Lv Zhongyue, Xu Huan, Zhang Ying, Tang Huayuan, Ding Feng, Huang Fengjuan, Sun Yunxiang
Department of Neurology, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315040, China.
School of Physical Science and Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Sep 8;65(17):9261-9273. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01602. Epub 2025 Aug 25.
Abnormal aggregation of α-synuclein (αS) into amyloid fibrils is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease. In contrast, its homologue β-synuclein (βS), colocalized at presynaptic terminals, resists amyloid formation and can even inhibit αS fibrillization. However, how sequence variations affect their structural dynamics remains poorly understood. To address this, we conducted 100 independent 1000 ns atomistic discrete molecular dynamics simulations for both αS and βS monomers. Our results revealed that both proteins predominantly adopted intrinsically disordered conformations, punctuated by transient helices and β-sheets. Both αS and βS exhibited a conserved helical tendency in the first half of the N-terminal domain, while the latter half showed dynamic β-sheet characteristics with αS displaying greater abundance. Notably, the nonamyloid component (NAC) region in αS─critical for its aggregation─frequently adopted dynamic β-sheet structures, whereas the homologous region in βS displayed a greater tendency toward dynamic helices. Despite being largely disordered, the C-terminal regions transiently interacted with β-sheet-prone segments, potentially acting as dynamic caps that limit β-sheet growth in both proteins. Free-energy landscape analysis indicated a clear enthalpy-entropy trade-off: structured conformations were stabilized by lower potential energy but penalized by reduced entropy, whereas disordered states, despite higher potential energy, were entropically favored. Importantly, potential energy reduction in αS was primarily associated with β-sheet formation, while in βS, it was mainly driven by helix formation. These findings offer mechanistic insights into the distinct conformational landscapes of αS and βS and establish a thermodynamic framework for understanding how sequence differences modulate their structural properties and functional roles.
α-突触核蛋白(αS)异常聚集成淀粉样原纤维是帕金森病等神经退行性疾病的一个标志。相比之下,其同源物β-突触核蛋白(βS)共定位于突触前末端,可抵抗淀粉样蛋白形成,甚至能抑制αS纤维化。然而,序列变异如何影响它们的结构动力学仍知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们对αS和βS单体进行了100次独立的1000纳秒原子级离散分子动力学模拟。我们的结果表明,两种蛋白质主要采用内在无序的构象,其间穿插着短暂的螺旋和β折叠。αS和βS在N端结构域的前半部分均表现出保守的螺旋倾向,而后半部分则表现出动态β折叠特征,其中αS表现得更为丰富。值得注意的是,αS中对其聚集至关重要的非淀粉样成分(NAC)区域经常采用动态β折叠结构,而βS中的同源区域则表现出更大的动态螺旋倾向。尽管C端区域在很大程度上是无序的,但它们会与易于形成β折叠的片段发生短暂相互作用,可能作为动态帽结构限制两种蛋白质中β折叠的生长。自由能景观分析表明存在明显的焓-熵权衡:结构化构象通过较低的势能得以稳定,但会因熵的降低而受到惩罚,而无序状态尽管势能较高,但在熵方面更占优势。重要的是,αS中势能的降低主要与β折叠的形成有关,而在βS中,主要是由螺旋的形成驱动的。这些发现为αS和βS不同的构象景观提供了机制性见解,并建立了一个热力学框架,以理解序列差异如何调节它们的结构特性和功能作用。