Baillet Emmanuelle, Harp Nicholas R, Kober Hedy, Roos Corey
University of California, Berkeley.
Yale University.
medRxiv. 2025 Aug 12:2025.08.08.25333320. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.08.25333320.
Craving, the desire to use substances, is a key factor and diagnostic criterion for substance use disorders (SUDs) that predicts substance use. Experiencing affective states, both positive (PA) and negative (NA), are also implicated in SUDs. Yet, the interrelationships among affect, craving, and substance use remain unclear, particularly at the within-person level of analysis. This study aimed to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to test whether craving mediates the association between PA/NA and subsequent substance use.
Observational study using EMA over a 14-day period and multilevel mediation models with bootstrapping.
Outpatient addiction treatment centers in which participants were enrolled during the data collection period.
Adults with SUDs enrolled in a pilot randomized controlled trial, evaluating an app-delivered mindfulness-based intervention for SUDs, that completed the baseline EMA period and were also randomized to a treatment condition (N=36).
Participants completed EMA surveys three times daily [midday, afternoon, evening] for 14 days, reporting on current PA, NA, craving, and substance use. We used multilevel mediation modeling to test within-person associations and examine whether craving mediated the link between affect (PA and NA) and subsequent substance use.
Mediation analysis showed an indirect pathway via craving on the link between affect and substance use. Higher PA was associated with lower craving at the same EMA survey, which in turn led to reduced likelihood of substance use at the next survey (β=-0.04, p=0.02). Conversely, higher NA was associated with higher craving at the same survey, leading to greater likelihood of substance use at the next survey (β=0.08, p=0.03).
At the within-person level, craving mediates the association between affective states and subsequent substance use in individuals with SUD. PA predicted craving, which in turn predicted likelihood of substance use, while NA predicted craving, which in turn predicted likelihood of substance use. Our findings suggest that a promising strategy may be targeting momentary affect in daily life, such as through ecological momentary interventions.
渴望,即使用物质的欲望,是物质使用障碍(SUDs)的一个关键因素和诊断标准,它可预测物质使用情况。体验积极(PA)和消极(NA)情感状态也与物质使用障碍有关。然而,情感、渴望和物质使用之间的相互关系仍不清楚,尤其是在个体层面的分析中。本研究旨在使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)来测试渴望是否介导了积极/消极情感与随后物质使用之间的关联。
一项在14天内使用EMA的观察性研究,并采用带有自抽样法的多层次中介模型。
在数据收集期间参与者登记入组的门诊成瘾治疗中心。
参加一项试点随机对照试验的患有物质使用障碍的成年人,该试验评估一种通过应用程序提供的基于正念的物质使用障碍干预措施,这些参与者完成了基线EMA阶段,并且也被随机分配到一种治疗条件下(N = 36)。
参与者连续14天每天进行三次EMA调查[中午、下午、晚上],报告当前的积极情感、消极情感、渴望和物质使用情况。我们使用多层次中介模型来测试个体内部的关联,并检查渴望是否介导了情感(积极情感和消极情感)与随后物质使用之间的联系。
中介分析显示了情感与物质使用之间通过渴望的间接路径。在同一EMA调查中,较高的积极情感与较低的渴望相关,这反过来又导致在下一次调查中物质使用的可能性降低(β = -0.04,p = 0.02)。相反,在同一调查中,较高的消极情感与较高的渴望相关,导致在下一次调查中物质使用的可能性更大(β = 0.08,p = 0.03)。
在个体层面,渴望介导了物质使用障碍患者情感状态与随后物质使用之间的关联。积极情感预测渴望,而渴望反过来又预测物质使用的可能性,消极情感预测渴望,渴望反过来又预测物质使用的可能性。我们的研究结果表明,一个有前景的策略可能是针对日常生活中的瞬时情感,例如通过生态瞬时干预。