Jiang Yihua, Zeng Yuqian, Wang Qin, Hu Junjiao, Li Wei, Yang Tao, Deng Kai, Zhou Zhou, Farah Changaiz, Peng Anquan, Zhang Zhiwen
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Ear Institute of Central South University, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09615-2.
To explore the long-term vestibular and audiometric results of the patients with Meniere's disease (MD) who underwent endolymphatic duct blockage (EDB), endolymphatic sac drainage (EDD) and endolymphatic sac decompression (ESD).
A total of 51 MD patients receiving EDB (n = 24), EDD (n = 15) and ESD (n = 12) were enrolled for evaluation of their vertigo control, hearing threshold, caloric test, and video head impulse test (vHIT) results with 4-year follow-up.
The recurrence rate of vertigo attacks ratio was significantly higher in ESD compared to the EDB (P = 0.012) and EDD (P = 0.037) groups. Both EDB and EDD showed a significantly lower vertigo recurrence rate (VRR) than ESD (P = 0.040 and P = 0.047, respectively) from 0 to 24 months; yet EDB showed a significantly lower VRR than EDD (P = 0.044) and ESD (P = 0.010) in 25 to 48 months postoperatively. Compared with preoperative measurements, the postoperative average hearing thresholds and mean caloric canal paresis value tended to decrease in EDB but increase in ESD with no statistically significant difference, while hearing and caloric canal paresis value increased significantly in EDD (p = 0.001). A comparison of preoperative and postoperative prevalence of abnormal vHIT test showed no significant differences in EDB and ESD, but a significant difference in EDD (p = 0.017).
Both EDB and EDD were more effective than ESD in controlling vertigo spells. In contrast to the relatively poor preservation of hearing and vestibular function in ESD, EDB could better preserve hearing and vestibular function, while in patients who underwent EDD, both hearing and vestibular impairments could be detected in long-term follow-up.
探讨接受内淋巴管阻塞(EDB)、内淋巴囊引流(EDD)和内淋巴囊减压(ESD)的梅尼埃病(MD)患者的长期前庭和听力结果。
共纳入51例接受EDB(n = 24)、EDD(n = 15)和ESD(n = 12)的MD患者,对其眩晕控制、听力阈值、冷热试验和视频头脉冲试验(vHIT)结果进行评估,并进行4年随访。
与EDB组(P = 0.012)和EDD组(P = 0.037)相比,ESD组眩晕发作复发率显著更高。在0至24个月期间,EDB和EDD的眩晕复发率(VRR)均显著低于ESD(分别为P = 0.040和P = 0.047);然而,在术后25至48个月,EDB的VRR显著低于EDD(P = 0.044)和ESD(P = 0.010)。与术前测量值相比,EDB术后平均听力阈值和平均冷热半规管轻瘫值趋于下降,而ESD则上升,差异无统计学意义,而EDD的听力和冷热半规管轻瘫值显著增加(p = 0.001)。术前和术后vHIT试验异常患病率的比较显示,EDB和ESD无显著差异,但EDD有显著差异(p = 0.017)。
EDB和EDD在控制眩晕发作方面均比ESD更有效。与ESD中听力和前庭功能保存相对较差相比,EDB能更好地保存听力和前庭功能,而接受EDD的患者在长期随访中可发现听力和前庭功能均受损。