Dwajan Anirudh
Orthopaedics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 19;17(8):e90528. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90528. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Biological therapies such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), stem cells, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate have gained attention in orthopaedics as potential alternatives to conventional interventions. PRP, in particular, has been extensively studied in spinal disorders, tendinopathies, and cartilage lesions. While encouraging evidence suggests symptomatic improvement and functional recovery in selected patients, limitations such as a lack of standardisation, variability in preparation, and limited long-term outcomes hinder universal adoption. In our clinical experience, patients are increasingly curious about PRP, often asking about its cost, availability, and expected outcomes. Although many report short-term relief, sustained long-term benefits remain inconsistent. This editorial discusses the current evidence, practical challenges, and future direction of PRP in orthopaedic practice.
富含血小板血浆(PRP)、干细胞和骨髓抽吸浓缩物等生物疗法作为传统干预措施的潜在替代方法,在骨科领域受到了关注。特别是PRP,已在脊柱疾病、肌腱病和软骨损伤方面进行了广泛研究。虽然有令人鼓舞的证据表明部分患者的症状有所改善且功能得到恢复,但诸如缺乏标准化、制备方法的变异性以及长期疗效有限等局限性阻碍了其广泛应用。根据我们的临床经验,患者对PRP越来越好奇,经常询问其费用、可获得性和预期效果。尽管许多人报告有短期缓解,但长期持续的益处仍不一致。这篇社论讨论了PRP在骨科实践中的现有证据、实际挑战和未来方向。