• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中估计失血量作为术后控尿和肿瘤学结局预测指标的回顾性分析:525例病例研究

Estimated Blood Loss as a Predictor of Postoperative Continence and Oncologic Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of 525 Cases.

作者信息

Aybal Halil Cagri, Yilmaz Mehmet, Barlas Irfan Safak, Duvarci Mehmet, Dagli Isa, Akdagcik Zeynep, Guven Selcuk, Tunc Lutfi

机构信息

Clinic of Urology, Polatlı Duatepe State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Urology, MediClin Kraichgau-Klinik, Bad Rappenau, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18175-y.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-18175-y
PMID:40853626
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of perioperative estimated blood loss (EBL) with peri- and postoperative parameters during the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedure.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, data from patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RARP between December 2012 and August 2024 (n = 530) were analyzed. Patients with EBL of 100 ml or less were defined as group 1 (n = 359), and those with EBL exceeding 100 ml were defined as group 2 (n = 166). Perioperative data and postoperative functional and pathologic outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The patients in group 2 had longer lymph node dissection time, prostatectomy time, anastomosis time, total operation time, drain removal time, and hospital stay, as well a greater EBL, higher surgical margin ratio, greater positive surgical margin according to pathologic stage, and longer time to reach continence (p = 0.001). No difference was observed between urinary incontinence (UI) scores at the sixth month postoperatively (p = 0.191). A high degree of correlation was observed between EBL and other parameters (drain removal time, hospital length of stay, time to reach continence, prostatectomy time, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire [ICIQ] total score at the first and third months, and total operation and anastomosis time, respectively; rho-factor ≥ 0.5; p < 0.05). In the multivariate regression analysis, EBL was determined to be a predictive factor for achieving postoperative urinary continence.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated that perioperative EBL is associated with postoperative urinary continence and oncologic outcomes after RARP.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)过程中围手术期估计失血量(EBL)与围手术期及术后参数之间的关系。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,分析了2012年12月至2024年8月期间接受RARP的局限性前列腺癌(PCa)患者的数据(n = 530)。EBL为100毫升或更少的患者被定义为第1组(n = 359),EBL超过100毫升的患者被定义为第2组(n = 166)。记录并比较两组的围手术期数据以及术后功能和病理结果。

结果

第2组患者的淋巴结清扫时间、前列腺切除时间、吻合时间、总手术时间、引流管拔除时间和住院时间更长,EBL更大,手术切缘率更高,根据病理分期手术切缘阳性率更高,达到尿控的时间更长(p = 0.001)。术后第六个月的尿失禁(UI)评分无差异(p = 0.191)。观察到EBL与其他参数之间存在高度相关性(分别为引流管拔除时间、住院时间、达到尿控的时间、前列腺切除时间、术后第一个月和第三个月的国际尿失禁咨询问卷[ICIQ]总分以及总手术时间和吻合时间;rho系数≥0.5;p < 0.05)。在多变量回归分析中,EBL被确定为实现术后尿控的预测因素。

结论

该研究表明,围手术期EBL与RARP术后的尿控和肿瘤学结果相关。

相似文献

1
Estimated Blood Loss as a Predictor of Postoperative Continence and Oncologic Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of 525 Cases.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中估计失血量作为术后控尿和肿瘤学结局预测指标的回顾性分析:525例病例研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18175-y.
2
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
3
Does transurethral resection of the prostate before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy have adverse effects on patients diagnosed with prostate cancer: a comparative evidence-based analysis?在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术之前进行经尿道前列腺切除术对前列腺癌患者有不良影响吗:一项基于证据的比较分析?
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 20;19(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02234-3.
4
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
5
Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与常规机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗经活检证实的前列腺癌患者的手术和功能结局。这些结果是否值得?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate. 2023 Nov;83(15):1395-1414. doi: 10.1002/pros.24604. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
6
Comparison of Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis from KSER Update Series.机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放性根治性前列腺切除术结果的比较:KSER更新系列的系统评价和网络荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 2;61(1):61. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010061.
7
The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术在高危前列腺癌治疗中的作用:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):918-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 18.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析报告机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控恢复的研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
9
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Comparison of open perineal and robot-assisted reconstruction in vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis.开放性会阴重建术与机器人辅助重建术治疗膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄的比较
World J Urol. 2025 Jul 7;43(1):413. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05808-w.

本文引用的文献

1
A Delphi-based exploration of factors impacting blood loss and operative time in robotic prostatectomy.基于德尔菲法的机器人前列腺切除术术中失血量和手术时间影响因素的探讨
J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 2;18(1):392. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02145-9.
2
A Systematic Review on the Impact of Quality Assurance Programs on Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy.系统评价:质量保证计划对根治性前列腺切除术治疗效果的影响
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Sep;10(5):754-760. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Comparing robotic and open surgical techniques in gallbladder cancer management: a detailed systematic review and meta-analysis.
比较胆囊癌管理中机器人与开放手术技术:详细的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 5;18(1):111. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01851-8.
4
Do bony pelvis parameters affect perioperative outcomes in open radical prostatectomy?骨盆参数是否会影响开放性根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局?
Prostate Int. 2022 Sep;10(3):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 26.
5
Influence of operative time and blood loss on surgical margins and functional outcomes for laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术时间和失血量对手术切缘及功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性分析
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(4):503-515. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0177. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术术后切缘阳性和生化复发的预测。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93860-y.
7
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
An intra-operative video comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy.腹腔镜与机器人经腹侧入路肾上腺切除术的术中视频比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Apr;17(2):e2203. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2203. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
Comparison and trend of perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy: nationwide inpatient sample 2009-2014.2009-2014 年全国住院患者样本中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局比较和趋势。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Sep-Oct;46(5):754-771. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0420.
10
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准方法的比较:系统评价和比较结果分析。
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):8-16. doi: 10.1111/bju.14887. Epub 2019 Aug 26.