Salgarello Marzia, Pino Valentina Sara, Taraschi Federico, Visconti Giuseppe, Cellini Francesco, Marazzi Fabio, Masiello Valeria, Adesi Liliana Barone
UO Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS - Università Cattolica del "Sacro Cuore" - Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del "Sacro Cuore" - Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05119-w.
Increasingly popular, prepectoral breast reconstruction preserves the pectoralis major muscle's anatomy and function. Although polyurethane-coated implants in this context have yielded encouraging results, their interplay with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is not well-documented, particularly considering PMRT's known adverse effects on implant-based reconstructions. The study aimed to evaluate the aesthetic outcomes and radiation therapy (RT) damage in patients undergoing prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implants receiving PMRT, as well as the influence of mastectomy flap thickness on RT side effects.
In 47 patients receiving immediate breast reconstruction with prepectoral polyurethane-coated implants followed by PMRT, aesthetic results were assessed using the Likert scale, and RT damage was scored with the LENT-SOMA scale. The study retrospectively analyzed the impact of different RT techniques (3D vs. IMRT) and examined the correlation between mastectomy flap thickness and RT adverse effects.
At 12-month follow-up, the mean Likert score for patients treated with IMRT/VMAT was 13.06 (SD: 2.55) compared to 11.79 (SD: 2.37) for those treated with the 3D technique. LENT-SOMA scores were 1.46 (SD: 1.13) for IMRT/VMAT and 3.11 (SD: 1.41) for 3D. A negative linear correlation was found between mastectomy flap thickness and RT damage.
Preliminary findings are favorable for the use of prepectoral polyurethane-coated implants in immediate breast reconstruction with PMRT, particularly when using IMRT and in patients with thicker mastectomy flaps. Level III, therapeutic study.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
胸肌前乳房重建越来越受欢迎,它保留了胸大肌的解剖结构和功能。尽管在这种情况下聚氨酯涂层植入物已取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但它们与乳房切除术后放疗(PMRT)之间的相互作用尚无充分记录,特别是考虑到PMRT对基于植入物的重建已知的不良影响。本研究旨在评估接受PMRT的使用聚氨酯涂层植入物进行胸肌前重建的患者的美学效果和放疗(RT)损伤,以及乳房切除皮瓣厚度对RT副作用的影响。
对47例接受胸肌前聚氨酯涂层植入物即刻乳房重建并随后接受PMRT的患者,使用李克特量表评估美学效果,并用LENT-SOMA量表对RT损伤进行评分。该研究回顾性分析了不同RT技术(三维适形放疗[3D]与调强放疗[IMRT])的影响,并研究了乳房切除皮瓣厚度与RT不良反应之间的相关性。
在12个月的随访中,接受IMRT/容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)治疗的患者的平均李克特评分为13.06(标准差:2.55),而接受3D技术治疗的患者为11.79(标准差:2.37)。IMRT/VMAT的LENT-SOMA评分为1.46(标准差:1.13),3D为3.11(标准差:1.41)。发现乳房切除皮瓣厚度与RT损伤之间存在负线性相关性。
初步研究结果有利于在PMRT即刻乳房重建中使用胸肌前聚氨酯涂层植入物,特别是在使用IMRT时以及乳房切除皮瓣较厚的患者中。三级,治疗性研究。
证据水平III:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。