Suppr超能文献

一项改善医院工作人员心理健康的多层面干预措施的有效性:SEEGEN多中心整群随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of a multilevel intervention to improve mental health of hospital workers: The SEEGEN multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mulfinger Nadine, Jarczok Marc N, Müller Andreas, Genrich-Hasken Melanie, Worringer Britta, Küllenberg Janna Katharina, Junne Florian, Rapp Felicitas, Rieger Monika A, Rothermund-Nassir Eva, Ziegenhain Ute, Hander Nicole R, Maatouk Imad, Helaß Madeleine, Peters Martin, Sander Anja, Krisam Regina, Limprecht Ronald, Gesang Elena, Ruhle Sascha A, Süß Stefan, Puschner Bernd, Angerer Peter, Gündel Harald

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University and BKH Günzburg, Günzburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 21;20(8):e0330490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330490. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hospital workers are at high risk for stress-related mental health issues and are considered a vulnerable workforce in most Western countries. Although multilevel interventions that address individual and organizational factors show promise, there is limited robust evidence of their effectiveness in hospital settings. This study evaluated the SEEGEN trial, a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in the German healthcare sector, to assess the effectiveness of a structured multilevel intervention designed to reduce psychosocial stress and to promote mental well-being among hospital employees. The intervention included five modules that targeted different hierarchical levels, sources of interpersonal and structural stress, and potentially vulnerable life stages. These modules were: (i) top management training, (ii) dilemma management - coping by taking responsibility, (iii) promoting stress-preventive relational leadership competence, (iv) reconciling work and family life, and (v) staying healthy at work.

METHODS

The study was conducted at three clinical centers in Germany and included 18 clusters with a total of N = 415 participants. The clusters were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a wait-list control group. The primary outcome was psychological strain (Irritation Scale; IRR), and the secondary outcomes were mental well-being (WHO-5) and perceived psychosocial safety climate, (PSC-12). Intervention effects were estimated using a two-level linear analysis of covariance. Changes from baseline to the 11-month follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

The intervention had no statistically significant effect on the primary or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of significant effects may be attributed to low participation rates, an insufficient intervention dosage, and contextual factors, such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and staffing shortages in the participating hospitals. Although the intervention cannot currently be recommended for widespread implementation, the study provides valuable insights into developing, delivering, and overcoming the challenges of multilevel workplace interventions in healthcare settings.

摘要

引言

在大多数西方国家,医院工作人员面临与压力相关的心理健康问题的风险很高,被视为弱势群体。尽管针对个人和组织因素的多层次干预措施显示出了前景,但在医院环境中,关于其有效性的有力证据有限。本研究评估了SEEGEN试验,这是一项在德国医疗保健部门进行的整群随机对照试验,旨在评估一种结构化多层次干预措施的有效性,该措施旨在减轻医院员工的心理社会压力并促进其心理健康。该干预措施包括五个模块,针对不同的层级、人际和结构压力源以及潜在的脆弱生活阶段。这些模块分别是:(i)高层管理人员培训,(ii)困境管理——通过承担责任来应对,(iii)提升预防压力的关系型领导能力,(iv)协调工作与家庭生活,以及(v)在工作中保持健康。

方法

该研究在德国的三个临床中心进行,包括18个整群,共有N = 415名参与者。这些整群被随机分配到干预组或等待名单对照组。主要结局是心理压力(易怒量表;IRR),次要结局是心理健康(WHO-5)和感知心理社会安全氛围(PSC-12)。使用两级线性协方差分析估计干预效果。分析了从基线到11个月随访的变化。

结果

该干预措施对主要或次要结局没有统计学上的显著影响。

结论

缺乏显著效果可能归因于参与率低、干预剂量不足以及诸如SARS-CoV-2大流行和参与医院人员短缺等背景因素。尽管目前不建议广泛实施该干预措施,但该研究为在医疗环境中开发、实施和克服多层次工作场所干预措施的挑战提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9e/12370060/b9bba7eada50/pone.0330490.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验