• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理专业学生学术毅力量表中文版的翻译与验证:心理测量学评价的横断面研究

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the academic grit scale among nursing students: a cross-sectional study of psychometric evaluation.

作者信息

Wang Song, Yu Youqing

机构信息

Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Sichuan Nursing Vocational College, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Aug;87:104518. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104518. Epub 2025 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104518
PMID:40840077
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Academic Grit Scale for nursing students.

BACKGROUND

Grit, defined as perseverance and passion for long-term goals, is widely recognized as a predictor of success in demanding fields like nursing. Valid and reliable instruments are needed to assess grit, particularly in the academic context among Chinese nursing students, given potential cultural influences.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional descriptive design.

METHODS

A total of 450 nursing students from two local medical universities completed the Academic Grit Scale, the Short Grit Scale and the Big Five Inventory and reported grade point average. Data were analyzed for item characteristics, reliability (Cronbach's α and split-half), content validity (expert review), structural validity (confirmatory factor analysis), convergent and discriminant validity (correlations) and criterion validity (hierarchical regression).

RESULTS

The Chinese Academic Grit Scale had good item discrimination, high internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.94, split-half coefficient = 0.92) and excellent content validity (item content validity index = 0.80-1.00, average content validity index = 0.96). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original one-factor structure (χ/df = 4.92, p < 0.001). The scale showed good convergent and discriminant validity with general grit and Big Five personalities and satisfactory criterion validity such that the score could explain incremental variance in predicting grade point average.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese Academic Grit Scale is a reliable and valid measure of academic grit among nursing students. It has potential value in identifying students who may benefit from interventions to cultivate academic grit and success.

摘要

目的

评估中文版护理专业学生学术毅力量表的心理测量特性。

背景

毅力被定义为对长期目标的坚持不懈和热情,在护理等要求较高的领域,它被广泛认为是成功的预测指标。鉴于潜在的文化影响,需要有效且可靠的工具来评估毅力,尤其是在中国护理专业学生的学术背景下。

设计

横断面描述性设计。

方法

来自两所当地医科大学的450名护理专业学生完成了学术毅力量表、简短毅力量表和大五人格量表,并报告了平均绩点。对数据进行了项目特征、信度(克朗巴哈α系数和分半信度)、内容效度(专家评审)、结构效度(验证性因素分析)、聚合效度和区分效度(相关性)以及效标效度(层次回归)分析。

结果

中文版学术毅力量表具有良好的项目区分度、较高的内部信度(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.94,分半系数 = 0.92)和出色的内容效度(项目内容效度指数 = 0.80 - 1.00,平均内容效度指数 = 0.96)。验证性因素分析支持原有的单因素结构(χ/df = 4.92,p < 0.001)。该量表在与一般毅力和大五人格的聚合效度和区分效度方面表现良好,效标效度也令人满意,即该分数能够解释预测平均绩点时的增量方差。

结论

中文版学术毅力量表是一种可靠且有效的护理专业学生学术毅力测量工具。它在识别可能从培养学术毅力和成功的干预措施中受益的学生方面具有潜在价值。

相似文献

1
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the academic grit scale among nursing students: a cross-sectional study of psychometric evaluation.护理专业学生学术毅力量表中文版的翻译与验证:心理测量学评价的横断面研究
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Aug;87:104518. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104518. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
2
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
3
Self-efficacy in clinical performance scale: A psychometric validity study with nursing students.临床操作自我效能感量表:一项针对护理专业学生的心理测量效度研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Aug;87:104471. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104471. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
4
Psychometric Evaluation of the Core Competencies in Disaster Nursing Scale for Disaster Rescue Nurses in Mainland China.中国大陆灾害救援护士灾害护理核心能力量表的心理测量学评价
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Aug 10;2025:9957270. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9957270. eCollection 2025.
5
Arabic translation and validation of the gameful experience scale among Saudi Arabian nursing students: Psychometric properties and measurement invariance across gender.沙特阿拉伯护理专业学生游戏化体验量表的阿拉伯语翻译与验证:心理测量特性及跨性别测量不变性
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Aug;87:104492. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104492. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
6
Measuring Managerial, Collegial, and Organizational Aspects Associated With Digital Health Competence in Healthcare Professionals: Validation of the Chinese Version of the DigiComInf Instrument.衡量医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力相关的管理、同事关系和组织方面:DigiComInf工具中文版的验证
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jun 16;2025:8854459. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8854459. eCollection 2025.
7
Turkish Version of the Sense of Belonging in Nursing School Scale: Validity and Reliability for Nursing Students.护理学校归属感量表的土耳其语版本:护理专业学生的效度与信度
J Nurs Meas. 2025 Jul 14;33(2):188-197. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2023-0118.
8
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC) in nursing students.西班牙语版医疗保健提供者开放思维量表(OMS-HC)在护理专业学生中的心理测量特性。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Aug;87:104469. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104469. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
9
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the M.D. Anderson symptom Inventory-Multiple Myeloma Module: a translation and validation study.中文版安德森癌症中心症状量表-多发性骨髓瘤模块的心理测量学特性:一项翻译与验证研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14054-7.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian nursing students' learning self-efficacy instrument.波斯语版护理专业学生学习自我效能感量表的心理测量学评估
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0331435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331435. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and psychometric validation of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale (MAIRS-MS) for Chinese medical students.中国医学生医学人工智能准备量表(MAIRS-MS)的翻译与心理测量学验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Sep 29;24(1):1210. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03852-w.