• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗先天性巨结肠患儿的比较:系统评价与Meta分析

Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted surgery in the treatment of children with Hirschsprung's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Zikang, Li Wanfu, Wang Haojun, Xu Mengxue

机构信息

Department of Pediatric General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2025 Aug 6;13:1638198. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1638198. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1638198
PMID:40843072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12364639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to systematically evaluate the differences between robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) in intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and prognostic outcomes for children with Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR). By conducting a meta-analysis, evidence-based insights for clinical practice were sought.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to May 10, 2025, to identify comparative studies of RAS and LAS for HSCR. Two reviewers independently screened literature and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (OS). RevMan5.4 and STATA18 were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with heterogeneity and publication bias evaluated.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 789 children (352 RAS, 437 LAS) were included. Meta-analysis showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss in the RAS group (OR = -6.45, 95%CI: -11.77 to -1.14,  = 0.02) but longer operative duration (OR = 19.74, 95%CI: 1.75-37.72,  = 0.03). No significant group differences were found in postoperative enterocolitis (OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.43-1.01,  = 0.06), anastomotic complications (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.35-1.45,  = 0.35), soiling (OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.39-1.60,  = 0.51), adhesive intestinal obstruction (OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 0.22-11.32,  = 0.66), wound infection (OR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.19-3.01,  = 0.70), incisional hernia (OR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.20-6.40,  = 0.89), perianal infection (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.40-1.23,  = 0.22), urinary retention (OR = 0.23, 95%CI: 0.01-3.59,  = 0.29), or gastrointestinal function recovery time (OR = -1.27, 95%CI: -3.70-1.15,  = 0.30). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RAS group (OR = -0.39, 95%CI: -0.69--0.10,  = 0.009). Egger's test and funnel plot analysis indicated no significant publication bias ( = 0.987).

CONCLUSIONS

RAS confers advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss and shortening hospital stay, although it is associated with a longer operative duration. However, no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications was noted between RAS and LAS, a finding potentially attributable to the limited sample size. Furthermore, the currently elevated treatment cost of RAS may impede its widespread adoption due to economic limitations. Consequently, large-sample, multicenter randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up periods are warranted to validate long-term outcomes and conduct in-depth investigations into cost-effectiveness.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD420251051595.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在系统评估机器人辅助手术(RAS)与腹腔镜辅助手术(LAS)在先天性巨结肠症(HSCR)患儿的术中参数、术后并发症及预后结果方面的差异。通过进行荟萃分析,寻求基于证据的临床实践见解。

方法

按照PRISMA指南,检索截至2025年5月10日的PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,以确定RAS和LAS用于HSCR的比较研究。两名审阅者独立筛选文献并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估质量。使用RevMan5.4和STATA18计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),并评估异质性和发表偏倚。

结果

纳入6项研究,共789例患儿(RAS组352例,LAS组437例)。荟萃分析显示,RAS组术中出血量显著减少(OR = -6.45,95%CI:-11.77至-1.14,P = 0.02),但手术时间较长(OR = 19.74,95%CI:1.75 - 37.72,P = 0.03)。术后小肠结肠炎(OR = 0.66, 95%CI:0.43 - 1.01, P = 0.06)、吻合口并发症(OR = 0.71, 95%CI:0.35 - 1.45, P = 0.35)、污粪(OR = 0.79, 95%CI:0.39 - 1.60, P = 0.51)、粘连性肠梗阻(OR = 1.56, 95%CI:0.22 - 11.32, P = 0.66)、伤口感染(OR = 0.77, 95%CI:0.19 - 3.01, P = 0.70)、切口疝(OR = 1.13, 95%CI:0.20 - 6.40, P = 0.89)、肛周感染(OR = 0.70, 95%CI:0.40 - 1.23, P = 0.22)、尿潴留(OR = 0.23, 95%CI:0.01 - 3.59, P = 0.29)或胃肠功能恢复时间(OR = -1.27, 95%CI:-3.70 - 1.15, P = 0.30)方面,两组间无显著差异。RAS组住院时间显著缩短(OR = -0.39, 95%CI:-0.69 - -0.10, P = 0.009)。Egger检验和漏斗图分析表明无显著发表偏倚(P = 0.987)。

结论

RAS在减少术中出血量和缩短住院时间方面具有优势,尽管其与较长的手术时间相关。然而,RAS和LAS术后并发症发生率无显著差异,这一发现可能归因于样本量有限。此外,目前RAS较高的治疗成本可能因其经济限制而阻碍其广泛应用。因此,有必要进行大样本、多中心随机对照试验,并延长随访期以验证长期结果,并对成本效益进行深入研究。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD420251051595

