Miyake Makoto, Doi Hiraku, Noguchi Yu, Uehara Kyokun, Tamura Toshihiro
Department of Cardiology, Tenri Hospital, 200, Mishima-cho, Tenri, Nara 632-8552, Japan.
Congenital Heart Disease Center, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Japan.
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 Jul 21;3(3):qyaf089. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf089. eCollection 2025 Aug.
In adult Fontan patients, a higher central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Assessing CVP is helpful to guide therapeutic strategies; however, it remains unclear whether CVP can be accurately estimated from the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter by echocardiography.
This single-centre, retrospective study enrolled 21 adult Fontan patients (median age: 21.5 years, 52% male) who had a transthoracic echocardiogram performed after admission for a scheduled cardiac catheterization. The relationship between CVP estimated by echocardiography and CVP measured by catheterization was investigated. According to echocardiographic guidelines, CVP was estimated to be 3, 8, or 15 mmHg on the basis of the IVC diameter and its respiratory collapse. To evaluate the agreement between estimated and measured CVP grades, measured CVP was also classified into three grades. The mean IVC diameter and measured CVP were 1.41 ± 0.27 cm and 11.9 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively. Both the IVC diameter and the estimated CVP grade were correlated with measured CVP ( = 0.526, = 0.014 and rho = 0.573, = 0.007, respectively). However, the estimated CVP grade was concordant with the measured CVP grade in only two patients. In the remaining 19 patients (90%), the estimated CVP grade was lower than the measured CVP grade. Only slight agreement was observed between these two gradings of CVP [weighted kappa coefficient: 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00-0.25].
In adult Fontan patients, the echocardiographic classification of CVP grading using the IVC diameter may underestimate CVP, suggesting that this echocardiographic method cannot replace invasive methods in accurately assessing CVP.
在成年Fontan患者中,较高的中心静脉压(CVP)与较差的临床结局相关。评估CVP有助于指导治疗策略;然而,目前尚不清楚通过超声心动图测量下腔静脉(IVC)直径能否准确估算CVP。
本单中心回顾性研究纳入了21例成年Fontan患者(中位年龄:21.5岁,52%为男性),这些患者因计划进行的心导管检查入院后接受了经胸超声心动图检查。研究了通过超声心动图估算的CVP与通过导管测量的CVP之间的关系。根据超声心动图指南,根据IVC直径及其呼吸塌陷情况,将CVP估算为3、8或15 mmHg。为了评估估算的CVP分级与测量的CVP分级之间的一致性,测量的CVP也分为三个等级。IVC平均直径和测量的CVP分别为1.41±0.27 cm和11.9±2.8 mmHg。IVC直径和估算的CVP分级均与测量的CVP相关(分别为r = 0.526,P = 0.014和rho = 0.573,P = 0.007)。然而,只有2例患者估算的CVP分级与测量的CVP分级一致。在其余19例患者(90%)中,估算的CVP分级低于测量的CVP分级。这两种CVP分级之间仅观察到轻微的一致性[加权kappa系数:0.13,95%置信区间(CI):0.00 - 0.25]。
在成年Fontan患者中,使用IVC直径对CVP进行超声心动图分级可能会低估CVP,这表明这种超声心动图方法在准确评估CVP方面无法替代侵入性方法。