Pascoal Patrícia M, Andersson Gerhard, Fischer Vinicius J, Manão Andreia A, Oliveira Cátia, Raposo Catarina F, Rosa Pedro J, Roberto Magda Sofia, Santos Graça, Tomada Nuno, Giraldi Annamaria
Lusófona University, HEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, Lisbon, Portugal.
Clínica Universitária de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1553893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1553893. eCollection 2025.
Sexual distress is interrelated with mental health and relationship quality and is fundamental for establishing a diagnosis of sexual dysfunction, even though it also affects people who do not seek professional clinical help. Research on sexual distress related to partnered sexual activity is limited, and no comprehensive model exists to guide research or clinical interventions. We conducted an online cross-sectional qualitative study to: 1) explore the reasons why people experiencing sexual distress in partnered face-to-face sexual activity do not seek professional clinical help; 2) analyze the experiences of participants' of sexual distress in partnered sexual activity; 3) reflexively compare the experiences reported by participants who seek and do not seek professional help; and 4) reflexively compare experiences across genders.
We performed reflexive thematic analysis on 438 heterosexual people answers ( = 41.06, = 12.19), including 306 women (69.7%) and 132 men (30.1%).
Most participants (54.1%) had not sought professional clinical help but wanted to do so. Some participants (13.2%) expressed a desire for clinical consultations but reported financial or time constraints. Using the reflexive thematic analysis on the qualitative data provided, we created three themes: (1) Sexual (dys)function (It's the function), which focuses on sexual function and lack of pleasure; (2) Intimacy dynamics (It's us!), which discusses relationship challenges; (3) Intrapersonal struggles (It's me!), which highlight individual factors, some influenced by social messages. Comparison across groups revealed that people who sought professional clinical help emphasise genital function and negative emotions, and women highlighted experiencing sexual pain, while men emphasised desire discrepancies and erectile disorder.
Our results demonstrate that difficulties related to sexual pleasure and with penetrative sex are important sources of distress in partnered sexual activity, which is in line with DSM and ICD frameworks of sexual dysfunction. Participants' accounts show that pre-existing psychological characteristics, partnered communication, cognitive, and emotional factors are key factors to shape the experience of sexual distress related to sexual dysfunctions. This has implications for clinical work as interventions should target transdiagnostic individual factors that may not be sexual specific (e.g., repetitive negative thinking) as well as couple-level factors (e.g., communication). Internet-based integrative therapies directed at these factors may be a promising venue for those who experience sexual distress with partnered sexual activity and are reluctant to seek in-person sexual healthcare.
性困扰与心理健康及人际关系质量相互关联,是诊断性功能障碍的重要依据,即便它也会影响那些未寻求专业临床帮助的人群。关于与伴侣性行为相关的性困扰的研究较为有限,且尚无全面的模型来指导研究或临床干预。我们开展了一项在线横断面定性研究,目的如下:1)探究在伴侣面对面性行为中经历性困扰的人群不寻求专业临床帮助的原因;2)分析参与者在伴侣性行为中性困扰的经历;3)反思性地比较寻求和未寻求专业帮助的参与者所报告的经历;4)反思性地比较不同性别的经历。
我们对438名异性恋者的回答进行了反思性主题分析(年龄均值=41.06岁,标准差=12.19岁),其中包括306名女性(69.7%)和132名男性(30.1%)。
大多数参与者(54.1%)未寻求专业临床帮助,但有此意愿。一些参与者(13.2%)表示希望进行临床咨询,但称存在经济或时间限制。通过对所提供的定性数据进行反思性主题分析,我们确定了三个主题:(1)性(功能障碍)(是功能的问题),聚焦于性功能及缺乏快感;(2)亲密关系动态(是我们的问题!),讨论关系中的挑战;(3)个人内心挣扎(是我的问题!),突出个体因素,其中一些受社会信息影响。不同组间的比较显示,寻求专业临床帮助的人强调生殖器官功能和负面情绪,女性强调经历性疼痛,而男性强调欲望差异和勃起功能障碍。
我们的结果表明,与性快感及插入式性行为相关的困难是伴侣性行为中困扰的重要来源,这与性功能障碍的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)和《国际疾病分类》(ICD)框架相符。参与者的叙述表明,既有的心理特征、伴侣间的沟通、认知和情感因素是塑造与性功能障碍相关的性困扰体验的关键因素。这对临床工作具有启示意义,因为干预措施应针对可能并非特定于性方面的跨诊断个体因素(例如反复的消极思维)以及伴侣层面的因素(例如沟通)。针对这些因素的基于互联网的综合疗法可能是那些在伴侣性行为中经历性困扰且不愿寻求面对面性健康护理的人的一个有前景的途径。