Suppr超能文献

老年患者无移位II型齿状突骨折的管理:军人与平民人群的比较

Management of Nondisplaced Type II Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Comparison of Military and Civilian Populations.

作者信息

Ghenbot Sennay G, O'Hara Matthew, Schlaff Cody D, McCarthy Conor, Tran Jeremy, Lee Richard C, Pisano Alfred J, Fredericks Donald J, Wagner Scott C, Helgeson Melvin D

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly. Type I and III odontoid fractures are typically treated nonoperatively with Aspen collar immobilization. Treatment of type II odontoid process fractures is of particular interest because of the risk of nonunion, secondary to the watershed blood supply to the base of the odontoid process. Though there is consistent agreement regarding the management of displaced type II fractures, there is marked heterogeneity in the clinical management of nondisplaced type II fractures.

METHODS

We queried the Military Health System Data Repository for the ICD-10 codes for nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures and CPT codes for surgical treatment, from 2015 to 2022. We excluded patients under the age of 65, polytraumatized patients, and patients with a diagnosis of displaced type II odontoid fracture during any clinical encounter.

RESULTS

Four hundred two patients were diagnosed with nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures. 90.3% of patients underwent nonoperative management. Of the 39 patients (9.70%) undergoing surgery, 56% underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis and 44% underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation. There was no significant difference between surgical rates in the military and nonmilitary population (P=0.46). No patient with an initially diagnosed nondisplaced fracture experienced late displacement. The nonunion prevalence was 3.2% and only occurred in patients managed nonoperatively. No patient with an isolated type II odontoid fracture nonunion underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures is the preferred treatment modality in this cohort. C1-C2 fusion remains the most common surgical treatment modality. There is no evidence that late displacement is common or expected in patients undergoing nonoperative management. No patient with a diagnosed fracture nonunion underwent delayed surgical intervention.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

本研究旨在调查无移位的II型齿状突骨折的手术治疗模式。

背景数据总结

齿状突骨折约占所有颈椎骨折的1/3,多由老年人的低能量机制导致。I型和III型齿状突骨折通常采用阿斯彭颈托固定进行非手术治疗。II型齿状突骨折的治疗尤其受到关注,因为齿状突基部的分水岭血供导致骨不连的风险。尽管对于移位的II型骨折的处理存在一致意见,但在无移位的II型骨折的临床处理上存在显著异质性。

方法

我们查询了军事卫生系统数据存储库,获取2015年至2022年期间无移位的II型齿状突骨折的ICD - 10编码和手术治疗的CPT编码。我们排除了65岁以下的患者、多发伤患者以及在任何临床就诊期间被诊断为移位的II型齿状突骨折的患者。

结果

402例患者被诊断为无移位的II型齿状突骨折。90.3%的患者接受了非手术治疗。在39例(9.70%)接受手术的患者中,56%接受了C1 - C2关节融合术,44%接受了前路齿状突螺钉固定。军人和非军人人群的手术率无显著差异(P = 0.46)。最初诊断为无移位骨折的患者均未出现晚期移位。骨不连发生率为3.2%,仅发生在接受非手术治疗的患者中。没有孤立的II型齿状突骨折骨不连患者接受手术。

结论

在该队列中,无移位的II型齿状突骨折的非手术治疗是首选的治疗方式。C1 - C2融合术仍然是最常见的手术治疗方式。没有证据表明接受非手术治疗的患者中晚期移位常见或会发生。没有诊断为骨折骨不连的患者接受延迟手术干预。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验