Zhiyun Tan, Yonghong Dai, Qingyu Li, Yanhui Zeng, Kuangyang Yang, Xing Chen
The Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 6;12:1639649. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1639649. eCollection 2025.
Accurate spatial positioning is the key to the precise implantation of coracoid screws. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and current issues of TiRobot ForcePro Superior (TFS) in the treatment of scapular coracoid fractures by comparing it with the freehand screw implantation technique.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 29 patients with scapular coracoid fractures who underwent surgical treatment at Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from 2019 to 2024. Based on the surgical approach, the patients were divided into the robot-assisted group ( = 15) and the control group ( = 14). In the robot-assisted group, the TFS system was utilized to plan the optimal screw trajectory, and the surgeon implanted the guide pin along the mechanical arm sleeve of the TFS, followed by precise screw placement along the guide pin to fix the coracoid fracture. In the control group, screws were implanted freehand by the surgeon.
The intraoperative blood loss and incision length in the robot-assisted group were significantly less than those in the control group. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in the robot-assisted group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The shoulder function scores in the robot-assisted group were significantly higher than those in the control group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, hospital stay, screw placement accuracy, incidence of postoperative complications, or fracture healing time.
Compared with freehand screw implantation, minimally invasive treatment for scapular coracoid fractures assisted by TFS significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss, shortened incision length, alleviated pain, and better promoted the recovery of shoulder joint function.
精确的空间定位是喙突螺钉精确植入的关键。本研究旨在通过将TiRobot ForcePro Superior(TFS)与徒手螺钉植入技术进行比较,探讨其在治疗肩胛喙突骨折中的疗效及当前存在的问题。
对2019年至2024年在佛山市中医院接受手术治疗的29例肩胛喙突骨折患者的病历进行回顾性分析。根据手术方式,将患者分为机器人辅助组(n = 15)和对照组(n = 14)。在机器人辅助组中,利用TFS系统规划最佳螺钉轨迹,外科医生沿着TFS的机械臂套管植入导针,然后沿着导针精确放置螺钉以固定喙突骨折。在对照组中,外科医生徒手植入螺钉。
机器人辅助组的术中出血量和切口长度明显少于对照组。机器人辅助组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分明显低于对照组。机器人辅助组的肩关节功能评分明显高于对照组。两组在手术时间、住院时间、螺钉置入准确性、术后并发症发生率或骨折愈合时间方面均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
与徒手螺钉植入相比,TFS辅助下的肩胛喙突骨折微创治疗显著减少了术中出血量,缩短了切口长度,减轻了疼痛,并更好地促进了肩关节功能的恢复。