Zhang Xinhe, Feng Jia, Tan Zhengwei, Zhang Herui, Hu Huijin, Zhao Yuechao, Wu Dijiong, Zhang Yu, Wu Liqiang, Hu Tonglin, Yan Zhengsong, Ye Baodong, Liu Wenbin
Nanyang First People's Hospital, Nanyang, China.
The First Clinical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 8;12:1626325. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1626325. eCollection 2025.
Delayed platelet engraftment (DPE) after allo-HSCT lacks standard therapy. Avatrombopag (AVA), a second-generation TPO agonist, is often delayed until transfusion-related events occur, potentially harming high-risk recipients.
We compared recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) with early AVA switching for treating DPE in aplastic anemia (AA) patients post-allo-HSCT to optimize management strategies.
This single-center study retrospectively enrolled 154 consecutive AA patients receiving allo-HSCT at Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (March 2019-September 2023). Of these, 39 deemed high-risk for poor platelet engraftment (advanced donor/recipient age, low CD34 + dose, etc.) were non-randomly assigned: (1) AVA group ( = 11), switched to avatrombopag if platelets remained <30 × 10/L on day +14 or <50 × 10/L on day +21; (2) rh-TPO group ( = 28), continued rh-TPO monotherapy. Allocation followed clinician judgment and patient consent.
Our findings revealed that the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was notably higher in AVA group (100% vs. 78.6%, = 0.106). And the complete remission (CR) rate in the AVA group was significantly higher than that in the rh-TPO group at 3 and 6 months after transplantation(100% vs. 67.9%, = 0.032; 100% vs. 71.4%, = 0.047). At 3 months post transplantation, the platelet engraftment rate in the AVA group was significantly higher than that in the rhTPO group (67.9% vs. 100%, = 0.04). The median time to achieve platelet engraftment was 20 (13, 25) days for the AVA group and 23 (10, 68) days for the rh-TPO group. Additionally, the AVA group reached platelet counts of 30, 50, and 125 × 109/L more rapidly than the rh-TPO group. Furthermore, at 3 months post-transplantation, the median platelet transfusion volume of AVA group was less than rh-TPO group (63 U vs. 82 U, = 0.141).
For patients identified as being at high risk for poor platelet engraftment following allo-HSCT, early transition to AVA can significantly reduce the duration of DPE and promote platelet recovery post-transplantation. This strategy has the potential to enhance patient survival rates and overall outcomes.
异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后血小板植入延迟(DPE)缺乏标准治疗方法。阿伐曲泊帕(AVA)是第二代血小板生成素(TPO)激动剂,通常在输血相关事件发生后才开始使用,这可能会对高危受者造成伤害。
我们比较了重组人血小板生成素(rh-TPO)与早期换用AVA治疗allo-HSCT后再生障碍性贫血(AA)患者的DPE,以优化管理策略。
这项单中心研究回顾性纳入了2019年3月至2023年9月在浙江省中医院接受allo-HSCT的154例连续AA患者。其中,39例被认为血小板植入不良风险高(供体/受体年龄较大、CD34+剂量低等)的患者被非随机分配:(1)AVA组(n = 11),如果在+14天血小板仍<30×10⁹/L或在+21天血小板仍<50×10⁹/L,则换用阿伐曲泊帕;(2)rh-TPO组(n = 28),继续rh-TPO单药治疗。分配遵循临床医生的判断和患者的同意。
我们的研究结果显示,AVA组的1年总生存率(OS)显著更高(100%对78.6%,P = 0.106)。移植后3个月和6个月时,AVA组的完全缓解(CR)率显著高于rh-TPO组(100%对67.9%,P = 0.032;100%对71.4%,P = 0.047)。移植后3个月,AVA组的血小板植入率显著高于rh-TPO组(67.9%对100%,P = 0.04)。AVA组达到血小板植入的中位时间为20(13,25)天,rh-TPO组为23(10,68)天。此外,AVA组比rh-TPO组更快达到30、50和125×10⁹/L的血小板计数。此外,移植后3个月,AVA组的中位血小板输注量低于rh-TPO组(63U对82U,P = 0.141)。
对于allo-HSCT后被确定为血小板植入不良高危患者,早期换用AVA可显著缩短DPE持续时间,促进移植后血小板恢复。该策略有可能提高患者生存率和总体预后。