Khakisahneh Saeid, Wang Jing-Hua, Zhang Xue-Ying, Choi Yura, Han Song-Yi, Song Eun-Ji, Nam Young-Do, Kim Hojun
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, 814 Siksa-dong, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, 10326, Republic of Korea.
State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15574-9.
Dyspepsia is a prevalent refractory condition that arises from various causes and lacks definitive treatment. There is an urgent need for evidence to support the use of herbal medicines in the treatment of gastroenterological disorders. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of two common herbal formulas-namely, Shihosogan-tang (SST) and Yijung-tang (YJT)-on loperamide (LOP)-induced dyspepsia and to explore their potential mechanisms. A dyspepsia model was established using Sprague-Dawley rats by intraperitoneal LOP injection at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day for one week. During this period, 30% ethanol extract of SST (1.4 g/kg/day) or YJT (2 g/kg/day) was intragastrically administered in rats. Mosapride (3 mg/kg/day) was used as the positive control. Unlike YJT, SST significantly mitigated LOP-induced reductions in intestinal length, gastrointestinal transit ratio, and serum ghrelin levels. Conversely, YJT significantly enhanced defecation, ileum villus length, and muscular thickness, outperforming SST. Expression of genes related to intestinal motility (ZO-1), inflammation (IL-6), and water absorption (SERT, AQP-3) indicated that both treatments ameliorated LOP-induced changes in the duodenum. Additionally, neuropeptides and hormones (TRH, bombesin, motilin, glucagon, neurotensin, PYY), Toll-like receptors (TLR-2 and TLR-4), and growth factors (GDNF and BMP2) were noticeably altered by SST and/or YJT treatment. While neither LOP nor the herbal formulas affected gut microbiota α-diversity, SST and YJT altered β-diversity compared to LOP alone, unlike mosapride. SST improves dyspepsia more effectively than YJT, possibly through mechanisms involving intestinal hormone regulation, inflammation inhibition, and gut microbiota modulation.
消化不良是一种普遍存在的难治性病症,由多种原因引起且缺乏明确的治疗方法。迫切需要证据支持草药在胃肠疾病治疗中的应用。本研究旨在比较两种常见草药配方——即四君子汤(SST)和异功汤(YJT)——对洛哌丁胺(LOP)诱导的消化不良的治疗效果,并探索其潜在机制。通过以3mg/kg/天的剂量腹腔注射LOP,连续一周,使用Sprague-Dawley大鼠建立消化不良模型。在此期间,将SST(1.4g/kg/天)或YJT(2g/kg/天)的30%乙醇提取物经胃内给予大鼠。莫沙必利(3mg/kg/天)用作阳性对照。与YJT不同,SST显著减轻了LOP诱导的肠长度、胃肠转运率和血清胃饥饿素水平的降低。相反,YJT显著增强了排便、回肠绒毛长度和肌肉厚度,优于SST。与肠道运动(ZO-1)、炎症(IL-6)和水吸收(SERT、AQP-3)相关的基因表达表明,两种治疗均改善了LOP诱导的十二指肠变化。此外,SST和/或YJT治疗显著改变了神经肽和激素(TRH、蛙皮素、胃动素、胰高血糖素、神经降压素、PYY)、Toll样受体(TLR-2和TLR-4)以及生长因子(GDNF和BMP2)。虽然LOP和草药配方均未影响肠道微生物群的α多样性,但与单独使用LOP相比,SST和YJT改变了β多样性,这与莫沙必利不同。SST比YJT更有效地改善消化不良,可能是通过涉及肠道激素调节、炎症抑制和肠道微生物群调节的机制实现的。