• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An analysis of competitive bidding by providers for indigent medical care contracts.对供应商就贫困医疗护理合同进行的竞争性投标的分析。
Health Serv Res. 1985 Dec;20(5):549-77.
2
Provider participation in competitive bidding for indigent patients.医疗服务提供者参与为贫困患者进行的竞争性投标。
Inquiry. 1984 Summer;21(2):161-77.
3
Competitive bidding as a cost-containment strategy for indigent medical care: the implementation experience in Arizona.竞争性投标作为贫困医疗保健的成本控制策略:亚利桑那州的实施经验。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1984 Fall;9(3):427-51. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9-3-427.
4
The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System. A prepayment model for a national health service?亚利桑那州医疗成本控制体系。一种国家医疗服务的预付模式?
West J Med. 1986 Jul;145(1):114-23.
5
Competitive bidding: the challenge for health care managers.竞争性招标:医疗保健管理者面临的挑战。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1985 Spring;10(2):39-53.
6
The Arizona experiment: competitive bidding for indigent medical care.亚利桑那州的实验:贫困医疗护理的竞争性投标
Health Aff (Millwood). 1983 Fall;2(3):87-103. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2.3.87.
7
Nonprofit hospitals in a competitive environment: behavior in the Arizona indigent care experiment.竞争环境下的非营利性医院:亚利桑那州贫困医疗护理实验中的行为表现
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1987 Nov;32(4):475-91.
8
A comparison of existing and alternative competitive bidding systems for indigent medical care.贫困医疗现有竞争性投标系统与替代系统的比较。
Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(7):599-604. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90075-3.
9
Applying competitive bidding to health care.将竞争性投标应用于医疗保健领域。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1987 Winter;12(4):703-22. doi: 10.1215/03616878-12-4-703.
10
Competitive bidding for indigent patients: what are the lessons of the Arizona experiment?为贫困患者进行竞争性招标:亚利桑那州的实验有哪些经验教训?
Ariz Med. 1984 Jul;41(7):448-53.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of HMOs on premiums in employment-based health plans.人乳寡糖对基于就业的健康保险计划保费的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1993 Feb;27(6):779-811.

本文引用的文献

1
Pricing dental services: a market testing approach.牙科服务定价:一种市场测试方法。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1981 Winter;5(4):634-52. doi: 10.1215/03616878-5-4-634.
2
Competitive bidding as a cost-containment strategy for indigent medical care: the implementation experience in Arizona.竞争性投标作为贫困医疗保健的成本控制策略:亚利桑那州的实施经验。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1984 Fall;9(3):427-51. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9-3-427.
3
Major urban health departments: the ideal and the real.主要城市卫生部门:理想与现实
Health Aff (Millwood). 1983 Winter;2(4):88-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2.4.88.
4
Provider participation in competitive bidding for indigent patients.医疗服务提供者参与为贫困患者进行的竞争性投标。
Inquiry. 1984 Summer;21(2):161-77.

对供应商就贫困医疗护理合同进行的竞争性投标的分析。

An analysis of competitive bidding by providers for indigent medical care contracts.

作者信息

Kirkman-Liff B L, Christianson J B, Hillman D G

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1985 Dec;20(5):549-77.

PMID:4086301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1068901/
Abstract

This article develops a model of behavior in bidding for indigent medical care contracts in which bidders set bid prices to maximize their expected utility, conditional on estimates of variables which affect the payoff associated with winning or losing a contract. The hypotheses generated by this model are tested empirically using data from the first round of bidding in the Arizona indigent health care experiment. The behavior of bidding organizations in Arizona is found to be consistent in most respects with the predictions of the model. Bid prices appear to have been influenced by estimated costs and by expectations concerning the potential loss from not securing a contract, the initial wealth of the bidding organization, and the expected number of competitors in the bidding process.

摘要

本文建立了一个贫困医疗护理合同投标行为模型,在该模型中,投标人根据对影响赢得或失去合同相关收益的变量的估计来设定投标价格,以实现其预期效用最大化。利用亚利桑那州贫困医疗保健实验第一轮投标的数据,对该模型产生的假设进行了实证检验。结果发现,亚利桑那州投标机构的行为在大多数方面与模型预测一致。投标价格似乎受到估计成本、对未获得合同可能损失的预期、投标机构的初始财富以及投标过程中预期竞争对手数量的影响。