• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我管理干预措施对18至45岁年轻成年人2型糖尿病的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of self-management interventions on Type 2 diabetes among young adults (18-45 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Khavere Sonia, Hadjiconstantinou Michelle, Miksza Joanne, Hagan Jenny, Salisu-Olatunji Shukrat, Naderpour Sara, Hassen Sarah Nalir, Karimi Zahra, Gillies Clare L

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2025 Oct;42(10):e70127. doi: 10.1111/dme.70127. Epub 2025 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1111/dme.70127
PMID:40842272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12434426/
Abstract

AIMS

Self-management interventions effectively improve health outcomes in adults with Type 2 diabetes. Young adults living with Type 2 diabetes are at a higher risk of diabetes-related complications, hospitalisation and reduced quality of life. While self-management is key in diabetes care, its effectiveness in young adults with Type 2 diabetes remains unclear. This review assessed self-management interventions' impact on health outcomes in young adults (18-45 years) with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2024. Trials evaluating self-management interventions versus usual care in young adults were included. Outcomes of interest were clinical, self-care behaviour and psychological health. Meta-analysis used a random effects model; study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2) and the JBI checklist for quasi-experimental studies. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024522979).

RESULTS

Ten studies were included, nine in the meta-analysis, which reported no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in HbA1c, body mass index, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipids, depression or self-efficacy outcomes. Nevertheless, these findings are imprecise due to few studies, missing data and small sample sizes. Commonly used behaviour change techniques were goals and planning, shaping knowledge and feedback/monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing self-management interventions did not improve clinical and psychological outcomes among young adults (18-45 years) living with Type 2 diabetes. More effective strategies are needed for this priority population.

摘要

目的

自我管理干预措施能有效改善2型糖尿病成年人的健康状况。患有2型糖尿病的年轻人患糖尿病相关并发症、住院和生活质量下降的风险更高。虽然自我管理是糖尿病护理的关键,但其在2型糖尿病年轻人中的有效性仍不明确。本综述评估了自我管理干预措施对18至45岁2型糖尿病年轻人健康状况的影响。

方法

检索了五个电子数据库,检索时间从建库至2024年5月。纳入评估年轻人自我管理干预措施与常规护理的试验。关注的结果包括临床、自我护理行为和心理健康。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型;研究质量使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB2)和JBI准实验研究清单进行评估。本综述遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO(CRD42024522979)上进行了注册。

结果

纳入了10项研究,其中9项纳入荟萃分析,结果显示干预组和对照组在糖化血红蛋白、体重指数、体重、腰围、血压、血脂、抑郁或自我效能结果方面无显著差异。然而,由于研究数量少、数据缺失和样本量小,这些结果并不精确。常用的行为改变技术包括目标与计划、塑造知识以及反馈/监测。

结论

现有的自我管理干预措施并未改善18至45岁2型糖尿病年轻人的临床和心理结果。这一重点人群需要更有效的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1a3/12434426/d6c74f9e4f59/DME-42-e70127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1a3/12434426/d6c74f9e4f59/DME-42-e70127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1a3/12434426/d6c74f9e4f59/DME-42-e70127-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of self-management interventions on Type 2 diabetes among young adults (18-45 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis.自我管理干预措施对18至45岁年轻成年人2型糖尿病的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2025 Oct;42(10):e70127. doi: 10.1111/dme.70127. Epub 2025 Aug 21.
2
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.为患有慢性或长期健康问题的成年人制定个性化护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 3;2015(3):CD010523. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010523.pub2.
3
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.青少年医疗护理从儿科服务向成人健康服务的过渡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
6
Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病成年患者糖尿病相关困扰的心理干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 27;9(9):CD011469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011469.pub2.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Physical activity for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.体力活动治疗肠易激综合征。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 29;6(6):CD011497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011497.pub2.
10
Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the preferences of young adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus with regard to diabetes self-management education: a qualitative study.了解年轻 2 型糖尿病患者对糖尿病自我管理教育的偏好:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):e086133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086133.
2
Alarming rise in young-onset type 2 diabetes.青年发病型2型糖尿病急剧增加。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Jul;12(7):433. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00161-X. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
Which behaviour change techniques work best for diabetes self-management mobile apps? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
哪种行为改变技术最适用于糖尿病自我管理移动应用程序?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析结果。
EBioMedicine. 2024 May;103:105091. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105091. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
4
Technology and health inequities in diabetes care: How do we widen access to underserved populations and utilize technology to improve outcomes for all?糖尿病护理中的技术和健康不平等:我们如何扩大服务不足人群的获取途径,并利用技术改善所有人的结局?
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Mar;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/dom.15470. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
5
Exploring the Effectiveness of Self-Management Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.探索2型糖尿病自我管理干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 22;12(1):27. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010027.
6
Mobile Health Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.移动医疗干预在 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2333629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33629.
7
Developing digital mental health tools for youth with diabetes: an agenda for future research.为患有糖尿病的青少年开发数字心理健康工具:未来研究议程
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2023 Jul 11;4:1227332. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1227332. eCollection 2023.
8
Global burden of type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults, 1990-2019: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.全球青少年 2 型糖尿病负担,1990-2019 年:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
BMJ. 2022 Dec 7;379:e072385. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072385.
9
Effectiveness of a Community-Based Structured Physical Activity Program for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于社区的结构化身体活动方案对 2 型糖尿病成人的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2247858. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47858.
10
The effectiveness of patient-centered care vs. usual care in type 2 diabetes self-management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.患者为中心的护理与常规护理在 2 型糖尿病自我管理中的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;10:994766. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994766. eCollection 2022.