文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

纹理和颜色增强成像在结肠肿瘤诊断中的应用:一项系统评价与分析

Texture and Color Enhanced Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colonic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis.

作者信息

Judge Ciaran, Law David, Jones Glynis, Picardo Sherman, Ragunath Krish

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology Royal Perth Hospital Perth Australia.

South Metropolitan Health Service, Fiona Stanley Hospital Library and Information Service for East and South Metropolitan Health Services Murdoch Australia.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2025 Aug 17;9(8):e70191. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70191. eCollection 2025 Aug.


DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70191
PMID:40832005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12358731/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Image enhanced endoscopy (IEE) can augment the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursor lesions, potentially reducing incidence and mortality. Early data on texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) support its use for neoplasia screening. This study aimed to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis to assess the impact of TXI on colonic adenoma detection. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing TXI with white light imaging (WLI) were eligible for inclusion. Searches were conducted through relevant databases and major conferences up to July 1, 2024. The primary outcome was ADR, with secondary outcomes including polyp detection rate (PDR), mean number of adenomas per patient (MAP), and size, location, morphology, and withdrawal time. RESULTS: From 1270 results, 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis ( = 5481). TXI significantly increased ADR compared to WLI (55.8% vs. 47.8%, RR 1.24,  < 0.001), PDR (63.7% vs. 54.7%, RR 1.23,  < 0.001), and MAP (mean difference 0.41,  = 0.005). and improved detection of proximal lesions (MD 0.21, 95% CI [0.15-0.27],  < 0.001,  = 0%). Pooled withdrawal times were not different between groups, with no differences between endoscopist experience or quality of bowel preparation, where reported. Sub-analysis further demonstrated superiority of TXI, with an absolute difference in ADR of 14.2%. CONCLUSION: TXI significantly improves ADR, PDR, and MAP compared to WLI, highlighting its potential to enhance CRC screening efficacy without impact from user experience, bowel prep, or withdrawal times. TXI is a useful and practical adjunct to enhance the detection of colonic neoplasia.

摘要

引言:图像增强内镜检查(IEE)可提高结直肠癌(CRC)及其前驱病变的检出率,有可能降低发病率和死亡率。关于纹理和颜色增强成像(TXI)的早期数据支持其用于肿瘤筛查。本研究旨在系统评价并进行荟萃分析,以评估TXI对结肠腺瘤检测的影响。 方法:系统评价和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南。比较TXI与白光成像(WLI)的研究符合纳入标准。通过相关数据库和主要会议进行检索,截至2024年7月1日。主要结局为腺瘤检出率(ADR),次要结局包括息肉检出率(PDR)、每名患者腺瘤的平均数量(MAP)以及大小、位置、形态和退镜时间。 结果:从1270项结果中,4项研究纳入荟萃分析(n = 5481)。与WLI相比,TXI显著提高了ADR(55.8%对47.8%,RR 1.24,P < 0.001)、PDR(63.7%对54.7%,RR 1.23,P < 0.001)和MAP(平均差异0.41,P = 0.005),并改善了近端病变的检测(MD 0.21,95%CI[0.15 - 0.27],P < 0.001,I² = 0%)。各研究组的汇总退镜时间无差异,在内镜医师经验或肠道准备质量方面(如报告所述)也无差异。亚组分析进一步证明了TXI的优越性,ADR的绝对差异为14.2%。 结论:与WLI相比,TXI显著提高了ADR、PDR和MAP,突出了其在不受到用户经验、肠道准备或退镜时间影响的情况下提高CRC筛查效果的潜力。TXI是增强结肠肿瘤检测的一种有用且实用的辅助手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/ea3e41015ca1/JGH3-9-e70191-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/382b489adc7b/JGH3-9-e70191-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/469caebedcaf/JGH3-9-e70191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/98c8cbcfb780/JGH3-9-e70191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/9852e4e5f9b9/JGH3-9-e70191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/a1d2850870e4/JGH3-9-e70191-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/de5a46d40566/JGH3-9-e70191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/6c79881e1fbe/JGH3-9-e70191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/ea3e41015ca1/JGH3-9-e70191-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/382b489adc7b/JGH3-9-e70191-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/469caebedcaf/JGH3-9-e70191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/98c8cbcfb780/JGH3-9-e70191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/9852e4e5f9b9/JGH3-9-e70191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/a1d2850870e4/JGH3-9-e70191-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/de5a46d40566/JGH3-9-e70191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/6c79881e1fbe/JGH3-9-e70191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d859/12358731/ea3e41015ca1/JGH3-9-e70191-g007.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Texture and Color Enhanced Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colonic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis.

JGH Open. 2025-8-17

[2]
The Efficacy of Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Observation in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (deTXIon Study).

Gastroenterology. 2025-8

[3]
Linked color imaging versus conventional white-light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-8-19

[4]
Efficacy of Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging for Identification of Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Crossover Randomized Trial.

Dig Endosc. 2025-8-24

[5]
An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon Using a Novel Endoscopic System with Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Decreases Polyp Miss Rates: A Multicenter Study.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-7-11

[6]
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Health Technol Assess. 2010-6

[7]
Impact of study design on adenoma detection in the evaluation of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2024-5

[8]
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-17

[9]
Screening for prostate cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-1-31

[10]
Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Colorectal adenoma detection rate using texture and color enhancement imaging versus white light imaging with chromoendoscopy: a propensity score matching study.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-10

[2]
Comparison of adenoma miss rate and adenoma detection rate between conventional colonoscopy and colonoscopy with second-generation distal attachment cuff: a multicenter, randomized, back-to-back trial.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2024-5

[3]
Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Improves Colonic Adenoma Detection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gastroenterology. 2024-2

[4]
Interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program.

Endoscopy. 2023-12

[5]
Texture and color enhancement imaging versus high definition white-light endoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized trial.

Endoscopy. 2023-12

[6]
Blue-light imaging or narrow-band imaging for proximal colonic lesions: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2023-11

[7]
Key quality indicators in colonoscopy.

Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023-3-10

[8]
Detection of colorectal adenomas with texture and color enhancement imaging: Multicenter observational study.

Dig Endosc. 2023-5

[9]
Linked-Color Imaging Detects More Colorectal Adenoma and Serrated Lesions: An International Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023-6

[10]
Reduced Adenoma Miss Rate With 9-Minute vs 6-Minute Withdrawal Times for Screening Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Tandem Trial.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2023-5-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索