Rostami Kimia, Ghasemi Mostafa, Sedighi Mehdi, Fauzi Ismail Ahmad, Rezk Hegazy, Kuo Jenn-Kun
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Yangtze Delta Region Institute (Huzhou), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Huzhou, 313001, China; Chemical Engineering Section, Faculty of Engineering, Sohar University, 311 Sohar, Oman.
Bioelectrochemistry. 2026 Feb;167:109083. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2025.109083. Epub 2025 Aug 16.
This study investigates the comparative performance of two types of ion-exchange membranes, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as an anion exchange membrane (AEM) and Nafion 117 as a cation exchange membrane (CEM), in microbial fuel cells(MFCs). The evaluation focuses on key operational parameters, including power generation, chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency, and coulombic efficiency (CE). In CEM-based MFCs, protons (H) migrate from the anode to the cathode, whereas in AEM-based systems, hydroxide ions (OH) move from the cathode to the anode. This ion transfer helps maintain pH balance, which is essential for microbial metabolism and catalytic activity. Experimental results demonstrated that the CEM-MFC achieved a power density of 181.5 mW/m and a COD removal rate of 67 %, while the AEM-MFC produced 272.3 mW/m and achieved 75 % COD removal. Furthermore, the CE improved from 24.4 % in CEM-MFC to 29 % in AEM-MFC. These results indicate that AEM-MFCs can generate approximately 50 % more power and exhibit enhanced CE, making them more promising candidates for sustainable energy production and wastewater treatment. The superior performance of AEM-MFC is attributed to more favorable microbial activity, better cathodic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) conditions, and extended pH equilibrium. Additionally, the efficient transfer of OH ions in AEMs prevents acidification in the anode compartment and supports stable microbial growth. These findings underscore the potential of anion exchange membranes as viable and sustainable alternatives in the design of high-performance MFCs for simultaneous environmental remediation and bioenergy production. This study is a pioneering work that investigates the long-term performance of cost-effective PTFE anion exchange membranes in microbial fuel cells operating with real wastewater (POME), providing crucial insights into pH regulation and microbial stability compared to the benchmark Nafion 117.
本研究调查了两种离子交换膜,即作为阴离子交换膜(AEM)的聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)和作为阳离子交换膜(CEM)的Nafion 117,在微生物燃料电池(MFC)中的比较性能。评估重点在于关键运行参数,包括发电、化学需氧量(COD)去除效率和库仑效率(CE)。在基于CEM的MFC中,质子(H⁺)从阳极迁移到阴极,而在基于AEM的系统中,氢氧根离子(OH⁻)从阴极移动到阳极。这种离子转移有助于维持pH平衡,这对微生物代谢和催化活性至关重要。实验结果表明,CEM-MFC的功率密度达到181.5 mW/m²,COD去除率为67%,而AEM-MFC产生272.3 mW/m²,COD去除率达到75%。此外,CE从CEM-MFC中的24.4%提高到AEM-MFC中的29%。这些结果表明,AEM-MFC可以产生大约多50%的功率并表现出更高的CE,使其成为可持续能源生产和废水处理更有前景的候选者。AEM-MFC的卓越性能归因于更有利的微生物活性、更好的阴极氧还原反应(ORR)条件和更广泛的pH平衡。此外,AEM中OH⁻离子的有效转移可防止阳极室酸化并支持稳定的微生物生长。这些发现强调了阴离子交换膜在设计用于同时进行环境修复和生物能源生产的高性能MFC中作为可行且可持续替代品的潜力。本研究是一项开创性工作,研究了具有成本效益的PTFE阴离子交换膜在处理实际废水(棕榈油厂废水)的微生物燃料电池中的长期性能,与基准Nafion 117相比,提供了关于pH调节和微生物稳定性的关键见解。