Winters J J, Hoats D L
Am J Ment Defic. 1985 Nov;90(3):335-41.
In Phase I of this study, mentally retarded adults judged whether exemplars were members of their respective categories. In Phase II they judged how representative the exemplars were of their categories. Comparisons were made between this group and the nonretarded groups of Bjorklund, Thompson, and Ornstein (1983) and Uyeda and Mandler (1980). There was little evidence of a developmental relationship between typicality ratings given by retarded and nonretarded persons, but there were significant relationships among the groups for specific categories. Relationships were more category-than mental age-dependent. Other analyses indicated that Rosch's (1975) finding that typical exemplars are incorporated into category structures prior to atypical exemplars was replicated with retarded persons.
在本研究的第一阶段,成年智障者判断范例是否属于各自的类别。在第二阶段,他们判断范例对其类别具有多大的代表性。将该组与比约克隆德、汤普森和奥恩斯坦(1983年)以及上田和曼德勒(1980年)的非智障组进行了比较。几乎没有证据表明智障者和非智障者给出的典型性评分之间存在发展关系,但各群体在特定类别上存在显著关系。关系更多地取决于类别而非心理年龄。其他分析表明,罗施(1975年)的发现,即典型范例先于非典型范例被纳入类别结构,在智障者中得到了重复验证。