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/b7446da04826/fped-13-1638198-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/8ff2e42fc632/fped-13-1638198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/6541cc80dc46/fped-13-1638198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/20707c035e8e/fped-13-1638198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/6f1849d42f5b/fped-13-1638198-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/6048d3b9ba42/fped-13-1638198-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/8b207decfac8/fped-13-1638198-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/9d81a6aec034/fped-13-1638198-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/ef8208f58931/fped-13-1638198-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/3ce4a5468f8e/fped-13-1638198-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/8f32b4fa8f19/fped-13-1638198-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/c6ffba74c212/fped-13-1638198-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/d0082724ee03/fped-13-1638198-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/e0fdf375785d/fped-13-1638198-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/0e2440bfe2c5/fped-13-1638198-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/b7446da04826/fped-13-1638198-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/8ff2e42fc632/fped-13-1638198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/6541cc80dc46/fped-13-1638198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/20707c035e8e/fped-13-1638198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/6f1849d42f5b/fped-13-1638198-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/6048d3b9ba42/fped-13-1638198-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/8b207decfac8/fped-13-1638198-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/9d81a6aec034/fped-13-1638198-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/ef8208f58931/fped-13-1638198-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/3ce4a5468f8e/fped-13-1638198-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/8f32b4fa8f19/fped-13-1638198-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/c6ffba74c212/fped-13-1638198-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/d0082724ee03/fped-13-1638198-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/e0fdf375785d/fped-13-1638198-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/0e2440bfe2c5/fped-13-1638198-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1e6/12364639/b7446da04826/fped-13-1638198-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted surgery in the treatment of children with Hirschsprung's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗先天性巨结肠患儿的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Front Pediatr. 2025 Aug 6;13:1638198. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1638198. eCollection 2025.
2
Postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic pull-through surgery in pediatric Hirschsprung's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜拖出术治疗小儿先天性巨结肠症的术后结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jul 24;41(1):228. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06137-0.
3
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助与开放性肾切除术用于活体供肾者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006124.pub3.
5
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.
6
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
7
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
8
Closure of mesenteric defects for prevention of internal hernia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in bariatric surgery.肥胖症手术中Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后肠系膜缺损的闭合以预防内疝
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 8;4(4):CD014612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014612.pub2.
9
Heated insufflation with or without humidification for laparoscopic abdominal surgery.用于腹腔镜腹部手术的带或不带加湿的热吹入法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 19;10(10):CD007821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007821.pub3.
10
Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding.对于月经过多患者,在进行子宫内膜破坏术前使用的术前子宫内膜减薄剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 15;2013(11):CD010241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010241.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Current and Future Trends in Performance of Vaginal Hysterectomy in the United States.美国阴道子宫切除术的当前及未来发展趋势
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 22;146(1):94-103. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005945.
2
Robotic Central Pancreatectomy: Patient Selection and Surgical Approach.机器人辅助中央胰腺切除术:患者选择与手术方法
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;32(6):4128-4129. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17028-y. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
3
Robotic-assisted Swenson procedure for Hirschsprung's disease with a median age of 35 days: a single-center retrospective study.
中位年龄35天的先天性巨结肠症的机器人辅助Swenson手术:一项单中心回顾性研究
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Feb 27;41(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-05988-x.
4
Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted modified Soave short muscle cuff anastomosis surgeries for classical Hirschsprung disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助改良Soave短肌袖吻合术治疗先天性巨结肠的比较
BMC Surg. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02799-8.
5
Surgery for the Treatment of HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手术治疗人乳头瘤病毒阴性口咽鳞状细胞癌——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Head Neck. 2025 Jun;47(6):1749-1757. doi: 10.1002/hed.28088. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
6
Utilizing vaginal natural orifice to facilitate bowel manipulation during totally intracorporeal ileal conduit construction: a retrospective cohort study.利用阴道自然腔道在完全腹腔镜下回肠代膀胱术构建过程中辅助肠道操作:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2453827. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2453827. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
7
Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Propensity-score matched anaylsis.机器人辅助与传统开放食管癌切除术的长期肿瘤学结局:倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 May;51(5):109591. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109591. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
8
Robotic Approach to Paediatric Gastrointestinal Diseases: A Systematic Review.小儿胃肠疾病的机器人手术治疗:一项系统综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Feb 22;11(3):273. doi: 10.3390/children11030273.
9
Robotic-assisted Proctosigmoidectomy Versus Laparoscopic-assisted Soave Pull-through for Hirschsprung Disease: Medium-term Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Study.机器人辅助乙状结肠直肠切除术与腹腔镜辅助Soave拖出术治疗先天性巨结肠症:一项前瞻性多中心研究的中期结果
Ann Surg. 2025 Apr 1;281(4):689-697. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006172. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
10
Robot-assisted abdominal surgery in children less than 5 months of age: retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助腹部手术在小于 5 个月龄儿童中的应用:回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):859-863. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000867.