• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤内镜下切除术的可行性及安全性

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

作者信息

Luo Shao-Bin, Liu Zu-Qiang, Wang Li, Zhang Yi-Qun, Cai Ming-Yan, Li Quan-Lin, Zhou Ping-Hong

机构信息

Endoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2025 Aug 7;13:a26551439. doi: 10.1055/a-2655-1439. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1055/a-2655-1439
PMID:40860693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12371658/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still considered a great challenge with a high risk of complications. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal GIST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 2013 and August 2024, we performed a retrospective study of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital. Data on patient characteristics, clinical outcome, and follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients with duodenal GISTs were enrolled, including 31 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 42 who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Mean lesion size was 1.2 ± 0.5 cm and 1.9 ± 0.9 cm, respectively. En bloc resection rates were 96.8% and 95.2%, respectively. Rates of R0 resection were 45.2% and 42.9%, respectively. Rates of R1 resection were 54.8% and 57.1%, respectively. No patient transferred to open surgery. Postoperative adverse events included delayed bleeding (1 case), delayed perforation (1 case), delayed wall edema (2 cases), hydrothorax (1 case), and retroperitoneal infection (1 case). Mean hospital stays were 4.1 ± 2.8 days and 6.2 ± 4.9 days, respectively. No metastasis or duodenal stenosis were detected during the follow-up period (64.8 ± 43.6 months and 61.3 ± 40.2 months, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in one patient with high recurrence risk at 56 months after EFTR.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD and EFTR are safe, minimally invasive treatments for duodenal GISTs. Moreover, the EFTR technique may have advantages of completely resecting lesions originating from the deep muscularis propria layer, particularly lesions with extraluminal growth.

摘要

背景与研究目的

十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的内镜切除仍被认为是一项极具挑战性的操作,并发症风险较高。本研究旨在评估十二指肠GIST内镜切除的有效性和安全性。

患者与方法

2013年6月至2024年8月期间,我们对在中山医院接受内镜切除的十二指肠GIST患者进行了一项回顾性研究。收集了患者特征、临床结局及随访数据。

结果

共纳入73例十二指肠GIST患者,其中31例行内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD),42例行内镜全层切除术(EFTR)。病变平均大小分别为1.2±0.5cm和1.9±0.9cm。整块切除率分别为96.8%和95.2%。R0切除率分别为45.2%和42.9%。R1切除率分别为54.8%和57.1%。无患者转为开放手术。术后不良事件包括迟发性出血(1例)、迟发性穿孔(1例)、迟发性壁水肿(2例)、胸腔积液(1例)和腹膜后感染(1例)。平均住院时间分别为4.1±2.8天和6.2±4.9天。随访期间(分别为64.8±43.6个月和61.3±40.2个月)未检测到转移或十二指肠狭窄。1例高复发风险患者在EFTR术后56个月出现局部复发。

结论

ESD和EFTR是治疗十二指肠GIST安全、微创的方法。此外,EFTR技术可能具有完全切除起源于固有肌层深层的病变的优势,尤其是具有腔外生长的病变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/abf0aee17bf4/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586122.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/d8e384c9b5c9/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586109.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/4b1ff761d15e/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586110.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/b0e77e484b78/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586121.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/abf0aee17bf4/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586122.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/d8e384c9b5c9/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586109.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/4b1ff761d15e/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586110.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/b0e77e484b78/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586121.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/12371658/abf0aee17bf4/10-1055-a-2655-1439_26586122.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤内镜下切除术的可行性及安全性
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Aug 7;13:a26551439. doi: 10.1055/a-2655-1439. eCollection 2025.
2
Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection Versus Submucosal Tunnel Endoscopic Resection for Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.内镜全层切除术与黏膜下隧道内镜切除术治疗上消化道病变的系统评价和Meta分析
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2025 Oct 1;59(9):811-819. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002233.
3
Internal traction in endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial lesions arising from the muscularis propria: Comparative study.内镜下全层切除胃固有肌层来源的胃上皮下病变的内牵引:对比研究
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jun 12;13:a25442572. doi: 10.1055/a-2544-2572. eCollection 2025.
4
Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection vs Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Submucosal Tumors.内镜全层切除术与黏膜下隧道内镜切除术治疗胃黏膜下肿瘤的对比
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 13;16(8):e00869. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000869. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
5
[Application research of endoscopic-laparoscopic regional gastric resection combined with sentinel lymph node basin dissection in patients with early gastric cancer].内镜-腹腔镜区域胃切除术联合前哨淋巴结清扫在早期胃癌患者中的应用研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jul 1;63(7):587-596. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20250117-00034.
6
Comparison of treatment strategies for submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria at esophagogastric junction or cardia.食管胃交界部或贲门固有肌层来源黏膜下肿瘤治疗策略的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 21;31(23):106261. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.106261.
7
Current Management of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Duodenal Neoplasia: Suitable Endoscopic Resection Approaches.十二指肠肿瘤的腹腔镜与内镜联合手术的当前管理:合适的内镜切除方法
Digestion. 2025 Aug 13:1-6. doi: 10.1159/000547890.
8
Endoscopic full-thickness resection for upper gastrointestinal tract lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜全层切除术治疗上消化道病变:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3293-3305. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09801-x. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
9
Outcomes and Limitations of Duodenal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.美国十二指肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果与局限性
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09238-x.
10
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia: Meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗残留或复发性结直肠肿瘤的有效性和安全性:Meta分析
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jul 1;13:a26060982. doi: 10.1055/a-2606-0982. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A subepithelial lesion algorithm for endoscopic (SAFE) resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract.上消化道内镜下亚上皮病变(SAFE)切除算法
Endoscopy. 2025 Feb;57(2):95-106. doi: 10.1055/a-2369-7854. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Feasibility and efficacy of minimally invasive limited resection for primary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study.原发性十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤微创局限性切除术的可行性及疗效:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Surg. 2024 Apr 27;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02417-z.
3
Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors: Japanese multicenter prospective study.
内镜下全层切除术治疗胃黏膜下肿瘤:日本多中心前瞻性研究。
Dig Endosc. 2024 Jul;36(7):811-821. doi: 10.1111/den.14717. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
4
Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial.内镜全层切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗挑战性结直肠病变的随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Dec;98(6):987-997.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
Endoscopic resection for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China.内镜切除治疗非胃胃肠道间质瘤:来自中国一家大型三级医院的回顾性研究。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug;47(7):102152. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102152. Epub 2023 May 29.
6
Endoscopic resection and suturing methods for non-ampullary duodenal submucosal tumors: "mini-invasive" treatments that should never be underestimated.内镜下切除缝合术治疗非壶腹周围十二指肠黏膜下肿瘤:“微创”治疗,不可小觑。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6135-6144. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10013-0. Epub 2023 May 5.
7
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A single center analysis.十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤内镜下切除术的有效性和安全性:单中心分析
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Nov 16;14(11):684-693. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.684.
8
Adverse events of endoscopic full-thickness resection: results from the German and Dutch nationwide colorectal FTRD registry.内镜全层切除术的不良事件:来自德国和荷兰全国结直肠 FTRD 登记处的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Apr;97(4):780-789.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
9
Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection with the full-thickness resection device.使用全层切除装置进行内镜全层切除术的现状
Dig Endosc. 2023 Jan;35(2):232-242. doi: 10.1111/den.14425. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
10
Effects of endoscopic therapy and surgical resection on long-term survival outcomes in patients with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end result program analysis.内镜治疗与手术切除对十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤患者长期生存结局的影响:一项监测、流行病学及最终结果项目分析
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8030-8038. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09231-9. Epub 2022 Apr 18.