Wagg Adrian, Agholme Fredrik, Schwiegel Hardy, Huige Nicole, Hayder-Beichel Daniela
Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Alberta, 1-198 Clinical Sciences Building 11350 - 83 Avenue 1-198 CSB 11350-83 Ave, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada.
Global Clinical Affairs, Essity Hygiene and Health AB, Gothenburg, Västra Götaland County, Sweden.
Age Ageing. 2025 Aug 1;54(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf236.
Urinary Incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent in older residents of nursing homes. For many, management consists of using appropriate products (pads) maintained by a check and change regimen; this is often poorly managed. Digital health technology devices, like urine saturation sensors, may aid ensure timely change of pads. This study examined the efficacy and safety of the use of the TENA SmartCare Change Indicator (Change Indicator) device for nursing home residents with UI.
Cluster randomised controlled trial of device use in older nursing home residents with UI, compared to usual care. Co-primary outcomes were a compound care efficiency score and change in skin health. Secondary resident and caregiver outcomes were also compared.
Fourteen sites were recruited, nine of which operated routine check and change regimens. Included units comprised 108 residents, 53 in the intervention group and 49 in the usual care group and 83 caregivers (31 usual care, 52 intervention). The median age of residents was 87 (range 59-101) years; 21.5% were male. Care efficiency was improved by 30 min/day in the intervention group and 16 min/day in the usual care group (P > .05). There was no change in skin health. There were statistically significant improvements in sleep quality and a total of 24 hour absorbency of pads used, favouring device use. One device related harm was reported.
This comparative trial of a device designed to improve the delivery of continence care to older residents of nursing homes resulted in reductions in time spent in continence care by 30 min/day, or a 31% reduction. Given that the study failed to demonstrate its primary outcome, it is difficult to assess the clinical relevance of device use. The reduction in pad use and in number of sleep interruptions are valuable outcomes. A longer-term implementation and efficacy study is warranted.
尿失禁(UI)在养老院老年居民中非常普遍。对于许多人来说,管理措施包括使用通过检查和更换方案维护的合适产品(尿垫);但这一管理往往不佳。数字健康技术设备,如尿液饱和度传感器,可能有助于确保尿垫的及时更换。本研究考察了TENA SmartCare更换指示器(更换指示器)设备用于养老院尿失禁居民的有效性和安全性。
对养老院老年尿失禁居民使用该设备进行整群随机对照试验,并与常规护理进行比较。共同主要结局是综合护理效率评分和皮肤健康变化。还比较了次要的居民和护理人员结局。
招募了14个地点,其中9个实施常规检查和更换方案。纳入的单元包括108名居民,干预组53名,常规护理组49名,以及83名护理人员(常规护理组31名,干预组52名)。居民的中位年龄为87岁(范围59 - 101岁);21.5%为男性。干预组的护理效率每天提高30分钟,常规护理组每天提高16分钟(P > 0.05)。皮肤健康没有变化。睡眠质量和所用尿垫的24小时总吸收量有统计学显著改善,支持使用该设备。报告了1例与设备相关的伤害。
这项旨在改善养老院老年居民失禁护理的设备比较试验使失禁护理时间每天减少30分钟,即减少31%。鉴于该研究未能证明其主要结局,难以评估设备使用的临床相关性。尿垫使用减少和睡眠中断次数减少是有价值的结局。有必要进行长期实施和疗效研究。