Rationing decisions and the endowment effect.
作者信息
Hubbeling Dieneke
机构信息
Wandsworth Home Treatment Team, South West London and St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust, Springfield Academic Hospital, London SW17 7DJ, UK.
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2020 Mar;113(3):98-100. doi: 10.1177/0141076819893541.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rationing decisions and the endowment effect.配给决策与禀赋效应。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Mar;113(3):98-100. doi: 10.1177/0141076819893541.
2
A policy agenda for health care rationing.医疗资源分配的政策议程。
Br Med Bull. 1995 Oct;51(4):885-99. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a073003.
3
Rationing health care in New Zealand. Explicit rationing needs more debate.新西兰的医疗保健配给。明确的配给需要更多讨论。
BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):708; author reply 708-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.708a.
4
Rationing health care: it's a matter of the health care system's structure.医疗保健配给：这关乎医疗保健系统的结构。
Ann Health Law. 2010 Spring;19(3):449-64, 1 p preceding i.
5
Rationing capital: the art of evaluating proposals.资本配给：评估提案的艺术。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1986 Feb;40(2):75-6.
6
Storyboard. Tough decisions: who gets care during a crisis?情节串联图板。艰难的抉择：危机期间谁能得到治疗？
Hosp Health Netw. 2008 Jun;82(6):18.
7
Ethical evaluation of decision-making for distribution of health resources in China.中国卫生资源分配决策的伦理评估
Med Law. 2007 Jun;26(2):283-9.
8
The desirability of being open about health care rationing decisions: findings from a qualitative study of patients and clinical professionals.公开医疗资源配置决策的可取性：一项针对患者和临床专业人员的定性研究结果。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Jan;15(1):14-20. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009045. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
9
A framework for involving the public in health care coverage and resource allocation decisions.让公众参与医疗保健覆盖范围和资源分配决策的框架。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2008 Winter;21(4):6-21. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60050-6.
10
Rationing based on 'procedures of limited clinical effectiveness': what are the risks?基于“临床有效性有限的程序”进行配给：有哪些风险？
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2012 Apr;73(4):184-5. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2012.73.4.184.
引用本文的文献
1
Development and validation of a medication safety self-assessment tool for primary healthcare settings in China.中国基层医疗卫生机构用药安全自我评估工具的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 5;12:1584286. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1584286. eCollection 2025.
2
Overtreatment: Is a solution possible?过度治疗：是否有解决方案？
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;28(5):821-827. doi: 10.1111/jep.13632. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
All roads lead to coronavirus.一切都指向了冠状病毒。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Mar;113(3):91. doi: 10.1177/0141076820911516.
本文引用的文献
1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, social values and healthcare priority setting.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所、社会价值观与医疗保健优先事项设定
J R Soc Med. 2019 May;112(5):173-179. doi: 10.1177/0141076819842846. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
2
Clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病的磁共振成像的临床应用。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;211(4):231-237. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.195834. Epub 2017 May 4.
3
National Institute for Clinical Excellence: NICE works.国家临床优化研究所：英国国家临床优化研究所卓有成效。
J R Soc Med. 2015 Jun;108(6):211-9. doi: 10.1177/0141076815587658.
4
Choosing Wisely in the UK: the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges' initiative to reduce the harms of too much medicine.英国的明智选择：皇家医学院学会减少过度医疗危害的倡议。
BMJ. 2015 May 12;350:h2308. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2308.
5
Structural neuroimaging in psychosis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.精神病中的结构神经影像学：系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(18):iii-iv, ix-163. doi: 10.3310/hta12180.
6
Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions.情感纽带与金钱纽带：情绪对经济决策的延续效应。
Psychol Sci. 2004 May;15(5):337-41. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x.
7
Incidental radiological findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging in first-episode psychosis and chronic schizophrenia.首发精神病和慢性精神分裂症患者脑磁共振成像的偶然影像学发现。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002 Nov;106(5):331-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02217.x.
8
9
Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers.1000名无症状志愿者脑部磁共振成像的偶然发现。
JAMA. 1999 Jul 7;282(1):36-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.1.36.
Zotero 插件