Berliner Elizabeth A, Stone Martha E, Boulting Scarlett, Scarlett Janet
Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Feline Med Surg. 2025 Aug;27(8):1098612X251347947. doi: 10.1177/1098612X251347947. Epub 2025 Aug 23.
ObjectivesThe objective of this prospective study was to compare the nociceptive blunting and analgesic efficacy of two different local anesthetic solutions (lidocaine and a mixture of lidocaine plus bupivacaine) and a placebo for cat castrations in a high-quality, high-volume spay/neuter (HQHVSN) clinic as an adjunct to standard HQHVSN anesthetic protocols.MethodsA total of 88 healthy, shelter-owned male cats presenting to an HQHVSN clinic in the northeastern USA between August 2019 and October 2020 were enrolled in this blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Cats were randomized to receive an intratesticular injection of saline placebo (SP group; n = 32), lidocaine 1 mg/kg (L group; n = 34) or a mixture of lidocaine 1 mg/kg and bupivacaine 1 mg/kg (LB group; n = 22) before routine castration. Other than the use of randomized local anesthetic blocks, all standard HQHVSN protocols for anesthesia and surgery were followed. Measured variables included perioperative heart rates, surgeon satisfaction with anesthetic depth, surgeon satisfaction with tissue quality, postoperative pain scores and the rate of incisional complications.ResultsTreatment groups did not differ in demographic characteristics or baseline heart rate. Percent increase in intraoperative heart rate was significantly larger in cats in the SP group than in the L ( <0.001) and LB groups ( <0.001); the L and LB groups did not differ from each other ( = 0.457). Surgeon-reported unsatisfactory anesthetic depth occurred more frequently in the SP group ( = 2.68, = 0.044). Surgeon satisfaction with tissue quality, postoperative pain scores and incision complication rates were statistically similar between groups.Conclusions and relevanceThis study is the first to assess the efficacy of local anesthesia for feline castration in an HQHVSN environment, where sustainable operations require delivering humane care with optimal efficiency and resource management. Despite the brief interval between intratesticular anesthetic administration and auto-ligation of the second testicle (median 5 mins, interquartile range 3-7), local anesthesia significantly reduced nociception compared with placebo and did not increase the incidence of incisional complications. These perioperative advantages support incorporating local blocks into multimodal anesthesia and analgesia protocols in HQHVSN clinics.
目的
本前瞻性研究的目的是在一家高质量、高容量的绝育/去势(HQHVSN)诊所中,比较两种不同局部麻醉溶液(利多卡因和利多卡因加布比卡因的混合物)和一种安慰剂用于猫去势手术时的伤害性钝化和镇痛效果,作为HQHVSN标准麻醉方案的辅助手段。
方法
2019年8月至2020年10月期间,共有88只健康的、收容所拥有的雄性猫被送至美国东北部一家HQHVSN诊所,参与了这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。猫被随机分为三组,在常规去势手术前分别接受睾丸内注射生理盐水安慰剂(SP组;n = 32)、1 mg/kg利多卡因(L组;n = 34)或1 mg/kg利多卡因与1 mg/kg布比卡因的混合物(LB组;n = 22)。除了使用随机局部麻醉阻滞外,所有HQHVSN标准的麻醉和手术方案均被遵循。测量变量包括围手术期心率、外科医生对麻醉深度的满意度、外科医生对组织质量的满意度、术后疼痛评分和切口并发症发生率。
结果
治疗组在人口统计学特征或基线心率方面没有差异。SP组猫术中心率的百分比增加显著大于L组(<0.001)和LB组(<0.001);L组和LB组之间没有差异(= 0.457)。外科医生报告的麻醉深度不满意在SP组中更频繁出现(= 2.68,= 0.044)。各组之间外科医生对组织质量的满意度、术后疼痛评分和切口并发症发生率在统计学上相似。
结论及相关性
本研究首次评估了在HQHVSN环境中局部麻醉用于猫去势手术的效果,在这种环境中,可持续的手术需要以最佳效率和资源管理提供人道护理。尽管睾丸内注射麻醉剂与第二个睾丸自动结扎之间的间隔时间很短(中位数5分钟,四分位间距3 - 7),但与安慰剂相比,局部麻醉显著降低了伤害感受,且没有增加切口并发症的发生率。这些围手术期优势支持在HQHVSN诊所将局部阻滞纳入多模式麻醉和镇痛方案。