Shankar S, Shyamprakash J, Ravishankar K S, Rahamathulla M Mohamed Ilyas
Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Aug 15:02537176251364096. doi: 10.1177/02537176251364096.
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) features impulsivity, emotional dysregulation, and self-injurious behaviors (SIB). Cognitive deficits, such as executive dysfunction (ED) and working memory (WM) impairments, may drive these symptoms, yet their roles remain underexplored. This study examined relationships among ED, WM, impulsivity, and SIB in BPD to identify cognitive predictors of these behaviors.
This cross-sectional study assessed 30 individuals with BPD per DSM-5 criteria. Participants completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) for impulsivity, Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI) for SIB, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) for ED, and Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS) task for WM. Spearman's correlations and regression analyses evaluated associations between cognitive deficits, impulsivity, and SIB.
Elevated impulsivity was linked to more WCST perseverative errors (ρ = 0.45, = .02) and lower LNS scores (ρ = -0.38, = .04). SIB correlated with ED (ρ = 0.41, = .03) but not WM (ρ = -0.20, > .05). High-impulsivity participants had greater WCST errors (median = 20 vs. 11, H = 8.12, < .05) and lower LNS scores (median = 6 vs. 10, H = 7.33, < .05) than low-impulsivity peers. Regression confirmed BIS-11 scores predicted WCST errors ( = 0.40, < .01) and LNS performance ( = -0.35, < .05).
The ED and WM impairments were linked to impulsivity, with ED also tied to SIB. Cognitive remediation may reduce these behaviors. Lacking a control group, longitudinal research is needed.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的特征包括冲动性、情绪调节障碍和自我伤害行为(SIB)。认知缺陷,如执行功能障碍(ED)和工作记忆(WM)受损,可能导致这些症状,但其作用仍未得到充分研究。本研究调查了BPD患者中ED、WM、冲动性和SIB之间的关系,以确定这些行为的认知预测因素。
这项横断面研究根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)标准评估了30名BPD患者。参与者完成了用于评估冲动性的巴雷特冲动性量表(BIS-11)、用于评估SIB的故意自我伤害量表(DSHI)、用于评估ED的威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)以及用于评估WM的字母数字排序(LNS)任务。采用斯皮尔曼相关性分析和回归分析来评估认知缺陷、冲动性和SIB之间的关联。
冲动性增加与WCST中更多的持续性错误相关(ρ = 0.45,P = 0.02)以及较低的LNS分数相关(ρ = -0.38,P = 0.04)。SIB与ED相关(ρ = 0.41,P = 0.03),但与WM无关(ρ = -0.20,P > 0.05)。高冲动性参与者比低冲动性参与者有更多的WCST错误(中位数 = 20对11,H = 8.12,P < 0.05)和更低的LNS分数(中位数 = 6对10,H = 7.33,P < 0.05)。回归分析证实BIS-11分数可预测WCST错误(β = 0.40,P < 0.01)和LNS表现(β = -0.35,P < 0.05)。
ED和WM受损与冲动性相关,ED也与SIB相关。认知康复可能会减少这些行为。由于缺乏对照组,需要进行纵向研究。