• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国基层医疗卫生机构用药安全自我评估工具的开发与验证

Development and validation of a medication safety self-assessment tool for primary healthcare settings in China.

作者信息

Yong-Guang Shang, Wang-Jun Qin, Dong-Jie Guo, Peng-Mei Li, Lei Zhang

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 5;12:1584286. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1584286. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1584286
PMID:40837575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12361196/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication safety remains a global public health challenge, particularly in resource-constrained primary care settings. This study aimed to develop and validate a specific, proactive, medication safety self-assessment tool tailored for primary healthcare settings in China.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach combining literature review, field investigations, a Delphi expert consultation (3 rounds), and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was implemented. Forty-three voluntarily participating settings completed the self-assessment, with effectiveness validated through correlation analysis between assessment scores and adverse drug events (ADEs) indicators (medication errors, dispensing/prescribing errors).

RESULTS

We constructed a medication safety self-assessment tool for primary care settings comprising 5 domains, 18 core characteristics, and 84 self-assessment items. The mean percent score for 43 participating primary care settings was 81.5% ± 11.7%, and Spearman's rank correlations were used to examine the relationship between the overall assessment scores to the incidence of ADEs (Correlation Coefficient is -0.448,  = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

As the first medication safety assessment tool for Chinese primary healthcare settings, based on current medication practices and validated through ADE, implementation demonstrates potential to enhance medication safety practices.

摘要

背景

药物安全仍然是一项全球公共卫生挑战,尤其是在资源有限的基层医疗环境中。本研究旨在开发并验证一种专门为中国基层医疗环境量身定制的、主动的药物安全自我评估工具。

方法

采用了一种混合方法,结合文献综述、实地调查、三轮德尔菲专家咨询以及层次分析法(AHP)。43个自愿参与的机构完成了自我评估,并通过评估分数与药物不良事件(ADEs)指标(用药错误、调配/处方错误)之间的相关性分析来验证其有效性。

结果

我们构建了一个针对基层医疗环境的药物安全自我评估工具,该工具包括5个领域、18个核心特征和84个自我评估项目。43个参与的基层医疗机构的平均得分百分比为81.5%±11.7%,并使用斯皮尔曼等级相关性来检验总体评估分数与ADEs发生率之间的关系(相关系数为-0.448,P = 0.003)。

结论

作为首个针对中国基层医疗环境的药物安全评估工具,基于当前用药实践并通过ADE进行验证,实施该工具显示出增强用药安全实践的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/fbacd3c60c03/fmed-12-1584286-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/1a20aef0315b/fmed-12-1584286-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/e6559767ab0c/fmed-12-1584286-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/1febc09a588e/fmed-12-1584286-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/6b3c80e86967/fmed-12-1584286-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/fbacd3c60c03/fmed-12-1584286-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/1a20aef0315b/fmed-12-1584286-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/e6559767ab0c/fmed-12-1584286-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/1febc09a588e/fmed-12-1584286-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/6b3c80e86967/fmed-12-1584286-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/847e/12361196/fbacd3c60c03/fmed-12-1584286-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a medication safety self-assessment tool for primary healthcare settings in China.中国基层医疗卫生机构用药安全自我评估工具的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 5;12:1584286. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1584286. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A Delphi-based framework for optimizing nurse staffing in Chinese hospitals.一种基于德尔菲法的优化中国医院护士配置的框架。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 4;13:1510931. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510931. eCollection 2025.
4
Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.减少医院环境中成人的用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 25;11(11):CD009985. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009985.pub2.
5
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
6
Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care.基层医疗和二级医疗中急性和慢性疾病管理的非医学处方与医学处方对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):CD011227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011227.pub2.
7
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
10
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.改善基层医疗和社区环境中患有多种疾病患者预后的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 14;3(3):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Finding Consensus About the Level of Medication Safety in a Hospital Setting: Development and an Example of Application of a Modified Delphi Method.在医院环境中寻找药物安全水平的共识:改良 Delphi 法的制定及其应用实例。
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 14;9:630398. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.630398. eCollection 2021.
2
Effectiveness of a 'do not interrupt' vest intervention to reduce medication errors during medication administration: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial.“请勿打扰”背心干预措施在给药过程中减少用药错误的有效性:一项多中心整群随机对照试验
BMC Nurs. 2021 Aug 24;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00671-7.
3
Characterizing perceptions of an abbreviated ISMP Medication Safety Self Assessment for community pharmacies.
描述社区药店对简化版 ISMP 用药安全自我评估的认知。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Jul-Aug;61(4S):S105-S117. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
Rationing decisions and the endowment effect.配给决策与禀赋效应。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Mar;113(3):98-100. doi: 10.1177/0141076819893541.
5
Effect of Electronic Prescribing Strategies on Medication Error and Harm in Hospital: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.电子处方策略对医院用药错误和伤害的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2210-2223. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05236-8. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
6
Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: a systematic review.双重核对以减少给药错误的效果:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jul;29(7):595-603. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009552. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature.成人在社区护理环境中管理的药物错误、与错误相关的不良事件和错误风险因素的流行病学是什么?国际文献的系统回顾。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 5;8(5):e019101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019101.
8
Return to play criteria after hamstring muscle injury in professional football: a Delphi consensus study.职业足球运动员腘绳肌损伤后重返赛场的标准:德尔菲共识研究。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Aug;51(16):1221-1226. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097131. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review.德尔菲研究在姑息治疗中的实施和报告指南(CREDES):基于方法学系统评价的建议。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):684-706. doi: 10.1177/0269216317690685. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
10
Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure.胎儿生长受限的共识定义:德尔菲法
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):333-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.15884.