Sui Wilson, Suarez Pablo, Yang Heiko, Escobar Maria Camila Velasquez, Maluf Feres Camargo, Hall Taylor, Azzawi Sultan Al, Gupta Lavanya, Chi Thomas
Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01895-4.
Financial toxicity (FT), first reported in oncologic patients and generally defined as harm to patients caused by the cost of treatment, is less well described in non-malignant urology. In chronic conditions related to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), such as BPH, treatment costs may result in a significant substantial burden. The goal of this study was to characterize the association between FT and LUTS.
A cross-sectional web-based survey was administered to a random sample of adult men through a national registry of volunteers (ResearchMatch). Disease-specific information, validated symptom scores, and an 11-item measure of LUTS-related financial toxicity were used to characterize participants. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of financial toxicity.
A total of 294 respondents with a self-reported history of BPH-associated LUTS were included, 41% of whom met the criteria for financial toxicity. Men with FT had worse LUTS symptom scores across all measures ( < 0.001). The presence of stress, urge, or mixed incontinence was significantly higher in men with FT (52% vs. 8%, 46% vs. 15%, and 36% vs. 5% respectively; < 0.001). Men with FT spent more out-of-pocket on incontinence products than those without FT ( < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, mixed incontinence was a predictor of FT (OR 3.233, 95% CI 1.15–9.084).
Two of five men with LUTS met the criteria for financial toxicity. These men had worse urinary symptom scores, higher rates of all types of incontinence, and higher out-of-pocket costs for incontinence products.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-025-01895-4.
经济毒性(FT)首次在肿瘤患者中被报道,通常定义为治疗费用对患者造成的伤害,在非恶性泌尿外科疾病中描述较少。在与下尿路症状(LUTS)相关的慢性疾病中,如良性前列腺增生(BPH),治疗费用可能会导致巨大负担。本研究的目的是描述经济毒性与LUTS之间的关联。
通过全国志愿者登记系统(ResearchMatch)对成年男性随机样本进行基于网络的横断面调查。使用疾病特异性信息、经过验证的症状评分以及一项包含11个项目的LUTS相关经济毒性测量指标来描述参与者。进行多变量逻辑回归以确定经济毒性的预测因素。
共纳入294名有BPH相关LUTS自我报告病史的受访者,其中41%符合经济毒性标准。患有经济毒性的男性在所有测量指标上的LUTS症状评分更差(<0.001)。患有经济毒性的男性中压力性、急迫性或混合性尿失禁的发生率显著更高(分别为52%对8%、46%对15%、36%对5%;<0.001)。患有经济毒性的男性在尿失禁产品上的自付费用比没有经济毒性的男性更多(<0.001)。在多变量分析中,混合性尿失禁是经济毒性的一个预测因素(OR 3.233,95%CI 1.15 - 9.084)。
五分之二的LUTS男性符合经济毒性标准。这些男性的泌尿症状评分更差,各类尿失禁发生率更高,且尿失禁产品的自付费用更高。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12894 - 025 - 01895 - 4获取的补充材料。