Suppr超能文献

比较有无肺气肿的特发性肺纤维化患者接受抗纤维化治疗后的生存结局:一项来自台湾的多中心真实世界研究。

Comparing survival outcomes of anti-fibrotic therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with and without emphysema: a multi-center real-world study from Taiwan.

作者信息

Fang Yu-Hung, Hsieh Yi-An, Chen Yen-Fu, Chiu Yu-Chi, Lin Yu-Ching, Huang Kuo-Tung, Huang Yung-Chia, Wei Yu-Feng, Huang Chien-Wen, Fu Pin-Kuei

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chiayi Branch, Chiayi, Taiwan.

Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi Campus, Chiayi, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03890-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether the long-term survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is worse than that of patients with IPF combined with emphysema after anti-fibrotic therapy is unclear. This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes between the two groups and identify potential predictors of mortality.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in seven hospitals across Taiwan between August 2015 and August 2022 and included patients with IPF who received anti-fibrotic agents covered by national insurance. Based on the extent of emphysema observed on high-resolution chest tomography, patients with IPF were categorized into two groups: IPF only; and IPF with emphysema. Baseline characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariable analysis to identify factors associated with overall mortality during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Of the 275 patients included, 126 (45.8%) had IPF with emphysema and 149 (54.2%) had IPF only. The emphysema group had a higher proportion of males and patients with a smoking history, finger clubbing, comorbidities, or a definite usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern compared to the IPF-only group. Additionally, this group had a higher forced vital capacity (FVC, %) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁, L), while FEV₁ (%) was similar and FEV₁/FVC (%) was lower. During a median follow-up of 3.7 years, the overall survival rates were comparable (IPF only: 45.6%; IPF with emphysema: 48.4%). The overall survival of patients with probable UIP was significantly better than that of patients with definite UIP (53.5% vs. 34.6%). Likewise, the survival rate of the group with a diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) > 49% was higher than that of the group with DLCO ≤ 49% (53.9% vs. 31.4%). After adjusting for confounders, lower body mass index (BMI) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.95) and comorbid pulmonary hypertension (aHR = 2.27) were independently associated with increased overall mortality. Neither the presence of emphysema nor the type of anti-fibrotic agent was associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival outcomes of patients with IPF and emphysema and those of patients with IPF only are comparable after treatment with anti-fibrotic agents. Lower BMI and comorbid pulmonary hypertension are significant predictors of increased mortality.

摘要

背景

特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者在接受抗纤维化治疗后的长期生存率是否低于合并肺气肿的IPF患者尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较两组的治疗结果,并确定潜在的死亡预测因素。

方法

本回顾性队列研究于2015年8月至2022年8月在台湾的七家医院进行,纳入接受国家保险覆盖的抗纤维化药物治疗的IPF患者。根据高分辨率胸部断层扫描观察到的肺气肿程度,将IPF患者分为两组:单纯IPF;以及合并肺气肿的IPF。比较两组的基线特征和生存结果。采用Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析,以确定随访期间与总死亡率相关的因素。

结果

在纳入的275例患者中,126例(45.8%)合并肺气肿的IPF患者,149例(54.2%)为单纯IPF患者。与单纯IPF组相比,肺气肿组男性、有吸烟史、杵状指、合并症或明确的普通型间质性肺炎(UIP)模式的患者比例更高。此外,该组的用力肺活量(FVC,%)和第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁,L)更高,而FEV₁(%)相似,FEV₁/FVC(%)更低。在中位随访3.7年期间,总体生存率相当(单纯IPF:45.6%;合并肺气肿的IPF:48.4%)。可能的UIP患者的总生存率显著高于明确的UIP患者(53.5%对34.6%)。同样,一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)>49%组的生存率高于DLCO≤49%组(53.9%对31.4%)。在调整混杂因素后,较低的体重指数(BMI)(调整后风险比[aHR]=0.95)和合并肺动脉高压(aHR=2.27)与总死亡率增加独立相关。肺气肿的存在和抗纤维化药物的类型均与死亡率无关。

结论

抗纤维化药物治疗后,合并肺气肿的IPF患者和单纯IPF患者的生存结果相当。较低的BMI和合并肺动脉高压是死亡率增加的重要预测因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验