOS为6.9至18.4个月(n = 18个治疗组),批准后mOS为10.6至46.2个月(n = 33;3例未达到mOS)。在分类为高危的RCC患者中,批准前mOS为2至10.3个月(n = 7),批准后mOS为7.8至24.3个月(n = 4)。此外,在任何BRAF突变的黑色素瘤患者中,批准前mOS为14.2个月(n = 1),批准后mOS为15.9至51.2个月(n = 6;3例未达到mOS)。
与anti-PD-(L)1疗法批准前接受传统治疗的患者相比,在现实世界实践中观察到晚期/转移性NSCLC、RCC或黑色素瘤患者在接受一线anti-PD-(L)1疗法监管批准后有生存获益。这支持在许多国家将anti-PD-(L)1疗法用作标准治疗。