• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分前额叶对反应性和主动性攻击行为的作用:一项经颅直流电刺激研究

Dissociating prefrontal contribution to reactive and proactive aggression: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

作者信息

Gramegna Chiara, Barbieri Barbara, Bolognini Nadia

机构信息

PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milan, 20126, Italy.

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02087-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00406-025-02087-9
PMID:40839211
Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) plays a crucial role in aggression and that it may be possible to modulate this behavior using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Nevertheless, no previous study has specifically examined the differential effects of bilateral tDCS on reactive and proactive aggression, making the present research the first to explore this distinction using neuromodulation. With this aim, we examined the effect of bi-hemispheric prefrontal tDCS in 30 healthy adults using a double-blind, sham-controlled design. All participants received three types of stimulation over the dlPFC: right anodal/left cathodal, right cathodal/left anodal, and sham tDCS. During the stimulation, participants underwent a modified version of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm, which included two different tasks: one for measuring proactive aggression (i.e., pTAP) and one for reactive aggression (i.e., rTAP). They were also given self-report questionnaires measuring individual levels of aggression, impulsivity, and empathy to test whether these constructs were associated with aggressive responses at the pTAP and rTAP. Results showed increased proactive aggression in males with both active montages, while reactive aggression increased only with right cathodal/left anodal tDCS. Females exhibited increased proactive aggression during right cathodal/left anodal tDCS, but decreased reactive aggression during right anodal/left cathodal stimulation. These findings suggest sex-dependent modulation of aggression via dlPFC stimulation. The relevance of these results extends beyond healthy individuals, as dlPFC dysfunction is a common feature in several psychiatric disorders associated with aggressive behavior. Understanding how tDCS modulates these distinct forms of aggression in healthy populations can inform future research on its therapeutic potential within clinical settings.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)在攻击行为中起着关键作用,并且有可能使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)来调节这种行为。然而,以前没有研究专门研究双侧tDCS对反应性攻击和主动性攻击的不同影响,因此本研究是第一个使用神经调节来探索这种差异的研究。出于这个目的,我们采用双盲、假刺激对照设计,研究了双半球前额叶tDCS对30名健康成年人的影响。所有参与者在dlPFC上接受三种类型的刺激:右阳极/左阴极、右阴极/左阳极和假tDCS。在刺激过程中,参与者接受了泰勒攻击范式的修改版,其中包括两个不同的任务:一个用于测量主动性攻击(即pTAP),一个用于测量反应性攻击(即rTAP)。他们还填写了自我报告问卷,测量个人的攻击水平、冲动性和同理心,以测试这些构念是否与pTAP和rTAP中的攻击反应相关。结果显示,两种有效刺激模式下,男性的主动性攻击均增加,而反应性攻击仅在右阴极/左阳极tDCS时增加。女性在右阴极/左阳极tDCS期间表现出主动性攻击增加,但在右阳极/左阴极刺激期间反应性攻击减少。这些发现表明,通过dlPFC刺激对攻击行为存在性别依赖性调节。这些结果的相关性不仅限于健康个体,因为dlPFC功能障碍是几种与攻击行为相关的精神疾病的共同特征。了解tDCS如何调节健康人群中这些不同形式的攻击行为,可以为未来关于其在临床环境中治疗潜力的研究提供信息。

相似文献

1
Dissociating prefrontal contribution to reactive and proactive aggression: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.区分前额叶对反应性和主动性攻击行为的作用:一项经颅直流电刺激研究
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02087-9.
2
Modulating interhemispheric prefrontal dynamics of aggressive behavior: sex differences and the association with personal disposition.调节攻击行为的半球间前额叶动力学:性别差异及其与个人性格的关联。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01289-x.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
High-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation of left primary motor cortices modulates beta and gamma oscillations serving motor control.对左侧初级运动皮层进行高清经颅直流电刺激可调节用于运动控制的β和γ振荡。
J Physiol. 2025 Mar;603(6):1627-1644. doi: 10.1113/JP287085. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
5
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语症患者语言和交流能力的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD015067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.
6
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on craving and negative emotion regulation in individuals at risk for problematic pornography use: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study.经颅直流电刺激右侧背外侧前额叶皮质对有问题的色情制品使用风险个体的渴望及负性情绪调节的影响:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Apr 15;14(2):1064-1078. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00030. Print 2025 Jul 2.
7
Neuromodulation of risk and reward processing during decision making in individuals with general anxiety disorder (GAD).广泛性焦虑症(GAD)患者决策过程中风险与奖赏处理的神经调节
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84520-y.
8
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3(3):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4.
9
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub5.
10
Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Placebo for Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭式经颅直流电刺激与安慰剂治疗纤维肌痛:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2514262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14262.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural Correlates of Positive Outcome Expectancy for Aggression: Evidence from Voxel-Based Morphometry and Resting-State Functional Connectivity Analysis.攻击行为积极结果预期的神经关联:基于体素的形态测量和静息态功能连接分析的证据。
Brain Sci. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):43. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010043.
2
Brain responses in aggression-prone individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of anger- and aggression-eliciting tasks.攻击性个体的大脑反应:愤怒和攻击诱发任务的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 20;119:110596. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110596. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
3
The brain correlates of state proactive aggression.
状态性主动攻击的大脑相关物。
Neuropsychology. 2022 Mar;36(3):231-242. doi: 10.1037/neu0000791.
4
Prevalence and correlates of aggressive behavior in psychiatric inpatient populations.精神科住院患者攻击性行为的患病率及其相关因素
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):1-23. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i1.1.
5
The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, Iowa Gambling Task and Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Normative Data in an Italian Population Sample.眼神读心测试、爱荷华赌博任务和人际反应指数:意大利人群样本的常模数据。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Jul 19;37(5):929-938. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab100.
6
Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults.经皮质解剖变化介导的 tDCS 电流中的性别差异:跨越年轻、中年和老年成年人的研究。
Brain Stimul. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):125-140. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
7
Proactive vs. Reactive Aggression Within Two Modified Versions of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm.泰勒攻击范式的两个修改版本中的主动攻击与反应性攻击
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Sep 29;15:749041. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.749041. eCollection 2021.
8
Aggression on the psychiatric ward: Prevalence and risk factors. A systematic review of the literature.精神科病房的攻击行为:患病率和危险因素。文献系统综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 8;16(10):e0258346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258346. eCollection 2021.
9
The relationship between physiological reactivity to provocation and emotion dysregulation with proactive and reactive aggression.挑衅时的生理反应与情绪调节能力与主动性攻击和反应性攻击之间的关系。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Sep;155:107931. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107931. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
Response Variability in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Why Sex Matters.经颅直流电刺激中的反应变异性:为何性别至关重要。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 19;11:585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00585. eCollection 2020.