Malungpaishrope Kanchai, Kittithamvongs Piyabuth, Siripoonyothai Sopinun, Anantavorasakul Navapong, Uerpairojkit Chairoj, Leechavengvongs Somsak
Upper Extremity and Reconstructive Microsurgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Orthopaedics, Lerdsin General Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 25;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00092. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
Transfer of intercostal nerves to the radial nerve branch innervating the long head of the triceps muscle for elbow extension is indicated in patients with traumatic brachial plexus palsy that is either the pan-plexus type or C5-C7 palsy with no triceps muscle function. The procedure aims to restore triceps muscle function through the use of the intercostal nerves, which are expendable nerves, as donors.
The procedure is performed by first identifying the third to fifth intercostal nerves and coaptating them to the radial nerve branch innervating the long head of the triceps muscle. Three intercostal nerves are utilized because our previous study revealed that the use of 2 intercostal nerves resulted in poor outcomes. Additionally, 3 intercostal nerves are comparable in size to the recipient nerve. To identify the intercostal nerves, a curved incision is made over the sixth rib to the medial side of the arm, detaching the pectoralis major and minor from their distal insertion. The intercostal nerves are dissected from the inferior border of the third to fifth ribs. The radial nerve branch innervating the long head of the triceps muscle can be found distal to the teres major muscle as the first branch from the radial nerve via the same incision, at the medial side of the arm. Subsequently, the 3 intercostal nerves are coaptated to the radial nerve branch to the long head of the triceps muscle.
A deficit in active elbow extension may be deemed acceptable for certain patients who are amenable to utilizing gravity for performing such extensions. Nonoperative treatment could be contemplated for individuals falling into this category. Alternative surgical approaches may include nerve transfers utilizing other donor nerves, such as the ulnar or thoracodorsal nerves, or tendon transfer procedures.
Although active elbow extension may not be the primary focus when treating brachial plexus injury, a lack of active elbow extension affects various daily activities, such as overhead tasks, the use of a walking aid, and reaching for objects on a table. Consequently, reanimating the muscle through the use of expendable donor nerves appears to be a suitable approach, particularly in young and active patients, aiming to restore function and enhance overall quality of life. Therefore, we recommend this procedure as an adjunct to other surgical interventions in active patients who would benefit from restored elbow extension to perform daily activities.
The procedure demonstrated satisfactory results in our prior study, consistent with findings from other studies that reported good results in 57% to 80% of patients. In our prior study, 65% of patients achieved favorable motor function (Medical Research Council grade 3 to 4), with no observed donor-site morbidity or respiratory complications. Factors negatively impacting satisfactory outcomes include being overweight (body mass index > 25 kg/m), the operative hand being the nondominant hand, and a prolonged duration from injury to surgery.
The procedure is recommended for patients presenting with pan-plexus palsy and upper-plexus palsy lacking triceps function. In the latter scenario, confirmation of the triceps muscle deficit is essential through serial examinations, electromyography, and intraoperative nerve stimulation.Previous rib fracture(s) do not serve as a contraindication for surgery. However, caution should be exercised in patients with a history of chest drain insertion because of the possibility of damage to the intercostal nerves.In cases of root avulsion injury, early surgical intervention is advisable.The use of fibrin glue may be considered to facilitate the coaptation of nerves.Patients undergoing this and other brachial plexus procedures should be thoroughly informed regarding the associated risks and benefits.The patient's commitment to participate in rehabilitation after surgery is imperative.
ICN = intercostal nerveMRC = Medical Research Council.
对于全臂丛型或C5 - C7麻痹且三头肌无功能的创伤性臂丛神经麻痹患者,可将肋间神经转移至支配肱三头肌长头的桡神经分支以实现肘关节伸展。该手术旨在通过使用可牺牲的肋间神经作为供体来恢复肱三头肌功能。
该手术首先要识别第三至第五肋间神经,并将它们与支配肱三头肌长头的桡神经分支进行吻合。使用三根肋间神经,因为我们之前的研究表明,使用两根肋间神经效果不佳。此外,三根肋间神经的大小与受体神经相当。为了识别肋间神经,在第六肋骨上方至手臂内侧做一个弧形切口,将胸大肌和胸小肌从其远端附着处分离。从第三至第五肋骨的下缘解剖出肋间神经。支配肱三头肌长头的桡神经分支可在大圆肌远端作为桡神经的第一分支,通过同一切口在手臂内侧找到。随后,将三根肋间神经与支配肱三头肌长头的桡神经分支进行吻合。
对于某些适合利用重力进行肘关节伸展的患者,主动肘关节伸展功能的缺陷可能被认为是可以接受的。这类患者可考虑非手术治疗。替代手术方法可能包括利用其他供体神经(如尺神经或胸背神经)进行神经转移,或肌腱转移手术。
虽然在治疗臂丛神经损伤时,主动肘关节伸展可能不是主要关注点,但缺乏主动肘关节伸展功能会影响各种日常活动,如举过头顶的任务、使用助行器以及伸手去拿桌上的物品。因此,通过使用可牺牲的供体神经来恢复肌肉功能似乎是一种合适的方法,特别是对于年轻且活跃的患者,旨在恢复功能并提高整体生活质量。所以,我们建议将该手术作为其他手术干预的辅助手段,用于那些能从恢复肘关节伸展功能以进行日常活动中受益的活跃患者。
该手术在我们之前的研究中显示出令人满意的结果,与其他研究结果一致,其他研究报告称57%至80%的患者取得了良好效果。在我们之前的研究中,65%的患者获得了良好的运动功能(医学研究委员会3至4级),未观察到供体部位并发症或呼吸并发症。对满意结果产生负面影响的因素包括超重(体重指数>25 kg/m²)、手术侧为非优势手以及受伤至手术的时间延长。
该手术推荐用于患有全臂丛麻痹和缺乏三头肌功能的上丛麻痹患者。在后一种情况下,通过系列检查、肌电图和术中神经刺激来确认三头肌功能缺陷至关重要。既往肋骨骨折不作为手术禁忌证。然而,对于有胸腔引流管置入史的患者应谨慎操作,因为有可能损伤肋间神经。在神经根撕脱伤的情况下,建议早期手术干预。可考虑使用纤维蛋白胶来促进神经吻合。接受该手术及其他臂丛神经手术的患者应充分了解相关风险和益处。患者术后积极参与康复治疗至关重要。
ICN = 肋间神经;MRC = 医学研究委员会